A letter from Samuel Adams which applies to today
Found this while going through some other items. What is interesting is that this document was written prior to the Continental Congress and the Declaration of Independence, but its arguments come directly from Locke and exhibit a moral claim to the rights of Englishmen under the English Constitution.
Therefore, his Majesty's American subjects, who acknowledge themselves bound by the ties of allegiance, have an equitable claim to the full enjoyment of the fundamental rules of the British constitution; that it is an essential, unalterable right in nature, engrafted into the British constitution, as a fundamental law, and ever held sacred and irrevocable by the subjects within the realm, that what a man has honestly acquired is absolutely his own, which he may freely give, but cannot be taken from him without his consent; that the American subjects may, therefore, exclusive of any consideration of charter rights, with a decent firmness, adapted to the character of free men and subjects, assert this natural and constitutional right.
Even as late as the Declaration the general conception was of a revolt based on commonly accept ideas against a particular government violating the rights they believed they had already had and had been living under. The ideas for the form of the limited constitutional government protecting those rights came later.
Carl Becker, in his 1922 The Declaration of Independence: A Study in the History of Political Ideas, wrote:
"[t]he strength of the Declaration was precisely that it said what everyone was thinking. Nothing could have been more futile than an attempt to justify a revolution on principles which no one had ever heard of before." (p24)
and
"So far as the 'Fathers' were, before 1776, directly influenced by particular writers, the writers were English, notably Locke. Most Americans had absorbed Locke's works as a kind of political gospel; and the Declaration, in its form, its phraseology, follows closely certain sentences in Locke's second treatise on government." (p.26)
and
"It was Locke's conclusion that seemed to the colonists sheer common sense, needing no argument at all. Locke did not need to convince the colonists because they were already convinced; and they were already convinced because they had long been living under governments which did, in a rough and ready way, conform to the kind of government for which Locke furnished a reasoned foundation." (p.72)
Becker quotes from a 1764 pamphlet, The Rights of the Colonies Examined, on the commonly accepted principle that colonies have "as much freedom as the mother state", by Stephen Hopkins (who later signed the Declaration) and Thomas Hutchinson (who later became a self-exiled loyalist). (p.82)
There is much more on the pre-revolutionary period in Bernard Bailyn's 1967 The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution.
That common understanding and emphasis on natural rights is what is missing today.
His words: "therefore, exclusive of any consideration of charter rights, with a decent firmness, adapted to the character of free men and subjects, assert this natural and constitutional right.".
In this sentence is the age of reason and the confidence of being responsible for one's self and sovereignty: these are the heritage of JOhn Locke but the character is pure Sam Adams. The statue of Sam in front of Faneuil Hall in Boston says simply, "He Caused the Revolution" Locke's principles with the confident force of Adam's wisdom and character gave us freedom and we will never know his like again until reason once more becomes an age.
I learned in a high school history class that the "American Revolution" took place in the minds of the people between 1753 and 1767. The War for Independence was a consequence of that.
Do you know the PINE TREE SHILLINGS? Massachusetts used a fake date when the throne was empty to continue striking their own coins, normally a royal perogative. http://amhistory.si.edu/coins/printab...
Also, Massachusetts invaded and captured MAINE, a French colony.They always thought of themselves as an independent nation... or at least some people did...
Such was the stuff of The American Spirit way back when before it began to be choked off.
Modern Massachusetts, what did you do to yourself?
Thanks very much for sharing and feel free to start your own thread on the Shillings. That was pretty cool. Massachusetts has a lot of colonial history worth reviewing in my book.
(Kidding... Kidding)