10

The World According To Herbie

Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 3 months ago to History
76 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

A Little History
The world was changed by a lie put forth by a President. Not so surprising since most of them have been quite adept at the ability to lie convincingly to Americans, throughout history. The Gulf of Tonkin was a lie by LBJ, possibly one of the most lying of all Presidentsand this lie led to the Vietnam way going full scale.But It was all started by the assassinate President, JFKafter he had on very bad advice, Ngo Diem, the Catholic Prime Minister assassinated which was supposed to heal the Buddhist resentment of the Catholic takeove rafter1954.Then, Johnson and McNamara ran the war from the White House instead of the battlefield and didn't seem to care how many civilians were killed and wounded and driven into the arms of the Vietcongand thus the table was set for what became abortion on demand and the 50 to 60 million babies killed so that women could have sex without responsibility and with George Soro's mulri billions funding the growth of the radical left takeover of the Democratic Party.Meanwhile, Republicans not understanding the culture of America, was changing into a hatred of free market capitalism and hatred of the American ideal .

At that time it was still possible for Reagan to rebuild our military because there were still enough Democrats to vote pro-USA but somehow, that got lost through the Clinton years and then Bush made things a bigger mess because he had no understanding of the scope of Muslim terrorism throughout the world and mistook Saddam's secular Sunni dictatorship for the hegemonic growth of Shia Iran tat felt destined to conquer the world for Islam.Then came Obama. His 8 year mission was to terminate the USA as a world power and he succeeded beyond his dreams leaving Trump with a depleted military, and what just passed was a lifting of the squestration by a level of continuing leftist type spending that guaranteed the USA as a 3rd world country. Make America great again? We'll see.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "If it were [in our nature to live without envy and greed], we would have achieved a free state centuries ago."
    We have shown an ability to rise above our nature. We created democratic governments with constitutional limits to keep it from becoming a mob. Educated people who have their act together no longer turn to violence to resolve their differences. The foibles won't go away, but people can and hopefully will create freer ways to organize society. (I'm resisting the word state because future structures may not be similar to the nation state.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    There is no Shangri-La, nor will there ever be.I cannot foresee a time when there's any hope of an independent free country that is so powerful that it can remain free. To date, it is not in the nature of man to live without envy and greed. If it were we would have achieved a free state centuries ago.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    In my view of America, we shouldn't have a significant standing army (or fed income taxes to fund it) beyond what's absolutely necessary. We should have militia composed of citizens with weapons, medical equipment, and repair equipment for the People to protect their country against invasion. There would have to be a minimal standing military for things like missile defense.

    Part of this is to save money and limit gov't power, but part of it is to underscore that the people grant rights to the gov't, not the other way around. The citizens are responsible for maintaining a republic, not government authorities maintaining an empire.

    In this fantasy scenario of mine, US would not be a world power and would not have bases from which to deploy troops, missiles, airstrikes, etc when one country takes over another or gives criminals safe harbor. Americans would hate to hear about tyrants abusing their people Venezuela or Syria but would not be able to do anything more than to serve as a model of what life looks like with pluralism, individualism, very few laws strictly enforced, guaranteed rights, impartial courts, and low taxes.

    Regarding enemy nations, I think we're moving slowly toward a world without nation states as we've known them. My desire is to have free places I described above in that future post-national world. My hope is that people are slowly abandoning ancient brother's-keeper values that maybe applied to small agricultural community but don't make sense in an advanced free economy.

    Sorry for the block of text to explain why I want USA terminated as a world power.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LibertyBelle 7 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Very much like the near-interminable Terms of Service on computer websites; I do not see that they need to be longer than The Encyclopedia
    Britannica
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LibertyBelle 7 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You lived under Communism for 18 years?! (To Maritimus) How horrible. Where did you come from and how did you get out?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LibertyBelle 7 years, 2 months ago
    Well, things are getting worse and worse. But if we can convert enough Americans to Objectivism by
    rational persuasion, and showing them the truth by getting them to read Atlas Shrugged and other books by Ayn Rand, we may have a chance. But it will take a long time. (Though we'd
    better hurry up; if we don't, we might not have much time left).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 2 months ago
    I would love to see the USA terminated as a world power, but I don't think we will in then next 30 years.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    : Thou shalt not blah, blah, bl blah , blah blah kill blah blah, instead of: Don't Kill.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Dr. Z., you are preaching to the choir. I have for many years been posting similar text. Damned if you do or don't, because the web of laws will get you either way. A simple prohibition becomes an entanglement of 20 pages rather than a single paragraph.Any law that takes more than ten pages to be written is no longer a law but a government control piece.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Don't give up. Even if you remain a stalwart post against the power of destruction you're doing the right thing. There are 7 billion out there half of whom have never seen a book let alone read one.Remember the illumination you felt when first reading A,R.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You're the one turning it into diatribe on abortion. You might note that in my post there was only a passing reference to the topic. I not only read well but write well also.most people, present poster excepted have no trouble with comprehending me and vice-versa.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    In 1776 people in North America had no choice. Wealth and well being was there for the taking so long as you were willing to work for it. It was unique in that way. There were no lords and ladies, land owners or centuries of inheritance. It was work and become wealthy or starve, nothinh much in between.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by chad 7 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree with your definition. What I was trying to point out is that America is sliding into communism by voting it into existennce and at one point it will be as you pointed out a communist dictatorship pretending to be a democracy as China and Russia liked having the word Republic in the name of their countries although they were nothing of the kind. Many dictatorships pretend to be for the people allowing them freedom of speech, ownership of property, right to public trial under their 'constitutions' while of course none of those rights really exist. The example I use is not turning a ship around but Gulliver, imagine being tied down by millions of ropes none of which individually could hold him down and a few being undone while others are still being applied. I guess after fighting this trend for so long and not seeing any positive results I tend to believe that nothing will be done at this point to actually 'change course' as it were. Thanks for your thoughtful reply.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mgarbizo1 7 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I'm a little bit younger than you, so I wanted to discuss this with someone up to the challenge, wink wink. You said that carrying a pregnancy to term gives a person a lot more options, but I agree with this, or atleast I don't understand what you mean. As I see it, there are only two options a prospective mother that finds out they are pregnant has: let the pregnancy continue or terminate. Its a decision that the mother (only in the case of an unwanted pregnancy, mind you) is faced with every day until the pregnancy reaches full term. Like you, I know I am too shallow to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term when I know that I don't want to have a child at that point in my life, and there is a means to terminate that is safe for me to do so. What do you mean by a prospective mother having more options by carrying a pregnancy to term? I have considered myself in how this would go if I hypothetically was pregnant and carried to term, what would be my options. I could only come up with keeping the baby or giving it up for adoption, and based on my background, I'd probably force myself to keep said baby and therefore sacrifice what would be my life if I had only decided to terminate when I knew that was what I wanted. In each case, it is still a choice that the potential mother has and must make each and every day, and therefore, they must live with the consequences of that decision. The responsibility is there whether you chose to continue the pregnancy, or terminate. To me, it just takes it's toll on a person in different forms depending on the decision and the psyche of the person. And shaming women who choose abortion still occurs today.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ prof611 7 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I am ending this thread. Obviously, you do not know how to read. Your answer has nothing to do with my comment!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Maritimus 7 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hello chad,
    Unfortunately, I have to object to your term "democratic communism". In my considered opinion it is a clear contradiction of terms.
    Early proponents of communism, Marx and Lenin, openly and approvingly called it the "dictatorship of the proletariat". Its name is derived from Paris Commune, an attempt at revolution after the defeat of France in its 1870 war with Prussia. It was bloody and murderous, ending in the "bloody week" and defeat, after it lasted only two months.
    I lived for 18 years in one of the communist "democracies" and could spend your lifetime giving you examples after many examples, showing that it is a brutal dictatorship masquerading as democracy and "freedom for the people".
    It is now about 58 years since the slide into socialist hell started in America. around 1960. Notice that it was the working class voters that understood and begun the change in 2016 election. But it is like turning a humongous aircraft carrier by 180 degrees. It may take another 58 years to point it to the proper direction, toward individual freedom and prosperity that all working people deserve. On the other hand, it may be just a tremulous variation in course with no bright future as its target. As someone else in this discussion said, it will be up to the American people to decide which way the course will evolve.
    As you can tell, communism invokes some emotions in this old guy. I could not refrain from trying to remind everybody within the ear shot of its true nature. I think that it is very important that the people know the truth behind the leftist propaganda. Ask Ayn Rand. She felt it on her own skin!
    Stay well.
    Sincerely,
    Maritimus
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 7 years, 2 months ago
    We do have the government we deserve, sadly enough. I always liked the line from Shakespeare's Henry the VI, "let's kill all the lawyers." We have become the most litigious country on the planet, with more lawyers per capita than doctors, and the lawyers control the government. We have been so trained to fear the law that we are frozen from stopping government overreach, even when it is truly outrageous.

    Why are things so out of control and corrupt? I'll tell you why. Law involves the criminal and the corrupt. Eliminate those, and the lawyer is out of a job. The goal of a government controlled by lawyers is to weave so complex a net of laws that it becomes impossible for a sane person not to be in violation of one of those laws at any time. Become an identified enemy of the government, and you find yourself the target of a legal assault that will find you in jail or bankrupt, and most likely both. As one honest lawyer once told me, "It isn't a question of whether or not you've broken the law, but which law you've broken."

    The Deep State involves both lawyers and self serving bureaucrats. Trump is a danger to them mostly for his demand that more regulations be rolled back than created. That threatens to create holes in their carefully crafted net, resulting in a truly free populace for the first time in quite a long time.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo