About public toilets: What is the fuss? Is everyone who has to pull down their pants in there imminently going to engage in sex? Possibly involuntarily? And would a transgender male want to be in a women's room to rape females, or to avoid violence in a men's room? Or if interested in attracting males, would s/he not rather hunt for contacts in a men's room? Is not the entire prohibition of sex rooted in religious strictures, claiming it as "the original sin"?

I've never understood why in men's rooms the urinals are unshielded, open to everyone's view. What's the deal there? "Mine's bigger than yours"?

That was painful to watch. It was also not entirely surprising as these students are in Seattle. I am grateful to know that my college days are three decades behind me.

These poor idiots are over-thinking things. They are more concerned with what other people say than what reality - and their own eyes - tell them.

Well, it's nice to know that our young people are so tolerant and open-minded and non-judgmental on gender issues. They accept what individuals in their individualistic individualism want to be. They seem to have swallowed whole-cloth the notion that women are not just baby machines and that males are not just sexual predators. Yet in the final analysis, the purpose of life is primarily one thing: reproducing itself. All else is window-dressing, facilitations of conditions for survival, from technologicalized food production to the most complex thought systems mankind has invented to justify its actions in the pursuit of that survival, including group collectivism and other-group genocide. With all that looming over us, by all means let's fret about which toilet to be allowed to pee in.

Men and women ARE different. If they wern't there wouldn't BE any men and women.

I would have loved the interviewer to ask the big dope in the yellow striped shirt, "So, you would be OK with sleeping with another person as long as that person identifies as a female, Right"? "You would be OK with reaching below and coming up with a handful of parts, Right"?
There is of course every possibility his/her or it's answer could be yes but IMO he ought to just take what ever he can get.

Yes. See below.

Yes. Without the differential ability to produce offspring, there would be no men and women.
Me dino could expand on this but the question is essentially answered.
Mr. Perv, stay out of the restrooms and showers used by my nieces and grandnieces or me dino will rip your head off.
Have a nice day.

Snowflakes remind me of The Wet Nurse in Atlas Shrugged. Their parents have failed them. Their schools have failed them. Now it is up to them to find the truth. I hope it is not too late for them.

Puke-provoking!!

It is a great question for a young leftist. It compels rational thought, by a leftist that is. Their convoluted answers can be used to determine how much the deprogramming will be required.

Thought? Where?

Based on the comments by these students, I think America needs a Constitutional amendment ending universal suffrage and requiring property ownership and passing a test on law, history and current events before anyone is able to vote.
If these students are a representative sample of young people, no one under 30 should be allowed to vote unless they can tell the difference between men and women (using my definition, of course;^)

The PC Nazi's have prevailed with these snowflakes. You can see the confusion in their faces as they hear their own answer.
Off to a safe place with a nookie and binky.

Only the delete rulelessers will live in utopia...the rest of us will live in HELL on earth.

It is not about the question itself. Is about the collectivist bent answers kids are giving these days.
If a growing number of innocent kids can be programmed by leftist to be evolved followers of a Marxist cult showing almost no cognative dissonance even on this evidently obvious question, where will the future of society be led?
It won’t be utopia.

The most inane thing to "think" about. I did not watch the video b/c I am fully aware of what it is about. The most frightening thing is that our young people are exposed to corrosive ideas where they should be learning critical thinking. It is not "thought-provoking" as some people think.

Didn't watch the video. The asking of the question has me frightened at what America has become.

A tough Anti-Thought that provokes the Mind or the brain of those questioning into stark raving mania.

Yes. Didn't even have to watch it.

What should be obvious becomes a tough thought provoking question on today’s campus.