10

Scientists To Eliminate The 'Hiatus'

Posted by $ nickursis 7 years, 5 months ago to Science
31 comments | Share | Flag

I know a tired subject, but it is like scientific ping pong, and it revolves around the huge cottage industry that Alphonso Gore spawned and looted. Now they will never cease to make some kind of manipulative statements, and it becomes he said, she said, with a scientific bent. Now they pull in China, as if that will magically validate a "different" take on the same old manipulated data.I don't even believe anyone has the original data anymore, it got eaten up in all their reworks to make a square peg fit a round hole.


All Comments

  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Laughing...Perfect! +++++++++++++++++++++

    We should save that one..."Outhouse based studies". No phrase say's it better than that!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Of course many scientists In fact I have heard 97% (fake percent) based on hockey stick temperature charts (fake data used) think we are doomed if we don't tax industrial activity into oblivion . Outhouse based studies funded by beneficiaries of said outhouse ....oops , I meant outcome. It does make it difficult to know the difference between shit and shinola.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Laughing...they spend way too much time in the lavatory...oops, I meant laboratory

    ...maybe I was right the first time!?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The "original" data may never be seen again in it's "original" form, as it has been sliced diced and massaged to be whatever they need...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ohiocrossroads 7 years, 5 months ago
    What a crock. The Chinese scientists have massaged data from sea buoys in one of the most inhospitable environments on earth, and found a "warming rate" of .112 degrees C per decade. That's .0112 degrees per year. Hogwash. That's not even a rounding error on the accuracy of the temperature sensors.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Flootus5 7 years, 5 months ago
    Has Al Gore seen the first Star Trek movie? He too, is a carbon based unit.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 7 years, 5 months ago
    the subject of climate change has been going on since the early 1970's when the earth was cooling. then it started warming and through all of these years the only person who I know whose life has changed is al gore who made a ton of money spouting the warming nonsense.
    it is time to give it a rest. you see the weather cycles that the earth goes through are not now, never have been or ever will be affected by human kind.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CTYankee 7 years, 5 months ago
    Interesting point about the missing 'original data'. I suspect that in climate circles the original data is any data that fits the conclusion (read as 'agenda'), and the supporting data is any data that has been massaged to support the original data.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Actually it's "anti-lectual" but it is amazing that there are people that really believe that stuff...haven't they viewed the pictures from our satellites and moon of the earth?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yea...isn't that amazing; they will not consider anything else the ancients talked about except that one.
    I for one, have observed that the annunikki were blithering idiots. Putting 2 and 2 together, I posit they died along with their proposed planet, no longer posing a threat to earth or the few conscious humans left upon it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hey, wait a minute, Planet X has gone from fringe to mainstream science in 20 years. Nibaru is now something even NASA talks about. So, maybe a no to the foundation, but leave Planet X out of it......:)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Laughing...I don't think we have to worry about soil exposure or soil warming for a looooooong time to come, certainly not in our life times or our children, our children's children or their children's, children.

    Maybe in about 40,000 years when our orbital cycle around the sun returns to a closer, more circular orbit will we see the soil warming enough to properly feed green plant life.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    These grant dependent, compartmentalized idiots don't get that the earths environment is Not a closed system. It's the sun stupid!
    I wanted to present the facts in a comment but realized it just would make no difference at all.

    You just can't fix stupid or the corrupt.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    There you are, they try so hard to sell ONE specific cause, even if it doesn't fit, and in the process, destroy their credibility, and start relying on huckster tactics. See the post at the bottom for the list of all their attempts to scare people into compliance. I do not argue that climate is changing, and there are probably a whole mix of factors, I do argue that it is all because of one root cause. It is a systemic thing, not a single item thing, IMHO.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Tats my problem, Carl, they never give any definitive data, that is understandable, yet revert to the "models". Look at the link I posted at bottom and see the list of "end of the world warnings" they have hoisted on us for the last 30 years or so....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    No other credible cause. huh How about just one of the most active sunspot periods since recording began.
    The federal scientist have their head so far up the asses of the grant givers they don't even see the sun.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Agree about the preaching.
    Even if we take a planet wide look and include the seasonal amount of sunshine any part of the globe receives it would still, as far as I have studied it, is a wash. We can't rule out, that photosynthesis possibly cleanses the carbon it intakes during the day and the oxygen it intakes during the night, though I have never read a study as to exactly how much. I do think that is probable but would not be surprised if it was just a made up liberal rant.
    The other part to consider is the ratio of carbon to oxygen in the process...is it 1 to 1? Haven't read any definitive studies on that either. I have read a few articles relating to the exhaustion of carbon by mid day in some isolated crop growing areas meaning overall, in that area, there just is not enough carbon in the atmosphere.

    I have also read reports that show Ox, CO2 and many other gasses/elements being created via the interaction of particle flows from the sun and cosmic winds in our ionosphere...so, it would seem we are fed what we need the same way the sun is by various interactions and maybe just enough to perpetuate the already ongoing processes.

    We also must factor in the carbon and water vapor cycles in lakes, streams and oceans into the overall equation.

    Come to think about it, there is no consistent amount of anything across the globe...so why would carbon/oxygen be any different.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo