14

Calling Elizabeth Warren Pocahontas Is A Racial Slur

Posted by $ allosaur 7 years, 5 months ago to Politics
117 comments | Share | Flag

Pocahontas is a racial slur! Pocahontas is a racial slur!
Pocahontas is a racial slur! Pocahontas is a racial slur!
The race card pulling left hopes that if you hear that nonsense enough times, you will begin to believe it.
Remember how the race card was repeatedly pulled during the eight-year regime of socialist Obamanation to make critics shut up and sit down.
So-called journalists hope to make Trump do the same. Fat chance.
Me dino will be away from the PC for a little while.
I'm the wheels for a brother who needs an operation. Bro should be OK.
Oh, look for "Liawantha" about 15 comments down in comments section of the article.
Now me dino has something to add when I write about Pocahontas Liawatha Woo-Woo-Woo-Warren.
Suppose if I put the word "squaw" in front of all that, libs would call that both sexist and racist.
Guess only lib movie stars can say "squaw" in Westerns.


All Comments

  • Posted by $ 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thank you very much!
    At last me dino has a solid alternative to Pocahontas, which some Gulchers have a problem with Trump and I using to poke fun at the dishonesty of Woo-woo-woo-Warren.
    Minnehaha is a fictional character in the Hiawatha poem, not a real upstanding if long deceased historical Native American.
    Me dino really likes that "haha" part too. Haha at you, Woo-Woo!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "I mentioned NO race. "
    I don't believe latitude has that effect, so it sounds like "latitudism" to me.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Rationality and intelligence are always important for human life. Life is not automatic, it requires thinking to make the right choices. A primitive form of survival is in many ways more difficult in harsher climates, but those who never progresses beyond eating pineapples that fall off a tree are arrested at that level and still cannot contend with disease and attacks by animals, rival tribes, or rival anything else, let alone develop an advanced standard of living and a technological economy under which the rights of the individual are protected.

    Civilization advanced by freeing man from submission to the tribe, not intelligently "working together". The social system of capitalism protecting the rights of the individual and based on voluntary trade made it possible to "work together" for mutual benefit and profit. Individuals have a right to come here as long as they come to work for their own lives and respect the rights of others. They are human beings with the same rights regardless of where they come from. The conservative notion of requiring an immigrant or any other individual to serve the "greater good" is anti-American collectivism They don't have a right to come as criminals, or spread disease, or live off the welfare state in whole or part, or impose socialism through what amounts to a back door foreign invasion, but there is no moral requirement to come for our benefit or to stay in some foreign swamp for the benefit of its tribe no matter what their intelligence is.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Low intelligence is not the cause, let alone the only cause, of violence. How people act depends on the content of the ideas, whether simple or advanced. The German Weimar Republic that created Nazism was one of the best educated countries in the world. Conversely, there are a lot of honest, hard working people who are not well-educated or intellectually sophisticated. You should read Leonard Peikoff's The Ominous Parallels for the role of philosophical ideas in the formation of Nazism and the parallels with the evolution of statism in this country.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CaptainKirk 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    LOL. Review IQ requirements to live in different places. Invention is the mother of necessity. I mentioned NO race.

    Did you watch that video? He literally EXPLAINS it.

    There is also a great video on how COOKING food leads to developing a larger brain (more neurons): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7_XH...

    So, imagine living in an area where enough food is ready to eat (no canning needed), and the people don't have to plan ahead for seasons without food. There actually may be something where they are skinny and have a lower IQ because they are not consuming enough calories to develop both the body and the brain, and natural selection kicks in. Strength helps more than planning ahead.

    Don't take my word for it. And I am NOT suggesting it is about race, but about ENVIRONMENT. Parents who put their young children on low cholesterol/low fat diets (accidentally because the parents stopped eating as much of it), caused an IQ drop of up to 15 pts in their kids. That's ENVIRONMENT, and it makes sense.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Northern Europe urbanized and industrialized first for a variety of reasons. I have heard the idea the high latitudes led to industry, but I don't think the evidence supports that.

    I think you're taking it even a step further and saying people from more equatorial regions are inferior. This is just naked racism.

    Contrary to what you're saying about USA siphoning the producers off and causing conditions to deteriorate in other places, it's not happening. Most of the world is improving.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "do not confuse the dinosaur."
    ha ha. I only saw them in the gym with no sound. They ran lurid stories that I tried to look away from.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CaptainKirk 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Watch some Stefan...
    Where food falls from trees, and you dont have to wear clothes... IQ is not important.

    In the nothern regions, the higher IQ people planned better, did better, and selective breeding made them Higher IQ and ultimately richer.

    If you take an area like norway. REMOVE EVERYTHING. You could put all the sudanese you want there. And tell me. How long before it will be a rich country?

    Rich nations earned their wealth over time, by investing, and recognizing the intelligence of working together.

    Coming to america in 1500s was no picnic. Not even in the 1700s. It was only through LOTS of sacrifice, delayed gratification, and desire to improve things for the next generation. Things low IQ people don't want to do!

    But if you look at your children as something you can sell, or abuse, especially your young girls. You aint building what we built.

    We should NOT LET ANYONE in our country permanently who does not add to the greater good. And EVERY country should have this rule.

    Instead, the USA steals the brightest from all over, and their origin countries will NEVER get fixed.

    Watch this:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzf...

    And ask if your open borders is the way to fix this?
    Or if we move to Nuclear Energy, and help provide them with energy, clean water, and the ability to build their own infrastructure where they are!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The only part I followed was about IQ predicting criminal behavior. (I really apologize for not following the rest.)

    I don't see any test as sacred, but I can see ability on the test could be correlated with many things such as crime. I think you're saying if IQ is correlated with honest behavior, then we could have a IQ test at the gate, as it were, reducing the number of criminals entering. I do not think this is practical. Also, if IQ and honest behavior are not very tightly correlated, the test would let in a lot of bad people and deny entry to a lot of good people. Whether we like it or not, I think the world will homogenize geographically. France won't be a rich country and Ethiopia won't be a poor country. Instead of you have rich and poor people everywhere. IMHO you cannot stop it, and I do not even think it's desirable. Maybe it will lead to people living in little gated enclaves, and I'll wish we could go back. I'm not sure how it will play out. It's very difficult for me to see nations staying separate now that we have jet travel and the Internet.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CaptainKirk 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Do you believe in property rights?

    So, as a citizen, we DIFFER on this. See, I am second generation American, and my wife is from former Yugoslavia (Macedonia). I've been to Russia a few times to hire programmers. I can tell you how it ends. Not well. My wife speaks 5 languages and has visited every major continent. I've been everywhere from Norway, through most of europe, all Americas, and Australia. (China is on my list, Africa/Egypt were scrubbed). You could say I have traveled a bit. I think I am about 8 states shy of having stayed in every state( HI and PR were hit).

    Social Mores determine a culture. IQ and Empathy determine the depth/quality of a culture.

    As IQ goes down, violence tends to go up. Brutality and Might make Right are the rule of law. Also, cheating goes up, and so does corruption.

    In Russia I learned there is ZERO correlation between poverty and crime! In fact, in Russia, it is inverted. The wealthier you are, the more likely you are a criminal! The poor don't commit the same level of violent crimes and robberies (nobody has anything to take). Also, their form of punishment is almost barbaric. But it keeps people honest.

    So, Macedonia is being overrun by Albanians. Now Albanians have already ruined and corrupted their government. Now everything in Macedonia is printed in 2 languages. Albanians are not bad people, but the bad ones among them have learned the system. Back home, the punishment was swift. Here... They argue the difference in the wording between Albanian and Macedonian confused them. They are given another warning, and let free. It is BY FAR less safe there now than 20 years ago. Drugs are rampant, sex slave trade is active. It's like a different world. And now, the incoming government is used as a tool to persecute the outgoing. We have an asylum seeking friend who was in the government, and their family is continuously harrassed, etc.

    Polite society gets pushed aside. They are simply outnumbered by the masses. Society degrades to the lower level. Simply revision to the mean.

    Why would I want people here who have an IQ of 70, that will feel left out by society, and easily converted into some form of criminal, because with that IQ, they will NEVER excel in America. But, they can survive as a criminal for a while. Also, they will vote for handouts, of course...

    I encourage you to watch some Stefan Molynuex.
    I want to visit EVERY culture. And see it. I don't want them all blended.

    I don't travel as much any more. It really has gotten to be less safe. France and Rome were beautiful when I went. I see the videos now... How could you want that here?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "The govt is driven by special interests."
    I actually think the nation state is going away, and having boundaries where people cannot cross, artificially propping up prices by keeping willing buyers and sellers apart is bad. I want them to move toward mostly open immigration. So much value is in computer data now, that flies across borders without a tax anyway. I see borders as a vestige of a period of time when roads could connect former city-states well but were not good at taking people long distances or over geographic boundaries. My point is it's not only special interests that want open immigration.

    But I really hate any policy of looking the other way. I think it erodes the concept of the law. So I approve of President Trump enforcing immigration laws. Congress should change them, IMHO, making it much easier for people to come visit, work, attend events, take classes, and do whatever they want that's legal and not demanding a handout.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yeah. I used to see them several times a week on the TV screens at the gym before I got a treadmill at my hours. I put in podcasts an averted my eyes from the train wreck.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "have witnessed a lot of "games" so I'm a lot harder to fool than you may think."
    I know. I was saying, sort of snidely, that behind the masters of hilarious and brilliant schemes to make people look bad in meetings, there are hardworking and brilliant people doing actual the work.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by IndianaGary 7 years, 5 months ago
    The proper term is "Fauxcahontas" denoting the absurdity of her claim "because of her high cheek bones".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes he said "Pocahontas". I don't think she pretended to be a French Indian; I don't remember if she even claimed a particular tribe.

    The fact that everyone knew who Trump was talking about without his mentioning her other name shows that it was not clumsily done, his delivery was quite good and showed that he had thought about how to phrase it (unlike some of his other antics such during the primary debates). Most people got the joke because they have been laughing at her for years; they're laughing more now because the setting was a new and unexpected twist, and because she became so hysterical over it, with the usual irrelevant progressive outburst screaming "racist". It doesn't solve any big problems in government but it serves as an entertaining side show to temporarily relieve some tension. Back to work.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    They don't have to be "brought out of the shadows". They are in the streets and in government offices demanding government benefits and that their illegality be ignored. That isn't in the "shadows". A lot of all kinds of lawbreakers do deliberately hide in the "shadows"; the solution isn't to grant them amnesty so they no longer have to hide from law.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You have no idea? No it isn't racism. It was joke at Sen. Pockey's expense. She has been called "Pocahontas" for years because of her own obsession with race and her false claims to be a minority "native American". That is why people have been laughing at her for years and calling her "Pocahontas". No that is not racism.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    A number of items:

    1) F-Y-I, in case you suspected such, I didn't down vote any of your posts as I think you often have something to offer.
    2) I'm in the winter of my lifespan and have witnessed a lot of "games" so I'm a lot harder to fool than you may think.
    3) President Trump makes me smile far more than he makes me frown. He's witnessed a lot of "games", too, and just doesn't always play along with the rules or the agenda set by his detractors.
    4) The swamp has a resilience to being drained, but at least Trump seems to be up to the task so far.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo