New Hampshire is too white.
According to a Columbian immigrant she has only found a maid who she can speak Spanish to.
- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
Not to mention a national language kinda like the ones (keeping this simple) used in Germany, France, Italy and, oh, yeah, Spain.
How can it be that a Columbian immigrant - I love Columbia by the way - is looked to as a spokesperson for how New Hampshire "should" be?
Can you imagine an American going down to Columbia and stating that too many Latinos are here, this place really needs to change. The Government needs to import a million Pakistanis and a million Chinese and a million Nigerians. Or some other absurdity.
What the hell is wrong with being white?
Africa is too black. What can we do about this terrible situation? Perhaps a special deportation committee. I can see half the continent lining up to get the hell out. Madness.
"Send in the dodo birds and a free tuxedo for all."
If she wants to speak Spanish why doesn't she move to a Spanish speaking country?
It's an amazing real life view of who the majority really are.
And That's in the Commie/psychopathic state of Conn-ecticut!!!
We should ALL move to New Hampshire and make it our Gulch.
I do have pretty good evidence of an American Indian woman four generations back. Not completely definitive, but I don’t care that much. Some guy came up to my brother and asked him if he did because of the way his beard grew. Not sure if there is any validity to it, but it is interesting too.
Watch antifla white idiots shout out the black Candace Owens as a racist.
https://www.conservativereview.com/ne...
During Obama the message was to make communities that were "too white" import minorities so to increase the crime rate.
Last time I looked the USA was a nation of mostly white people although that will change soon given the reproduction rate of minorities.
BTW, when was the last time these liberals concluded that Africa was too black?
Why does so many attack the concept of liberal when they are not the real problem?
Let me start by saying that I am a classical liberal as liberal connotates progression, not progressive. The liberal mind is what advances mankind whereas the conservation wants to preserve status quo. If this country were to promote a completely conservative thought then we would still be using horse and buggy as the main means of transport.
Now from a political standpoint I can understand a conservative approach as a mechanism of government control but then reality has shown that really does not work.
Is it only I that somehow sees that whether the red team or blue team is in power that the progression of enslavement of the people never really changes.
So it's not really a liberal hysteria as much as a new age progressive criteria that is at play.
Not that I really blame your argument as I have caught myself many times using that false dichotomy of liberal when I actually mean progressive. It just seems the logical thing to do until one stops and examines their premises.
Odumbo was a modern enigma of contrast. He really wasn't elected as much as selected. I mean seriously, John McCain was a demented soul that followed him around like a little lap dog.
The owners had no doubt at all at who would end up where. But what a perfect little puppet. Odumbo wasn't a liberal at all as demonstrated by his continual efforts to stop progress. He could be said to be the poster child for Galt's pledge to stop the world in opposition to the communist slogan, "to each by his ability to each by his needs."
I totally agree with your assessment of the change in the majority status of white reproduction which bought into the myth of population growth while all other races have been going at it like rabbits. The only difference being rabbits are at the bottom of the food chain.
And if one where to pay attention to South Africa, Africa is definitely not too black.
That is patently untrue but you are free to believe whatever you want. There were many great individuals who contributed to the advancement if the country and her people on the conservative side but I can't say the same for the liberal left.
Now I agree with your that "liberal" is not always associated with the left: there are many liberals on the right.
As for South Africa, I was not talking about SA: I was referring to the continent which is predominantly black. SA was an artificial state set up by whites only to be gradually reverting it back to a black state, a process which is ongoing.
By this example America should revert the PC drive for "inclusiveness" since the country has predominantly been white from its inception.
Your argument states that my statement was patently untrue but it offers nothing but an opinion and not a very strong one at that. But we will get to that in a moment. First let's address the false dichotomy of your statement. The argument seems to be based on the refusal to separate the private from the political. Your argument is focused on the political which is a false argument in itself. The only real difference form a political standpoint is one wants to steal more money while the other want to steal more rights but in reality they are one and the same. There is no liberal side of political as government in and of itself is a hindrance, not a supporter of advancement.
Now from the private side, which you argument has confused with the political. Conservatives on the private side are normally the finance side of an operation. They are most always in opposition to advancement because of the drain on cash for research. They have been the death of many a company when control is by a finance executive.
And again the false dichotomy with right and left. Where are the moderates that believe both any swing to any side is excess? How do you account that the far right and the far left lead to the same result, collectivism.
Again your argument is blatantly false, the left is not right nor is the right left. That would be to accept the false epistemology that A can be B at the same time in the same instance. It does not follow but destroys logic. It is a sign of the phenomena of moral relativism, the presence of truth and morality in the lives of the people of any given society is inversely proportional to the presence of tyranny and slavery in that society. True freedom can never exist in a society that embraces "Moral Relativism" (the idea that there is no inherent and objective difference between right and wrong, so humanity may arbitrarily "create" or "decide" right and wrong for themselves).
The false premises of your argument continue. Your claim is that we eliminate South Africa because even though it is in Africa if would skew your results. Ok, then how do you account for the Arab population of Morocco, Algeria, Libya and Egypt that total some 150 million of 15 percent of the population?
And the last part your argument isn't even worth addressing.
Conservatism in it's natural environment saves that which has proven valuable and moves on from there, (that's how the advancement of consciousness is supposed to work.).
Conservatism and liberalism are not much more than a political label these days.
I agree, as in the book 1984, they are attempting to destroy the language so as to limit any conversation that has meaning.
I could not care about color, I care about character.
Fully agree.
This isn't true. Home Depot is in NH.