That's about the size of it! lol!

I agree, no crime came close to occurring. It was likely the guy she conveniently cnnot remember at all, the sixed person at the house, which she has no information about. However, I am starting to think it is all a plot cooked up and is all fake, down to the letter, which Feinsteiin guarded so closely until it was to late to examine it in detail. They need a forensic expert evaluation of that letter, which one PhD claims is fake.

I agree. After reading an article by Danielle Blumenthal, PhD, claiming the letter was fake to being with,, I see maybe a China/Feinstein conspiracy possible in stopping Trump from appointing a Justice. She analyzes the letter in detail in an articl called "Bombshell: Christine B--- Ford Letter a Fake." It all makes sense. This supposed victim is fake, all her history has been scrubbed, including her supposed link to an abortion pill research She looks happy and thriving in her surfboard photos, not childish and stumbling like in the hearing. .

Very relevant questions Blarman. I asked some of the same in another thread before reading your post.

Unfortunately Rachel Mitchell was a very poor choice as a prosecutor in place of Republican Senators. Thank God some Senators took back the stage later. Mitchell was tiptoeing around facts and never made a significant dent in Ford's lies. She was clearly out of water like a duck.

Interesting.
That could very well cause a mix up in past memories, especially 35 year old memories.

I think it was two teenagers going upstairs to make out, then the third guy comes in to ruin all the fun. Then she has a panic attack and the hand momentarily over the mouth caused her to panic even more.
It is implausible based on the description of events that any malice was intended nor any rape attempted. It was teenagers being teenagers.

No doubt about it . I think we are watching the unraveling of the old guard .much will happen when Kavanaugh is approved.

Pedophiles are classified as yet another an oppressed identity group by lgbtpqiakxyzs thus those who use alt-logic feel compelled to protect them.

How about the chdilren being sexually abused as part of the multi-million dollar Congressional pedophile ring, which the good Congress ladies never seem to object to. Only Trey Gowdy, with tears in his eye, spoke of his disappointment at getting no help taking it down. I read some months back it was to lucrative and they would never dismantle it. Then Ruth Bader Ginsberg was approved by these folks, and she said that pedophilia is good for children. These folks don't care about women or children.

According to an article I read early on in her coming forward, they said she either was or thought she had been raped in later years.

How dare you expect that she would have some responsibility in her behavior. Every one should be a victim not a victor.

It is a political hit job. The left have boundless energy when it comes to destroying reason with emotion.

And to think these people are really doing this outrageous behavior that we are mocking and too many people swallow it hook line and sinker.
I have thought a lot about the horrible disservice to abused women every where. To bring up unsubstantiated claims of abuse to such a public forum is a slap in the face to women who have been terrorized and raped. Like Keith Ellison's ex girl friend or Eric Schniedermans girlfriend who called her his #metoo slave. Or the sex slave branded women of NXIVM who Senator Kristen Gillibrand's father lobbied for. Or the countless other true victims.

Even if she had reported this imagined event immediately to the police her recollection was so vague the police would not have been able to do any follow up work or even attempt to charge anyone with a crime. Reporting it 30 years later and giving it any credence it ludicrous.

Did she really claim a subsequent rape in her therapy?

Yes, and she testified that she had been to 4 or 5 similar parties previously where Kavanaugh and/or Mark Judge were at. She was supposedly 14 going to all of these parties, thus ready willing and able to be a teenager and kiss a boy.
Then she goes upstairs!! No indication that she went up involuntarily. It is highly likely that she wanted to kiss one of them. Then it didn't go as she dreamed and she was upset.
Sounds like they are both telling the truth, just from different perspectives.

And how about:
9. Is it possible that a you, a young teenage girl, wanted to kiss a teenage boy at a party and went upstairs to do so. Yet another boy followed and ruined everything. When the one boy tried to kiss you anyway and the other boy kept jumping on the both of you, you really wanted to get out of there. Not a romantic first kiss but rather two minutes of stupidity.

Yet, the two immature young boys just thought the whole thing was stupid funny and therefore don't remember it 35 years later. You testified that they were laughing the whole time.
Is that possible?

I'll be your witness! And we can say Ford's HS promoted racism, per her yearbook!

I would say the investigator should ask:
:
Did you and classmates engage in binge drinking?
2. Produce you yearbook Scribe 82 (photos of them making fun of Blacks, promoting drinking and promiscuity).
You claimed a subsequent rape in your therapy, when and how did it affect you and who was that man?
Do you take drugs, RX or other?
Have you seen real psychiatrist in the interveneing years?
Why did you leve MD for Calif. and what happened at your high school to make it necessary?

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. She has presented no evidence. She has presented only 'feels.' It will appeal to those who are led by their emotions. Individuals with a more logical bent will stare at her display with a stony face and dismiss it as without merit.

Based on a graphic novel, Kick Ass (2010) and Kick Ass 2 (2013) are fun to watch.
But in the first flick, Chloe Grace Moretz, who plays Hit Girl is a little kid and in the second flick she's the age of a high school girl, impossibly aging about 10 years as far as the flick release dates are concerned.
For some reason the makers of the first flick didn't release it for theater viewing for an extraordinary long time after making it.

At least that secret service agent can now, join the #MeTOO movement. Good thing there was no facebook back then...
Probably inspired wiener man.

I think this is how that term or
dick name started .pun intended.
(1.) President Johnson named his penis “Jumbo“ and would refer to it as such to his Congressional colleagues? He did. (Source: This review of Master of the Senate, the third installment in Caro’s LBJ series.) And that’s the tamest thing on this list. We’re just getting started here.

(2.) He also liked to whip “Jumbo” out to show people at work. “[I]f a colleague came into a Capitol bathroom as he was finishing at the urinal there, he would sometimes swing around still holding his member … hooting once, ‘Have you ever seen anything as big as this?,’ and shaking it in almost a brandishing manner as he began discoursing about some pending legislation.” (The New York Review of Books)

(3.) According to this review of A Mind of Its Own: A Cultural History of the Penis, “Lyndon B. Johnson once answered reporters badgering him about why the United States was in Vietnam with a simple, unmistakable off-the-record gesture: he unzipped, pulled out his penis and said, ‘This is why!’ ” (I do hope he sent all the widows and families a dick pic in the mail, so they would know their loved ones didn’t die in vain. “But why — why did Johnny have to die?! This war, it’s all so senseless!” [receives dick pic] “Oh. Oh wow.”)

(4.) When working from his Texas ranch during his presidency, LBJ liked to load a cooler of beer into his Lincoln and drive around aimlessly while having a few drinks. This forced panicked Secret Service agents to chase him, and they’d catch up when he took a pit stop. During one of these stops, a gust of wind blew Johnson’s urine onto the leg of a Secret Service agent, who said, “Sir, you’re pissing on my leg.” Johnson’s response: “I know. That’s my prerogative.” (The Secret Service: The Hidden History of an Enigmatic Agency via Cracked)

Lawsuits used to be won when someone did not using the term, “alleged” before guilt was established by a court of law. These days, not so much.

Wow, now that's a big "Johnson"!...snicker...

Good point.

They are very Orwellian. No due process.
It used to be that we would use Alleged of the accused versus a term that in English assumes quilt..