Hi Suzanne,
This post tells the story.https://uk.news.yahoo.com/swiss-town-denies-p...

One should only attempt it well armed.

Politics and nutrition seem to go together. Crap in, crap out.

You can't actually deport liberals. You'll have to hire Michael Moore to convince them that they'll be better off moving to Cuba. Whereupon in a year or two, they'll be begging to come back in. If by some chance the do get in, they'll keep the old pie-hole shut about ever leaving again.

Especially when one considers their full-throated support for illegal immigration - which is dominated by Mexico!

Did you ever notice how they all seem to want to run to Canada? Not Mexico. What nation is the closest in most aspects to the USA? Of course, you guessed it, Canada. Why not to some of the people's paradises such as Venezuela, or China?

It looks as if the Constitution is meaningless because it is constantly being subverted by the very institution that is devised to be one of its pillars.

You can't divorce a political party. Would be cool if you could.

They'll find a way to use other people's money. They've been doing it through taxation. Another reason to keep them out of power.

Democrats don't seem to understand that adding more poverty stricken, uneducated immigrants to their voter rolls isn't a good strategy. The DNC is floundering, unable to raise needed cash for campaigns, because they have few donors with significant wealth. As Tom Perez, DNC Chair, says, they have golden ideas for 2018, but a tin budget.

We could claim Irreconcilable differences against the leftest in congress too!

It's not Federal Law that makes Federal decisions on immigration policy supreme, but the Constitution itself in Article I, Section 8 where Congress is specifically and explicitly delegated the power to control immigration. The problem has been that the enforcement of immigration provisions has been inconsistently (to understate the matter) applied and in some cases ignored entirely (DACA). Congress should have removed Obama over DACA alone - not to mention everything else.

If only all those who rant about how they will leave the country if X wins such and such an election actually did, we'd be so much better off!

Irreconcilable differences? That would dictate deportation of about 100 million due to cultural differences alone.

Wow, that's a wonderful immigration policy. Just think of how many Liberals we could deport.

What a precedent! How about that as a reason for divorce? Or getting rid of the neighbor next door? I could go on forever.

I like the Swiss approach where they recently denied an immigrant citizenship because she is "annoying "

Immigration, border control, is a federal matter since its authority to do these things is derived from the ratified Constitution whose signatories are the 50 states. Constitutionally the federal government being derelict in their duty in both immigration and border control gave up their sole authority to the states. Border states, those adjacent to a non-US state) have an obligation to define and protect their borders for the safety and prosperity of its residents. If the states fail, then each citizen has a RIGHT to protect his home, his city, his state from foreign invasion.

In the United States authority derives from the people to the state and from the state to the federal government; this is how it was intended to work. If the agents of the people refuse to do the peoples business then the people need take care of ti themselves and damn the agreements made with state and federal institutions.

The country needs a colonic and the politicians are the piles that need to be flushed out of the system.

Problem is, this time, it's not north and south, it's not contained and it's not just in governments, educational institutions or the bureaucracies.
It's speckled all over the place, in places you'd least expect...negotiating in the culture today, is a treacherous trek.