(8) Chemplane Sprays a Rainbow Around Orbs & Disappears - Literally

Posted by  $  nickursis 5 months, 3 weeks ago to Science
22 comments | Share | Flag

This is interesting, if just because it is a decent demonstration of something that seems beyond a "contrail". Contrails will normally form from either water vapor from the engines, or low pressure edges from wing tips and appendages. This seems to indicate a cutoff of material being dispensed vice a sudden change in atmosphere. If you look at old bomber film, or even 50's/60's film, it was always above 20,000 feet, and because of cold, vapor laden air.
SOURCE URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1EU7IaMM_k


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by  $  allosaur 5 months, 3 weeks ago
    It's the attack of the orb. The attacked disintegrating plane leaves a chemical trail of itself until it vanishes.
    "Mayday" cannot be called because the radio's molecules are breaking up but then again there may be no one aboard due to this being a remotely controlled test..
    In either case, the fuel cannot explode because chemically it is no longer fuel.
    Why isn't the disintegrating plane falling out of the sky? Tractor beam.
    Save for the chance video, we will never hear of this event because we don't need to know and me dino knows we don't need to know due having seen Men In Black flicks.
    Now someone explain to me why me dino's outlandish theory cannot be viable as a theory.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  Your_Name_Goes_Here 5 months, 3 weeks ago
    Call me a denier I suppose. There are probably more than 100,000 pilots in the US alone, and they are ALL involved in a mysterious conspiracy? To what end? And how could this many people keep such a secret?

    There's nothing unusual in this guy's still photos. The "rainbow" is just that - a rainbow caused by diffraction of sunlight through the ice particles formed by what appear to be four engines operating at an altitude conducive to their formation (remember that differing altitudes do not have the same relative humidity, and therefore some altitudes are more conducive than others in the formation of condensation trails).

    As to the disappearing plane? The limited dynamic range of his camera is causing that effect to occur.

    Simple explanations are usually the correct explanations. Just my $0.02, YMMV.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  5 months, 3 weeks ago
      Ok, well thats OK, as I have not ran into many people who are ready to think our glorious leaders would not put a covert plan into place to "save the earth" in spite of the unwashed masses refusal to kowtow to their pontifications that it is ending because of the evil CO2. Here is a video a little over an hour long that seems to be a fairly good summary of all the facts as they perceive them. The arguments they make are fairly convincing, IMHO, due to my total lack of trust in the government NOT deciding "they know best".


      https://youtu.be/d8bk3NyB31M
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  Dobrien 5 months, 3 weeks ago
    Hi Nickursis,
    I have no doubt these trails are more than condensation living near a major metro airport
    For fifty years watching planes . The trails last literally for hours. I have posted on this topic. A lot of deniers
    One response was that military jets use certain chemicals in the fuel . It made more sense then most responses. Mostly contrails as a reason for the extended nano particles trail. I often view multiple planes at the same time most do not have any contrail at all and the same time lines can be criss crossing the sky.
    In the video it was a good example. The disappearing plane was not very convincing it looked pretty normal to me. Once the spray was turned off pin pointing a high altitude plane would
    Of course be more difficult te see after 45 seconds.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  Your_Name_Goes_Here 5 months, 3 weeks ago
      I don’t believe it is true that military jets as a whole use different fuel than the good old “kerojet” that is used by the civilian airliners (notable exception was the SR-71 that used an exotic formulation of fuel). Did your friend offer specifics on the differences?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by  $  Dobrien 5 months, 3 weeks ago
        From this

        Posted by DrZarkov99 2 months ago
        The various metals she lists have been commonly used by the U.S. military as additives to fuel, primarily for better performance, range, and resisting evaporation in hot climates, or freezing at high altitude. The exact compound makeup is classified, and she should have been told it was a need to know. The geoengineering idea doesn't wash. I used to be part of a team involved in "weather war" studies, where we were examining the possibility of turning the weather into a kind of weapon, and we realized rather quickly that the amount of material needed to have even a limited local effect was prohibitively high. She does have a point that only a limited list of metals are now considered pollutants, and should be the subject of further study. Even a conspiracy theory can sometimes be partially right.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  5 months, 3 weeks ago
      The turn off thing was more my focus as it showed they were discharging something. Granted you might argue they moved into warmer air, but there are other videos that show planes going one way spewing forth and planes going the other way with nothing, which totally refutes the air change theory.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by  $  Dobrien 5 months, 3 weeks ago
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by  $  5 months, 3 weeks ago
          Incredibly interesting and illuminating, not to mention Lionel is about the most animated interviewer you can find. The guy was so calm and sedate it was like night and day. The implicaions are staggering, but I just cannot imagine some kind of program that is clearly self destructive. As he said towards the end, the materials are moisture absorbing, and then bond with the metals, and the aluminum load in the environment will become toxic to everything. Good grief, criminals infesting our government and then trying to kill us all to "save the planet"? That is the one part I still can't see, it is like exploding dirty nukes to have a little nuclear winter action, fixes one problem and creates another. Carbon removal and encapsulation seems easier and not destructive, so I wonder if there is yet another hidden agenda here?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo