Too many coincidences? Or am I being paranoid?

Posted by Non_mooching_artist 12 years, 6 months ago to Government
38 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Today I was mulling over something I heard, and the more I thought about it, the more frightening it seems.
First,Executive order is put into the same sentence as gun control. Second, I hear this report about the president of Egypt coming to the US to meet w/Obama, and having asked that the '93 World Trade Center bomber, Blind Sheik, be released or have more lenient visitation rights. That was insane enough of a request to have been immediately smacked down with a "Hell, no!". Instead, there is silence from the WH.
Third, the sale by Aljazeera Gore of a broadcast media co, to Aljazeera. Separately, not too much, together... What think you in The Gulch?

All Comments

Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by khalling 12 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I cannot believe I just gave you a point for that. must be all the shellshock from the headlines today
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 12 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    sorry. Robspierre solution is what you are putting out there. The American Revolution was not the failure that the French Revolution was. Why?
    remedies on the books for Treason aside.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 12 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    lol.... no, I was making a point, regardless of attire or authority. But, a man in a flying nun hat would probably make me laugh ...for split second ...right before I pulled the trigger.... (I might die laughing....) ba ha ha ha ha I'm so corny.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by khalling 12 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    that whole Robspierre thing was CRAZY bad. we talked about this. violent overthrows often lead to violent men leading. The Revolution did not have as a goal to unseat the King of England. We define our sovereignty and protect it, Constitution firmly in place. do not call me an idiot
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 12 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    No lol. But...on that note... maybe YOU will be disarmed systematically, but I won't be. I will probably be one of the first "to disappear"...if anyone ...ANYone comes thru my door to take my guns (or anything else) I will be shooting. I don't care if it's someone with a badge, a swastika, a nun habit, or the homeless guy you lives under the overpass.. an intruder is an intruder I will shoot them to defend what is mine. And I'm fully aware that I would not survive, nor would I want to. If it comes to that then life won't be worth living anyway. But, no..that was not my theory.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by Non_mooching_artist 12 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think we are going to be disarmed, systematically, so we can offer no resistance. They will have the master list of those of us who would appear to offer up the most resistance from gun registration, and your neighbors start disappearing.
    Is your theory anything like this?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 12 years, 6 months ago
    Al qaeda is being invited into the mix as well. That's my take. I have a whole theory that I won't bore another person with...
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo