11

Diane Feinstien and Kirsten Gillibrand with Mazie Keiko Hirono castrated me at a party after calling me the N word in 2000.

Posted by Dobrien 7 years, 11 months ago to Politics
55 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Please anyone that witnessed this please come forward. BTW Sen. Blumenthal ordered them to do it. After he said he hated People of color .


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ blarman 7 years, 10 months ago
    I thought that the lawyer the Republicans brought in failed miserably. At first I thought that it would be a good choice to get an actual lawyer in there to question Ms. Ford, but she certainly didn't clear anything up. She needed to get at the heart of the allegation and point out the complete and total lack of any corroboration.

    Here's what any reasonable person would have asked:

    1) Where was this party where the alleged event took place? (She magically remembered only yesterday...)
    2) How old were you when this alleged event took place? (She claims she was 15, but only remembered yesterday...)
    3) Who else was at the event? (The other five people she claimed were there all deny any knowledge of such an event.)
    4) Who else knew you were at this event? (Parents, friends, teachers, etc. - she can't name anyone)
    5) How far away from your home was this event? (6-8 miles is the figure)
    5) Given your admission that you did not have a license and did not drive yourself, how did you arrive at the event in question? (She has no idea)
    6) Given your admission that you did not have a license and did not drive yourself home, how did you get home? (She has no idea)
    7) Who took you back to your home? (That individual would be a credible material witness to time, date, and place and could testify as to mental state of Ms. Ford at the time. Remember, her claim was that she ran out of the party emotionally traumatized and immediately left. Whomever took her home at that point could either confirm or deny Ms Ford's state of mind.
    8) Ms. Ford, is it true that you are an activist on behalf of the Democratic Party? (Yes, she is.)

    And after Ms. Ford failed to answer any of those questions, I would simply say the following:

    "Ms. Ford, in light of the lack of ANY substance to your testimony and the prior refutation of any of these events by the very people you claim to have participated, I find your story to be a complete and utter fabrication of the most heinous kind. So my next question is very simple: who put you up to this? Why are you really here?"
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by term2 7 years, 10 months ago
      The whole hearing was just to keep the repubs from looking like they were not in favor of women's rights.

      Actually, I think answering all those questions in a hearing format was stupid. It had nothing to do with the real issue- and that is how Kavanaugh would do as a SC judge. What he did 36 years ago isnt very relevant at all, and couldnt be proven at this point anyway.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 7 years, 10 months ago
      Thanks Blair,
      I agree she was worthless .Your questions would have been much more revealing then the handholding. The optics did not hurt too much though, as it might have looked heavy handed to be too tough on Ford.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ blarman 7 years, 10 months ago
        We can certainly hope so, but the Republicans had a great chance to put all of these allegations to bed with authority - and they blew it. The only thing that saved any of this were the Democrats ignoring the issue and using the platform for campaign speeches and Brett Kavanaugh's moving testimony/rebuttal, where evidence was actually brought and displayed. No reasonable person sitting on a jury would have come close to convicting Kavanaugh.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by chad 7 years, 10 months ago
      Even if she had reported this imagined event immediately to the police her recollection was so vague the police would not have been able to do any follow up work or even attempt to charge anyone with a crime. Reporting it 30 years later and giving it any credence it ludicrous.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ pixelate 7 years, 10 months ago
      Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. She has presented no evidence. She has presented only 'feels.' It will appeal to those who are led by their emotions. Individuals with a more logical bent will stare at her display with a stony face and dismiss it as without merit.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by exceller 7 years, 10 months ago
      Very relevant questions Blarman. I asked some of the same in another thread before reading your post.

      Unfortunately Rachel Mitchell was a very poor choice as a prosecutor in place of Republican Senators. Thank God some Senators took back the stage later. Mitchell was tiptoeing around facts and never made a significant dent in Ford's lies. She was clearly out of water like a duck.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by DeangalvinFL 7 years, 10 months ago
      And how about:
      9. Is it possible that a you, a young teenage girl, wanted to kiss a teenage boy at a party and went upstairs to do so. Yet another boy followed and ruined everything. When the one boy tried to kiss you anyway and the other boy kept jumping on the both of you, you really wanted to get out of there. Not a romantic first kiss but rather two minutes of stupidity.

      Yet, the two immature young boys just thought the whole thing was stupid funny and therefore don't remember it 35 years later. You testified that they were laughing the whole time.
      Is that possible?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by rainman0720 7 years, 10 months ago
    Welcome to the new Democrat standards: You must prove your innocence, I don't have to prove your guilt.

    I agree that it's nice to see Graham show some stones. Loved his quote:

    “When you see [Justice Sonia] Sotomayor and [Justice Elena] Kagan, tell ‘em Lindsey said hello because I voted for them,” he told Kavanaugh before turning again to Democrats. “I would never do to them what you’ve done to this guy.”
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by bsmith51 7 years, 10 months ago
      Standards? In Total War there is no Geneva Convention, only complete annihilation of the enemy. Don't kid yourselves. The Glorious Revolution of the left is Total War, only won when the Constitution is totally and permanently eviscerated and all those in objection are exterminated, imprisoned or cowered under the yoke of the new left regime.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 7 years, 10 months ago
    Well, give old Diane some credit. Professor Ford is about the best victim I've ever seen! Why would 2 15 year old girls be in a house with no adults and four boys 17 - 18? Boy, no wonder she didn't tell her momma what went on. My mother would have screamed until my hair fell out! NB
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by DeangalvinFL 7 years, 10 months ago
      Yes, and she testified that she had been to 4 or 5 similar parties previously where Kavanaugh and/or Mark Judge were at. She was supposedly 14 going to all of these parties, thus ready willing and able to be a teenager and kiss a boy.
      Then she goes upstairs!! No indication that she went up involuntarily. It is highly likely that she wanted to kiss one of them. Then it didn't go as she dreamed and she was upset.
      Sounds like they are both telling the truth, just from different perspectives.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 10 months ago
    This is search out and destroy time in our country for sure. That hearing was disgusting, and I think it united the republicans even more against the democrats, and that applies to the voters too.

    We dont need obstructionist democrats wasting our governmen time and resources that WE have to pay for.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 7 years, 10 months ago
      The leftist statist pukes are hanging on to the slippery sides of the swamp. They see the vortex formed and will do anything to plug the drain.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by term2 7 years, 10 months ago
        I think this hearing thing for Kavanaugh might have been a really decisive moment for the democrats- like when Hillary called her opponents "deplorable". The hearing was such an obvious circus designed to just waste time and money that it might indeed unite republicans and solidify their resistance to democrats
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 7 years, 10 months ago
    Me dino saw your castration, Dobrien. It was the tenth castration party I went to some time during the Jurassic Period of the Mesozoic Era. Methinks you tack a BC on the back of whatever year that was.
    I saw those skanks take you upstairs and saw what happened to you while escaping through the coal chute of the basement. Yes, the basement was old-fashioned because this tenth castration party happened way before the big asteroid hit.
    Anyhoo, through the coal chute is how I always escaped when I went to a castration party to have a good time.
    Heard that house is a Democrat Party headquarters now. How the big asteroid's firestorm failed to burn it I'll never know.
    Maybe those wicked skanks are into withcraft or something.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 10 months ago
    Are you willing to testify to congress?...if so, we'll let you know when the time is Ripe...er right...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 7 years, 10 months ago
      Yes but with some conditions.......
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 10 months ago
        We'll handle it any way you like...at your home, at your work, in a library, a closet or on stage in public with an angry audience...it's all up to you.

        Can you fly?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 7 years, 10 months ago
          Did I say ,I and me?
          I meant I heard this guy talking about this story that he heard from Stormy Daniel's co star on a movie set.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 10 months ago
            Better get a creepy porn lawyer near you!
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by 7 years, 10 months ago
              I need to borrow an item I would describe it as
              A decontamination suit, I need a piece of personal protective equipment that consists of an impermeable whole-body garment worn as protection against hazardous materials. Such suits are often combined with self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) to ensure a supply of breathable air.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 10 months ago
                A whole body Condom?
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by 7 years, 10 months ago
                  Make that extra large I am 6'2".
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 10 months ago
                    Wow, now that's a big "Johnson"!...snicker...
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Posted by 7 years, 10 months ago
                      I think this is how that term or
                      dick name started .pun intended.
                      (1.) President Johnson named his penis “Jumbo“ and would refer to it as such to his Congressional colleagues? He did. (Source: This review of Master of the Senate, the third installment in Caro’s LBJ series.) And that’s the tamest thing on this list. We’re just getting started here.

                      (2.) He also liked to whip “Jumbo” out to show people at work. “[I]f a colleague came into a Capitol bathroom as he was finishing at the urinal there, he would sometimes swing around still holding his member … hooting once, ‘Have you ever seen anything as big as this?,’ and shaking it in almost a brandishing manner as he began discoursing about some pending legislation.” (The New York Review of Books)

                      (3.) According to this review of A Mind of Its Own: A Cultural History of the Penis, “Lyndon B. Johnson once answered reporters badgering him about why the United States was in Vietnam with a simple, unmistakable off-the-record gesture: he unzipped, pulled out his penis and said, ‘This is why!’ ” (I do hope he sent all the widows and families a dick pic in the mail, so they would know their loved ones didn’t die in vain. “But why — why did Johnny have to die?! This war, it’s all so senseless!” [receives dick pic] “Oh. Oh wow.”)

                      (4.) When working from his Texas ranch during his presidency, LBJ liked to load a cooler of beer into his Lincoln and drive around aimlessly while having a few drinks. This forced panicked Secret Service agents to chase him, and they’d catch up when he took a pit stop. During one of these stops, a gust of wind blew Johnson’s urine onto the leg of a Secret Service agent, who said, “Sir, you’re pissing on my leg.” Johnson’s response: “I know. That’s my prerogative.” (The Secret Service: The Hidden History of an Enigmatic Agency via Cracked)
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Stormi 7 years, 10 months ago
    I'll be your witness! And we can say Ford's HS promoted racism, per her yearbook!

    I would say the investigator should ask:
    :
    Did you and classmates engage in binge drinking?
    2. Produce you yearbook Scribe 82 (photos of them making fun of Blacks, promoting drinking and promiscuity).
    You claimed a subsequent rape in your therapy, when and how did it affect you and who was that man?
    Do you take drugs, RX or other?
    Have you seen real psychiatrist in the interveneing years?
    Why did you leve MD for Calif. and what happened at your high school to make it necessary?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 7 years, 10 months ago
      And to think these people are really doing this outrageous behavior that we are mocking and too many people swallow it hook line and sinker.
      I have thought a lot about the horrible disservice to abused women every where. To bring up unsubstantiated claims of abuse to such a public forum is a slap in the face to women who have been terrorized and raped. Like Keith Ellison's ex girl friend or Eric Schniedermans girlfriend who called her his #metoo slave. Or the sex slave branded women of NXIVM who Senator Kristen Gillibrand's father lobbied for. Or the countless other true victims.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Stormi 7 years, 10 months ago
        How about the chdilren being sexually abused as part of the multi-million dollar Congressional pedophile ring, which the good Congress ladies never seem to object to. Only Trey Gowdy, with tears in his eye, spoke of his disappointment at getting no help taking it down. I read some months back it was to lucrative and they would never dismantle it. Then Ruth Bader Ginsberg was approved by these folks, and she said that pedophilia is good for children. These folks don't care about women or children.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by DeangalvinFL 7 years, 10 months ago
      Did she really claim a subsequent rape in her therapy?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Stormi 7 years, 10 months ago
        According to an article I read early on in her coming forward, they said she either was or thought she had been raped in later years.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by DeangalvinFL 7 years, 10 months ago
          Interesting.
          That could very well cause a mix up in past memories, especially 35 year old memories.

          I think it was two teenagers going upstairs to make out, then the third guy comes in to ruin all the fun. Then she has a panic attack and the hand momentarily over the mouth caused her to panic even more.
          It is implausible based on the description of events that any malice was intended nor any rape attempted. It was teenagers being teenagers.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by Stormi 7 years, 10 months ago
            I agree, no crime came close to occurring. It was likely the guy she conveniently cnnot remember at all, the sixed person at the house, which she has no information about. However, I am starting to think it is all a plot cooked up and is all fake, down to the letter, which Feinsteiin guarded so closely until it was to late to examine it in detail. They need a forensic expert evaluation of that letter, which one PhD claims is fake.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by bsmith51 7 years, 10 months ago
    Remember, the single greatest mission of the Democrat Party is now to once and for all eviscerate the Constitution that was written by white racists. That is their brass ring.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by bsmith51 7 years, 10 months ago
    It's amazing the Republicans expected a better outcome from a prosecutor than an excellent cross-examiner defense attorney.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Stormi 7 years, 10 months ago
      I agree. After reading an article by Danielle Blumenthal, PhD, claiming the letter was fake to being with,, I see maybe a China/Feinstein conspiracy possible in stopping Trump from appointing a Justice. She analyzes the letter in detail in an articl called "Bombshell: Christine B--- Ford Letter a Fake." It all makes sense. This supposed victim is fake, all her history has been scrubbed, including her supposed link to an abortion pill research She looks happy and thriving in her surfboard photos, not childish and stumbling like in the hearing. .
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo