Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by DrZarkov99 10 months, 2 weeks ago
    What I find absolutely astonishing is the reaction of my liberal associate when I point to the fact that Kavanaugh underwent six FBI background investigations, and that one of them (his White House assignment) requires a lifestyle polygraph (which would have uncovered any sexual misconduct). They are quick to say, "Well he's judge, and so he knows how to beat a polygraph." Yet when it's revealed that Ford taught people how to beat a polygraph, they simply say "She's telling the truth."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  pixelate 10 months, 2 weeks ago
      Liberalism is a mental disorder. They are delusional. Their belief system is a religion. In my experience with these people and their beliefs, they are wholly wrong about damned near everything. About the only thing that I can mark as a positive is their consistency.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by LibertyBelle 10 months, 2 weeks ago
        What consistency?! When they claim to be for freedom of speech, but are not, except for their own; when they claim to be for freedom of religion, but are not, when they disagree with a baker's refusal to bake a cake for a ceremony he disagrees with..., etc., etc. (to pixelate)
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by  $  pixelate 10 months, 2 weeks ago
          I should have included ... They are consistently wrong about everything ... literally everything.

          Whether that be economics (minimum wage laws, for example), science (climate change scam), health-care (Obamacare was the govt take-over of health care), morality in terms of endorsing altruism (by force) instead of volunteerism, the U.S. Constitution (insisting it is a "living document")... they are anti-life when they endorse abortion for those that cannot speak for themselves and are free of guilt (unborn children), and yet they oppose a death penalty (the only guarantee that a convicted perpetrator of the highest order is eliminated and will never harm again). And, as you pointed out -- they are hypocritical frauds when they purport to endorse freedom of expression (religion, speech, the press, assembly, etc) -- when, in fact, they will physically crush any form of dissent.

          They are children, moved by their emotions and soaking in conceit. There is so much conceit and arrogation in the modern liberal, that I also believe they are absent of self-awareness.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  10 months, 2 weeks ago
    Strange how the biggest breakthrough in the whole Judge Kavanaugh smear trial has not been reported by over 90% of the news media.

    Actually not strange. Just more evidence of their biased, prejudicial and discriminatory tactics.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 10 months, 2 weeks ago
    My conclusion is that she is a sniveling, politically motivated, evil witch. A typical liberal professor, i might add.

    She didnt present any facts that could be refuted, like the time, date, place, etc. , but wanted Kavanaugh to divulge HIS evidence first so she could work around it.

    Her sniveling voice gave it away for me. Listening to that made me sick, knowing that that hearing probably cost us taxpayers a million dollars or more.

    Politics today is just mired in political correctness, "optics" as they call it, and other liberal nonsense.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  allosaur 10 months, 2 weeks ago
    Me dino has been dubious about the who, what, where, why, how and when of that polygraph test especially after I saw that neurotic-acting Ford testify.
    Yeah, as Ford stated about Kavenaugh's alleged attack, me dino is absolutely 100% certain that poor lady is one can short of a six-pack.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by LibertyBelle 10 months, 2 weeks ago
    As to the accusations: too many discrepancies; too many holes; and plenty of non-corroborration. I just don't buy it. I was not terribly enthusiastic about Kavanaugh to start with (not being a "conservative" and not one who goes along with the "states'-rights"
    notion, which Ayn Rand properly denounced), but I didn't know all that much about him. But the way they have been treating him has put me on his side, and now I hope he gets confirmed. I have said so in 2 e-mails to my Senators, but they are both Democrats, so I don't expect that that will have very much effect.--
    As to lie-detector tests, I don't have all that much confidence in them. From what I understand, such a test tells not how truthful (or not) the party is, but how nervous he is. I read a letter once to Ann Landers (or maybe it was Dear Abby) from someone who said he (at least, I think it was a he) had aced and lied his way through one of those tests.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Owlsrayne 10 months, 2 weeks ago
    It's water under the dam now, yet anyone with a BA in Clinical Psychology would have noticed Dr. Fords flat affect and confusion during questioning that she is under the influence of some of a antipsychotic medication. The Dimm's are really at fault of convincing her to testify. they not only damaged her reputation and Judge Kavanughs'.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  blarman 10 months, 2 weeks ago
    So what we have is someone who's sole "evidence" stems from a lie detector test, yet we find out she "coached" someone else about how to beat a lie detector test.

    Nope - doesn't raise any red flags for me! [/sarcasm]
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  Stormi 10 months, 2 weeks ago
    As well it should have been by the Senators Dems did not ask about her HS binge drinking, their promiscuity, did not ask to see her yearbook. now, they want to know more! They were too busy saying how brave she was. They never checked her past, or they wold have known she lied about the polygraph, about the extra door, and so many things. Feinstein never had the letter authenticated, as it appears not to be her writing level. No one asked about her being under hypnosis or drugs to remember. I would really like to know if this broad came up with the dfea, if Soros did,nor if Feinstein was in it from the beginning. It was a sham for sure.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo