Mexican Citizen Arrested In US For 10th Time
Arrested for a burglary charge, Senor Sergio Ninez Barrera is only in competition for which revolving door illegal immigrant can be the poster boy of why we need that wall Dems and RINOs have no use for.
From the article~
"This is {an} outstanding example of our law enforcement community working together and taking a criminal off the streets," Chief Patrol Agent Douglas Harrison said in a statement.
Gulch Gazette Reporter Dino Allosaurus Esquire III would like to ask Agent Harrison if Senor Barrera may be stopped from burglarizing at all during his upcoming eleventh visit.
From the article~
"This is {an} outstanding example of our law enforcement community working together and taking a criminal off the streets," Chief Patrol Agent Douglas Harrison said in a statement.
Gulch Gazette Reporter Dino Allosaurus Esquire III would like to ask Agent Harrison if Senor Barrera may be stopped from burglarizing at all during his upcoming eleventh visit.
A trailer scene snippet: Soldier in full body armor stands on sand bags waving a sword over a row of machine gun nests.
Dialogue~"Wait until you see the whites of their zombie eyes!"
That must be because Democrats are really fat-headedly all puffed up with themselves about how freakishly tolerant they are. .
As for chip. Combine with drones and automated turrets. 3x, no mercy
Offensive? So is what people in Arizona have had to deal with bubbling up from Mexico.
I can't wait for the wall and actual enforcement.
That law a partial result of prison overcrowding, new Alabama prisons were being built during the 80s and are now bursting at the seams.
Me dino began work at one of the new one during 1982. By the late 90s, general population two-man cells were being converted into three-man cells by maintenance simply welding on a new bunk to the wall over the two-bunk stack.
Having seen what I've seen, there is no way I can be tempted to do anything to get me dino sent to an Alabama prison.
However, blarman's point, without the hyperbole, has some validity. Why let repeat criminals out? At some point have they not proven themselves to be criminals? Isn't prison the place for such people to be?
Also, the previous comment posters are referring to another story about a small group in Arizona unrelated to the article. Those folks seemed, from reported info, to have been promoting terrorism.
Yes, my response was hyperbolic, because it illustrates the absurdity - not only of his behavior but of the government response. My response was only half tongue-in-cheek, however. What is the most effective method of preventing future crimes? Harsh punishment. That's been proven. The murder rate has skyrocketed since capital punishment has been taken off the table (for all but the most egregious crimes). The number of illegals crossing the borders has skyrocketed since Obama refused to enforce the laws. And on and on.
But it is similarly absurd to criticize me for advocating "illegal government executions or vigilantism." I did no such thing and you know it. If you want to call me out for hyperbole, you'd better not use it yourself either.
The guy was convicted of various crimes AND illegal entry TEN TIMES. Not once. Not twice. TEN TIMES. A fact you want to ignore because you don't believe that borders or border laws mean anything. To you, it is neither invasion nor is it a breach of property rights but merely an inconvenient law you wish would disappear. And so because you wish it would disappear, you downplay it, even though it is a critical point in the entire debate. You try to paint me as being the "illogical" and "dishonest" one when it is you who are dissembling. Post flagged and downvoted for inflammatory remarks and dishonesty.
I did not quote him with the phrase "illegal government executions or vigilantism"; he said he wants the burglar to be "executed", and I said "Please do not use this forum to advocate illegal government executions or vigilantism" -- because that is the only way to do what he advocates.
He's now shouting that "TEN CRIMES" as "critical" somehow justifies his position (at first he claimed three was the criterion), then dishonestly claims that I "don't believe that borders or border laws mean anything", which obviously is not true and has nothing to do with his calls for "execution". It is Blarman who is "engaging in inflammatory remarks and dishonesty" contrary to the guidelines for this forum.
“Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of Boy Scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it... There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Rearden, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with.”
― Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged