Yeah, Justice Gin, our Constitution is just a ye olde ancient document that says We The People are equal and can govern ourselves without being ruled by an elite class of more than equal above the law betters who can get away with stuff like privileged aristocrats and The Evil Hag.
Uh . . . hey, what's going on here? Me dino don't get it.

This should be no surprise. Ginsberg has been an anti-American activist her whole life. To her, everything and everybody that's pro USA is evil. But even though she's now a withered old lady, her mind is as sharp as ever. Do appearances deceive? In this case, Yes! But, thanks to Obama she has been rewarded by being on the Supreme Court. Yet they criticise Trump for his selections. Hah! If it was up to them, SCOTUS would be all socialists and the Constitution be damned.

First, let me apologize for this tome. In his book “The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates“ (Mentor, 1986) author Ralph Ketchum wrote the following in his introduction:

“As the federal convention assembled in May 1787, its members did agree, though, on some basic principles and use of terms. All believed in government by consent, which in 18th-century understanding included (1) constitutional monarchy, where the monarchs powers were limited and where the government included an assembly elected by the people; (2) a republic, meaning some forms of representative government without a hereditary executive; and (3) democracy which meant either town meeting style democracy or simply the direct voice of the people within a government. The revolutionary struggle against the government of George III left the constitutional monarchy in ill-repute in America.….Equally discredited was “mere democracy“ which still meant, as Aristotle had taught, rule by the passionate, ignorant, demagogue-dominated “voice of the people“. This was sure to produce first injustice, then anarchy, and finally tyranny. Hence virtually all shades of opinion reviled monarchy and democracy, and, publicly at least, affirmed republicanism.”

One need only revisit The Federalist Papers, or The Anti-Federalist Papers and read some of the writings of the Founding Fathers, or the transcripts of the debates during the Constitutional Convention, to realize just how far away from the government of the Constitution we really are. That realization is exceptionally distressing.
We have come so far away from the Founders’ intent, not by Amendment of the Constitution, not by Law, not by vote, or any other legitimate means, but by (1) an Executive Branch that has ignored the Constitution in proposing and enforcing the laws of the United States; (2) a Congress that likewise ignored the Constitution and assumed far more power than the Constitution allows; (3) a Judicial Branch which has likewise ignored the Constitution and its meaning in favor of creating “constitutional rights” that don’t exist in the Constitution, legislating from the bench, and deciding cases on the basis of personal opinion rather than constitutional principle; (4) any number of politicians, state, federal or local, who have taken the position, often publicly, that the Constitution is out of date and should be revised or replaced for their own ends; and, finally, (5) a populace that knows little or nothing about the Constitution, and which, as the prophet predicted, vote for those who promise them the greatest largess at public expense.

As Ginsburg notes, we have the oldest, still in force Constitution in the world. It has served us well over the last 240 years. And that fact should be a badge of honor that we wear for the world. And if you read it and understand it, you know that the principles and functions of the government it describes are timeless and basic to self government by the people, the right of the people to Liberty, the right of the people to pursue life, liberty and happiness on their own terms, and limited government that assures protection of the rights listed therein. Ginsburg would have us look to Socialist/Globalist/egalitarian documents to write a Constitution. That tells us a lot about where her 86-year old addled head is. That’s why we need to get rid or her and her ilk. And we as a populace need to stand up and throw out the lying politicians, the activist judges, and the corrupt government officials. Now.

How can one be on SCOTUS yet doesn't believe in the constitution she swore to uphold.

Why are Feminists always so concerned with "rights" and never with "responsibilities"?

In my view, The Constitution is merely the basis for law. We had no say in being born a citizen of the USA but when we become "of age" we accept responsibility for ourselves. If we decide to remain in the USA, we have agreed to obey the law based on the Constitution, nothing else. We put up with violations of our inalienable rights because we haven't been pushed to the end of our rope and that there is still hope that those violations will be stopped.

If any part of the Constitution becomes unworkable, we have a way of amending it but that way is not a judge ignoring the meaning and intent and substituting something in its place from the bench. Loyalty on the part of the military, as well as the citizens is to the Constitution, period. While every individual is not a Constitutional lawyer, over time, actions by the government that undermine the basis of its existence will have consequences.

Justice Ginsburg is indeed on the record as having endorsed lowering the age of consent to 12. When she was a law professor at Columbia, she, Brenda Feigen-Fasteau, former director of the ACLU's Women's Rights Project, and 15 law students put together a report for the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. The report, released in 1977, gave as one of its "Recommendations" (p. 102):

18 U.S.C. §2032 — Eliminate the phrase "carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife who has not attained the age of sixteen years" and substitute a Federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense patterned after S. 1400 §1633: A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and (1) compels the other person to participate: (A) by force or (B) by threatening or placing the other person in fear that any person will imminently be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping; (2) has substantially impaired the other person's power to appraise or control the conduct by administering or employing a drug or intoxicant without the knowledge or against the will of such other person, or by other means; or (3) the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old.

When Clintons heard about her she was a shoe in.

WHY has this video of Ginsburg not been shown on national tv??? it is apparently available here on the internet. Is it a question of having the balls to do it? Maybe save it till just before or during the hearings on Kavanaugh. It would sure put the liberals in a tough spot

Egads! She is one one of those "Ancient Aliens". She must be a Reptiod with faux human flesh covering. Maybe she is from an alternate reality where everything is different. Somebody rip her face off and if there is an Alien there.

Ginsburg is the same one who said that pedophilia is good fro children. She has apparently no repect for the Constitution, the innocence of children, nor our American way of life. the Storm may not have broken yet, but Stormi is raging after this week and all the idiots on TV and DC!

Looks like Apple just removed the Qanon app from their store for IOS devices. It hit their top 10 paid app list. People paid 99 cents to have an app for Q messages.

Are we in a situation that will need the militia to save our country?

The Dems will go crazy when the old bat dies or has to retire.
She also wanted to have funding for abortions written into the constitution.