So, Strzok and Page are involved in an affair while he is still married and she knew it. This in my mind makes both liars! Not sure what their current status is now, together or not, but pretty sure he remains with his wife and Page is out of a job and the butt of many jokes while he still has a job and wife. See where I am going with this. I would not believe a word that either one of them says nor would I put any stock in either of their testimony. Dishonesty runs deep and once a liar always a liar!
Strzok is a clown, but an evil clown. Don't write him off. He is determined to make his mark somehow, and it won't be http://pretty.It would be best to put him away as soon as possible. Trump should be busily cleaning house, from the Comeys to the Rosensteins, and all the rest of the slimy critters who inhabit the swamp.He has straightened the ship of state so that it is no longer keeling over entirely. Time now to get the rats to abandon ship and then get back to fixing all the other garbage, later.
So the Strzok "hearing" received extensive coverage, with the left cheering how he "defied" Trump.
Lisa Page went into the cave three days ago for closed sessions. Apparently she testified that the emails meant what they said, in direct contradiction to Strzok's claim that there was nothing to them.
My question: I am not wondering why the MSM remained mum about her testimony but even the WSJ decided not to say a word.
The WSJ has become a tabloid rag and its inclinations are all too obvious when you are paying attention. But to ignore Page's testimony while reporting on Stormy Daniels day after day is a bit too much to swallow.
The WSJ has been a tool used by Wall St looters for decades. It's nice to know you've recognized some of their guilt, exceller. Richard Ney revealed some of this in a couple of books he wrote years ago, Wall St Jungle and Wall St Gang. The looting goes on today.
They're already here!!!!
Lisa Page went into the cave three days ago for closed sessions. Apparently she testified that the emails meant what they said, in direct contradiction to Strzok's claim that there was nothing to them.
My question: I am not wondering why the MSM remained mum about her testimony but even the WSJ decided not to say a word.
The WSJ has become a tabloid rag and its inclinations are all too obvious when you are paying attention. But to ignore Page's testimony while reporting on Stormy Daniels day after day is a bit too much to swallow.
Richard Ney revealed some of this in a couple of books he wrote years ago, Wall St Jungle and Wall St Gang. The looting goes on today.
Watch this one . Very interesting.
https://youtu.be/RsKafawy-CU
engrossed the whole time...
Your welcome, you will like this post.
https://youtu.be/JqxVQfiHos8
DOB
Thanks, again.