Uh, ok.

This is total BS. There is nothing irregular or mysterious about this. Talk about making something out of nothing, Video and good performance to not make truth. This is garbage. Normal atmospheric occurrences.

Here is whatt the CDC says about aluminium

https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/phs/phs.asp...

It doesn't seem like very much in the way of studies have been done regarding toxicity, but some of their empirical examples did not go well:

https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles...

The empirical link to Alzheimers seems somewhat valid:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2...

Also, do not pooh pooh the whole idea, as it has been actually reported as an active experiment to geoengineer and control climate change:

https://www.theguardian.com/environme...

Thank you for this, it is very interesting.However, their logic would seem somewhat off, as modern engines are at least 50% more efficient, and burn less fuel than previous engines, so the amount of gases would seem to be less available in a more efficient engine as total volume to convert to gases would be less, so I am not seeing it all ties together well.

Ok, well thats OK, as I have not ran into many people who are ready to think our glorious leaders would not put a covert plan into place to "save the earth" in spite of the unwashed masses refusal to kowtow to their pontifications that it is ending because of the evil CO2. Here is a video a little over an hour long that seems to be a fairly good summary of all the facts as they perceive them. The arguments they make are fairly convincing, IMHO, due to my total lack of trust in the government NOT deciding "they know best".


https://youtu.be/d8bk3NyB31M

Well I stand corrected then. It does make sense, as the service ceiling for certain military aircraft is likely to be above Class A airspace.

There's no theory like a make someone happy theory,

😂

From this

Posted by DrZarkov99 2 months ago
The various metals she lists have been commonly used by the U.S. military as additives to fuel, primarily for better performance, range, and resisting evaporation in hot climates, or freezing at high altitude. The exact compound makeup is classified, and she should have been told it was a need to know. The geoengineering idea doesn't wash. I used to be part of a team involved in "weather war" studies, where we were examining the possibility of turning the weather into a kind of weapon, and we realized rather quickly that the amount of material needed to have even a limited local effect was prohibitively high. She does have a point that only a limited list of metals are now considered pollutants, and should be the subject of further study. Even a conspiracy theory can sometimes be partially right.

It's the attack of the orb. The attacked disintegrating plane leaves a chemical trail of itself until it vanishes.
"Mayday" cannot be called because the radio's molecules are breaking up but then again there may be no one aboard due to this being a remotely controlled test..
In either case, the fuel cannot explode because chemically it is no longer fuel.
Why isn't the disintegrating plane falling out of the sky? Tractor beam.
Save for the chance video, we will never hear of this event because we don't need to know and me dino knows we don't need to know due having seen Men In Black flicks.
Now someone explain to me why me dino's outlandish theory cannot be viable as a theory.

I don’t believe it is true that military jets as a whole use different fuel than the good old “kerojet” that is used by the civilian airliners (notable exception was the SR-71 that used an exotic formulation of fuel). Did your friend offer specifics on the differences?

For the less than scientifically endowed here:

https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-hig...

That is, it seems a way that some of these nefarious acts are dismissed. Who in their right mind would.......
regarding posting this most on the gulch have no interest.
see I was down voted for my first response.
This whistleblower was convincing to me but not many others.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHm0XhtDyZA

Call me a denier I suppose. There are probably more than 100,000 pilots in the US alone, and they are ALL involved in a mysterious conspiracy? To what end? And how could this many people keep such a secret?

There's nothing unusual in this guy's still photos. The "rainbow" is just that - a rainbow caused by diffraction of sunlight through the ice particles formed by what appear to be four engines operating at an altitude conducive to their formation (remember that differing altitudes do not have the same relative humidity, and therefore some altitudes are more conducive than others in the formation of condensation trails).

As to the disappearing plane? The limited dynamic range of his camera is causing that effect to occur.

Simple explanations are usually the correct explanations. Just my $0.02, YMMV.

I've never been observant enough to wonder about that stuff. Unless it was like "The Day The Earth Stood Still" I would never notice.

Yep, I went there while the video was running to see what they had. That and an article where a farmer lost 600 beehives in Canada right after they sprayed an insecticide on a cornfield next door, made me wonder about all the connections and why anyone would be stupid enough to break an ecology.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/ch...

I would say we could post that video in the Science section, and see if it explodes or not...... some people would listen...

Incredibly interesting and illuminating, not to mention Lionel is about the most animated interviewer you can find. The guy was so calm and sedate it was like night and day. The implicaions are staggering, but I just cannot imagine some kind of program that is clearly self destructive. As he said towards the end, the materials are moisture absorbing, and then bond with the metals, and the aluminum load in the environment will become toxic to everything. Good grief, criminals infesting our government and then trying to kill us all to "save the planet"? That is the one part I still can't see, it is like exploding dirty nukes to have a little nuclear winter action, fixes one problem and creates another. Carbon removal and encapsulation seems easier and not destructive, so I wonder if there is yet another hidden agenda here?

https://youtu.be/d8bk3NyB31M

The turn off thing was more my focus as it showed they were discharging something. Granted you might argue they moved into warmer air, but there are other videos that show planes going one way spewing forth and planes going the other way with nothing, which totally refutes the air change theory.

Hi Nickursis,
I have no doubt these trails are more than condensation living near a major metro airport
For fifty years watching planes . The trails last literally for hours. I have posted on this topic. A lot of deniers
One response was that military jets use certain chemicals in the fuel . It made more sense then most responses. Mostly contrails as a reason for the extended nano particles trail. I often view multiple planes at the same time most do not have any contrail at all and the same time lines can be criss crossing the sky.
In the video it was a good example. The disappearing plane was not very convincing it looked pretty normal to me. Once the spray was turned off pin pointing a high altitude plane would
Of course be more difficult te see after 45 seconds.