Ayn Rand on Politics

Posted by mminnick 6 years, 8 months ago to Politics
3 comments | Share | Flag




The answers given by ethics determine how man should treat other men, and this determines the fourth branch of philosophy: politics, which defines the principles of a proper social system. As an example of philosophy’s function, political philosophy will not tell you how much rationed gas you should be given and on which day of the week — it will tell you whether the government has the right to impose any rationing on anything.

“Philosophy: Who Needs It”

Ayn Rand, Philosophy: Who Needs It, pg 4


All Comments

  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by mshupe 6 years, 8 months ago
    Thanks, and certainly Americans have singularly benefitted from Enlightenment individualism, but today most reject it, and have accepted the dominant philosophy of altruism, and emote it everywhere all the time.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 6 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    :Most people in this country, as a result of the Enlightenment, have had at least an implicit philosophy of individualism and have resisted statist impositions like rationing. That has not been "no more than a random collection of contradictions emoted". They did not need to be dissuaded from overt intrusions like rationing.

    But their individualist sense of life had no commonly acknowledged explicit philosophic principles and understanding by which to defend it, making them vulnerable to the more explicit collectivism of establishment intellectuals. Religious beliefs in faith and altruism opposing reason and egoism have only made it worse, making them more vulnerable.

    As American individualism has been increasingly undermined, the 'natural' resistance to statism has weakened. Ayn Rand was very clear about what needs to be done: Spread the proper philosophical ideas until they dominate the culture with understanding that can be defended. There are no short cuts.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by mshupe 6 years, 8 months ago
    The question is this. Outside of religion, most involved in public discourse have no regard for philosophy other than the random collection of contradictions they emote. Their vision of a proper social system is not rational. So how do you propose dissuading them about rationing?
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo