It's about to get cold in the U.S and Global warming is blamed.
The scientist claims 300 years of data on the jet stream . I find that hard to believe.
The shift in the Jet stream is likely do to atmospheric compression as a result of a weakened Magnetisphere.
Even cold anomalies such as icicles in Houston, Tx. And snow blanketing the Sahara desert.
These are " useful" in frightening people about global warming. So today the new narrative is if the weather is hot global warming if the weather is cold ......bingo global warming.
The shift in the Jet stream is likely do to atmospheric compression as a result of a weakened Magnetisphere.
Even cold anomalies such as icicles in Houston, Tx. And snow blanketing the Sahara desert.
These are " useful" in frightening people about global warming. So today the new narrative is if the weather is hot global warming if the weather is cold ......bingo global warming.
Or for that matter, how could anyone disentangle all the elements (temperature, precipitation, solar, shade, nutrients, etc.) and tell us it’s a proxy for the jet-stream position? The answer is: they can’t.
Today me dino sought to check out that super hot post-Mesozoic period and discovered this biased Popular Science tripe.
https://www.popsci.com/carbon-emissio...
Me dino used to subscribe to Popular Science until they had an article about Obama's predictions about the future.
It included two or three full page photos of a smiling King Barry in his supposed grandeur that really turned my stomach.
Very shortly thereafter me dino was asked to re-subscribe. No!
Overall, the magazine were turning lib crappy anyway.
I added that the nuking may have saved up to a million American lives in an effort to make Japan surrender.
Some top Smithsonian official wrote back about how he was "good friends" with these guys "down the hall" who wrote the article. Like me dino could freaking care!
I no longer saw that libtard magazine in the mail. That's all I cared about. .
I am interested in
GE·og·ra·phy
jēˈäɡrəfē/Submit
noun
the study of the physical features of the earth and its atmosphere, and of human activity as it affects and is affected by these, including the distribution of populations and resources, land use, and industries.
the nature and relative arrangement of places and physical features.
plural noun: geographies
"knowing the geography and topology of the battlefield"
This from the horses mouth so to speak.http://http://thefederalist.com/2017/01/03/n...
More and more magazines are publishing meaningless garbage. I have to subscriptions up for renewal, and I'm not going to bother. I don't need to spend money on magazines with leftist propaganda. I can always tune into CNN for that. :)
He was completely ignoring all the new hot stuff about the corruption of the DOJ and the FBI as well as The Evil Hag paying for that dossier full of lies.
Talk about the two obstruction charges that are no smoking gun.
The ridicules paper /article was penned for Nature Communications owned by the same German family (Hotzbrinck)hat also owns Scientific American both families are among the richest in the world. Davos types of the James Taggert ilk.
"Hotz-brink." Say it aloud. Sounds like a good name for a villain who gets his.
Stefan von Holtzbrinck and his half-siblings, Monika Schoeller and Dieter von Holtzbrinck, inherited publishing house Verlagsgruppe Holtzbrinck from their father Georg, who founded it as a book club in 1948.
Look over the other tales on the Bloomberg "news" site and get a fuller understanding of biased, fake "news."
" . .central Tokyo fell to a low of minus 4 degrees Celsius, the capital’s lowest figure in 48 years."
Fears of water pipes cracking from freezing.
" electricity usage was predicted to reach a level of 96 percent at the peak time slot,
50.5 million kilowatts versus the peak load capacity of 52.27 million."
We are in one and the next five years will be troublesome at best.see John Caseys work in "Upheaval" John Casey, a former senior field engineer for NASA and the current CEO of the International Earthquake and Volcano Prediction Center.Jan 26, 2017
Or Adapt 2030 David Dubyne https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-5d...
It has taken years but the cat is now out of the bag on the Chemtrails. Most folks don't know or notice the checkerboard to milky haze of Chemtrails that remain long after the jet is gone.
I notice them in car commercials tv shows that are shot out side. These people should be executed.
The bigger culprit I believe is the weakened Magnetisphere this allows the atmosphere to be compressed at the poles and the intertropical convergence zone by the solar wind that hits it at about 900 kilometers a second when coronal dark holes face the Earth .it takes about 36 hrs or so to arrive. The low pressure convergences can create a virtual River in the sky as we have seen many many examples of in the last year. One is expected mid week in New Zealand see this
https://youtu.be/ZHLABGV67KE
The most frightening thing I have seen in the Midwest was a sky full of HAARP clouds. Row after row of perfectly spaced and sized clouds, like cylinders, row after row, filling the sky above WalMart. That afternoon we had a terrible storm that took down many mature trees,
For the first time in quite a while since mid December no zigzagging back and forth high altitude jets leaving trails on our clear days. See my recent post on new Geoengineering plans.
They realize, it just doesn't fit the narrative. But that is a good point. Keep in mind the pole is shifting rapidly.
What do you think about tree rings showing jet stream patterns? See my comment below.
Regards ,
DOB
If Truett pre-selected trees that looked like, which she seems to be doing in the photo, she’s no better than the flawed science of the Yamal fiasco where a single tree biased the entire temperature record.
Further, it seems she didn’t pay attention to recent literature, such as Briffa and Melvin, 2011 and Brienen et al., 2012a,b
Basically, older trees grow slower, and that mimics the temperature signal paleo researchers like Mann look for. Unless you correct for this issue, you end up with a false temperature signal, like a hockey stick in modern times. Separating a valid temperature signal from the natural growth pattern of the tree becomes a larger challenge with this correction.…
Dendrochronologists observed that the older a tree was, the slower it tended to grow, even after controlling for age- and time-driven effects. The result is an artificial downward signal in the regional curve (as the older ages are only represented by the slower growing trees) and a similar artificial positive signal in the final chronology (as earlier years are only represented by the slow growing trees), an effect termed modern sample bias. When this biased chronology is used in climate reconstruction it then implies a relatively unsuitable historic climate. Obviously, the detection of long term 15 trends in tree growth, as might be caused by a changing climate or carbon fertilization, is also seriously compromised (Brienen et al., 2012b). More generally, modern sample bias can be viewed as a form of “differing-contemporaneous-growth-rate bias”, where changes in the magnitude of growth of the tree ring series included in the chronology over time (or age, in the case of the regional curve) skew the final curve, especially 20 near the ends of the chronology where series are rapidly added and removed (Briffa and Melvin, 2011).
The recent deep freeze many days below zero starting just before Xmas the wind came straight down from Canada into Minnesota Brrrrr
Then the warm wind comes from the south both Meridional patterns.
I recommend David DuByne and Adapt 2030
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-5d...
Many videos archived search and you will fin a great wealth of what is going on with our weather.
Also Ben Davidson's Suspicious Observers daily space weather links attached.https://www.youtube.com/user/Suspicious0bserv...
Click videos and have fun it is an awesome resource.
Regards,
DOB
https://youtu.be/weth9ypgpWw
This is the first, a start of a six part interview
https://vimeo.com/229090969
Our technology definitely would be in danger, however. Even now, solar storms can damage satellites, cause power outages and interrupt radio communications. These kinds of negative influences clearly will increase if the magnetic field and thus its shielding function became significantly weaker, e.g. during a reversal, and it will be important to find mitigation strategies,
One additional worry is that a weakening and eventual reversal in the field would disorient all those species that rely on geomagnetism for navigation, including bees, salmon, turtles, whales, bacteria and pigeons. There is no scientific consensus on how those creatures would cope.
Continental shifts?
Many of the disaster scenarios associated with geomagnetic pole reversals in popular imagination are pure fantasy, the scientists said. There definitely won't be any break-up or shift of the continents.
This might interest you. This link is regarding cosmic rays and the formation of clouds.
The Earths Magnetisphere has been rapidly weakening, it is the shield blocking those rays.
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/n...
The most obvious way for warming to be caused naturally is for small, natural fluctuations in the circulation patterns of the atmosphere and ocean to result in a 1% or 2% decrease in global cloud cover. Clouds are the Earth’s sunshade, and if cloud cover changes for any reason, you have global warming — or global cooling.”
1. At STP, a fire of 500 F will never heat water past 212 F. Therefore, scientisits lie about thermodynamics.
2. Pluto was a planet. Then it was not. Now, it might be, again...
(Johns Hopkins U doctoral candidate's conference poster presentation here:
https://hub.jhu.edu/2017/03/16/make-p.... )
(Even NASA does not know.
https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstud... )
3. I have a relative who is a Born Again Christian. He is raising his children that way, of course. I saw a book in his home arguing against science. It showed a skieleton of a large herbivore dinosaur, like a brontosaurus, and then a recreation of that beast. It then showed a skeleton of a dog and next to it a Dr. Seuss-like cartoon of a dog, with purple tufts, etc. Scientists claim all kinds of things they cannot prove, said the book.
My point here is that taking one aspect of a complicated problem and its proposed solution(s), and arguing out of context, does not disprove the inititial assumptions. The easy assumptions - impossible to ignore are that (1) local weather changes (2) climate changes and (3) no less than the trees, human activity is affected by and in turn affects both local weather and global climate.
One of my liberal comrades who has 40 IQ points on me said that when he finally gets a conservative to agree to the facts about global warming, the response is to get more guns and go higher into the mountains. That is not quite my own response, but it is in the ballpark. My liberal comrade is sad because we lack "the political will" to do something about global warming. The other side of that coin is that he readily agrees that increased carbon dioxide will make the plants happy and we will have more food from some regions and that is good. So, for myself, I am not too concerned about the "lack of political will."
Nonetheless, it moves.
("Eppur si muove" -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/And_yet...
Point 3) for example, is a statement so vague that it can only have significance as rhetoric leading to a plea to do something about it. But there is no 'it'.
High, or low, IQ has no correlation to honesty, high IQ may confer the ability to concoct better lies.
'What do you get when you add energy to a chaotic system?'
The implication is you get more extremes, but more data points from the same population lead to more records being broken, more extremes. Thus, point not confirmed.
Has, governments, bad regulations, bad bureaucracies, cronies, ignorant industrialist,(and I don't mean that in a negative way, there are lots of things we didn't and still don't know about the consequences of what we do on our local environment), and the effects of large city's, ruined our environment?...absolutely.
Has that changed the weather?...absolutely NOT!
Do the cities, black top highways, cement all over the place create temperature variations locally...Yes...does that change the weather?...NO it does not.
The other nonsense about how clouds and storms form by "evaporation" is just that...nonsense. Any humidity, temperature variations or localized evaporation does not cause rain storms. They create fog or that thick haze we see in the summers and that only is in the lowest parts of the troposphere.
Clouds, rain and storms are created at the tropospheric/stratospheric boundary layer and the main driver is cosmic radiation and solar radiation interactions with our ionosphere which creates hydrogen and oxygen which accumulates on natural aerosols in our stratosphere together with upper and lower atmosphere wind patterns. (as best as I understand it)
So, is it warming globally?..no. Has mankind caused some localized weather patterns (tornadoes) (strip mining of mountains) or (cities) to change...yes.
Has any of these things caused a major shift in climate patterns, mean temperature and cycles over time...NO.
The cycles come and go, just like they always have and we have yet to know nor account for all of them.
Further, it seems she didn’t pay attention to recent literature, such as Briffa and Melvin, 2011 and Brienen et al., 2012a,b
Basically, older trees grow slower, and that mimics the temperature signal paleo researchers like Mann look for. Unless you correct for this issue, you end up with a false temperature signal, like a hockey stick in modern times. Separating a valid temperature signal from the natural growth pattern of the tree becomes a larger challenge with this correction.…
Dendrochronologists observed that the older a tree was, the slower it tended to grow, even after controlling for age- and time-driven effects. The result is an artificial downward signal in the regional curve (as the older ages are only represented by the slower growing trees) and a similar artificial positive signal in the final chronology (as earlier years are only represented by the slow growing trees), an effect termed modern sample bias. When this biased chronology is used in climate reconstruction it then implies a relatively unsuitable historic climate. Obviously, the detection of long term 15 trends in tree growth, as might be caused by a changing climate or carbon fertilization, is also seriously compromised (Brienen et al., 2012b). More generally, modern sample bias can be viewed as a form of “differing-contemporaneous-growth-rate bias”, where changes in the magnitude of growth of the tree ring series included in the chronology over time (or age, in the case of the regional curve) skew the final curve, especially 20 near the ends of the chronology where series are rapidly added and removed (Briffa and Melvin, 2011).
Low temperatures are the following step un this cycle, since the Glaciars liquidification generates a change in ocean currents AND sea level rises. Deny this all you like, but Carbon Dioxide AND Monoxide have densed the ozone producing a more severe Greenhouse Effect. Thus, the geothermal balance is shifted AND the biosphere, altered.
The world's first purpose built gas station was constructed in St. Louis, Missouri in 1905 at 420 S. Theresa Avenue. The second gas station was constructed in 1907 by Standard Oil of California (now Chevron) in Seattle, Washington at what is now Pier 32.
Scientists that falsify data do make things up.
Tell me how tree rings have a history of wind direction and how to determine its effect on the trees.
https://principia-scientific.org/brea...