Are Alien Civilizations Technologically Advanced ?
The answer may depend on exo-planet politics?
Interesting article, aside from the "climate change" angle...(it's environment, stupid...Not Climate!)
However, the authors bring an interesting point.
Harkin back to ancient civilizations. They obviously had technologies and understandings of the cosmos we do not have today. They built out of stone and didn't broadcast their presents to the cosmos either but they seemed to get by quite well inspite of it all.
Let's look at this from a different perspective. Perhaps, as the books of Enoch pose, we had help from creatures that weren't quite on the up and up...evil you might say. They self destroyed their handy work, poisoned our genes and forever left us with that reminisce in the ruling structures and self assertive creatures of our world.
So, perhaps it would be a smart thing not to announce your presents to the cosmos, leaving the smallest footprint of life as possible so as to not attract the wrong kind of attention.
Of course, all this is conjecture and hypothetical but is something to consider.
Perhaps they are, in fact, watching and shaking their heads in amazement at us stupid humans.
Interesting article, aside from the "climate change" angle...(it's environment, stupid...Not Climate!)
However, the authors bring an interesting point.
Harkin back to ancient civilizations. They obviously had technologies and understandings of the cosmos we do not have today. They built out of stone and didn't broadcast their presents to the cosmos either but they seemed to get by quite well inspite of it all.
Let's look at this from a different perspective. Perhaps, as the books of Enoch pose, we had help from creatures that weren't quite on the up and up...evil you might say. They self destroyed their handy work, poisoned our genes and forever left us with that reminisce in the ruling structures and self assertive creatures of our world.
So, perhaps it would be a smart thing not to announce your presents to the cosmos, leaving the smallest footprint of life as possible so as to not attract the wrong kind of attention.
Of course, all this is conjecture and hypothetical but is something to consider.
Perhaps they are, in fact, watching and shaking their heads in amazement at us stupid humans.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
When I viewed the video, I didn't see that uniformity but I do speculate that the entire system might be cyclical in nature and we are only seeing half of it. Those galaxy's and universes moving away might be heading to the other side of the great attractor...more at 11:00...laughing.
Seems, from our perspective, the milkyway is in the middle of it all...makes one what to go...hmm.
Interesting thought on different time scales. Perhaps the vastness of the cosmos, the distances involved, prohibits our sharing the same time scales of other civilizations.
The mere exercise of thinking about these relationships is what brought about self awareness, self introspection and contemplation of our place within everything we see, experience, explore and wonder about.
Without meaning, we would not create, we would not have the drive to live and to better ourselves and would be forever stuck in an instinctive, reactionary animal like existence.
That's my outlook and the outlook of western civilization anyway.
It also seems that connection is fragile and can be lost, blocked or weakened via a host of purposed and natural circumstances.
Exercising that connection is key and thinking about such things as alien civilizations helps in that regard because we have to introspect our own existence. Viewing self is a key component to connecting to our minds...something the brain alone cannot do.
There have been those who say that there are no advanced civilizations because with even simple calculations, they would expand their territory rapidly. In theory, these scientists say, we would already be in contact with these civilizations, if they existed. I contend that comes from an anthropomorphic view, assuming the aliens are like us. Whether from biological, cultural, or philosophic differences, there may be very good reasons why an alien civilization does not expend its reach quickly.
As Earth's human population becomes more affluent, barring a catastrophe, we will reproduce less, and our population will reach a stable point. Will that impede the Star Trek vision of ever-expanding human reach into the cosmos? As we are now finding technologies that promise longer lifespans, and artificial forms of birth, how will that affect our civilization? Trying to make predictions about alien civilizations is ridiculous when we can't even be sure where our civilization is headed.
I don't think for a second that another civilization would even consider (necessarily) Objectivist values as even a value. From the very beginning, literally, their history would be completely different, and so the growth of their civilization, if they have one...would also be completely different.
I am not sure we would even recognize a different civilization, or the beings that belong to it, as existing, much less be able to "understand" it, even to the smallest extent.
But that mental exercise is what keeps us from getting old. At least, I hope it does, even though I know the inevitable will happen.
We (beings, conscious or otherwise) make up meanings to justify our existence and give - yes - meaning to it.
Intrinsically there is no meaning, only "stuff." All that "stuff" has no meaning, except what we create.
We are our own nightmare.
If they are emotional, I suspect they would have very much the same problems as we do and aren't any more advanced than we are given a similar timeline length.
Load more comments...