10

Scientists To Eliminate The 'Hiatus'

Posted by  $  nickursis 1 year ago to Science
31 comments | Share | Flag

I know a tired subject, but it is like scientific ping pong, and it revolves around the huge cottage industry that Alphonso Gore spawned and looted. Now they will never cease to make some kind of manipulative statements, and it becomes he said, she said, with a scientific bent. Now they pull in China, as if that will magically validate a "different" take on the same old manipulated data.I don't even believe anyone has the original data anymore, it got eaten up in all their reworks to make a square peg fit a round hole.
SOURCE URL: http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/20/scientists-are-still-trying-to-convince-us-the-global-warming-hiatus-didnt-happen/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by  $  allosaur 1 year ago
    One day Mommy caught Little Global Warming Einstein's hand in the cookie jar.
    So Little Global Warming Einstein said, "Look, Mommy! See how this jar's mouth is relative to the size of my hand."
    And Mommy said, "Little Global Warming Einstein, is that some kinda sleight of hand joke?"
    "Please, Mommy," Little Global Warming Einstein said, "just keep my allowance funds a-coming. That's all I ask."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  Olduglycarl 1 year ago
    When oh when will they give up the ghost?...When oh when will they look to the ocean floor on the western side and see the volcanic eruptions there and when oh when will they realize that the western winds, coupled with the localized volcanic ocean warming causes the calving we observe and that the ocean around those calves will cool and desalinate the water which in turn will create more and thicker sea ice...the very same thick sea ice "warmers" have gotten stuck in.

    To put it more succinctly, when oh when will they realize that carbon is not a warming gas but a cooling gas, in it's cycle in the stratosphere and ionosphere and has a net beneficial effect in the troposphere where we live.

    Bring in the carbon...nature will thank you for it; and, not to mention, when oh when will they realize that the carbon cycle, the volcanic activity, the plate tectonics and the solar cycles are the very things that have made earth habitable for life and humans alike.

    I would suggest the warming creatures bend down, caress and pray, to the carbon gods... in thanks for their very own existence.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  1 year ago
      You do speak of the very root of the issue, there are many factors in the climate system, beyond one gas. Focusing on the one thing blinds the "geniuses" to all others, and is the very epitome of bad science. You need to factor all possible causes into a problem, and then find rational explanations for either why they do not, or do, have an impact. One of my main objections is: If CO2 is so damn bad, why have they stood aside as the largest carbon sink in the planet (Amazon rain-forest) is decimated year after year? Yet they would imposes taxes and restriction on all of us. Nope, go away.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by  $  Olduglycarl 1 year ago
        The Rain forest is relatively a geological recent thing...they have found remnants of large post flood civilizations there.
        In terms of carbon, like all green plant life, the carbon/oxygen cycle is basically a wash...nothing added or taken away. However, the rain forest is a valuable medicinal resource which is why they've allowed it to be destroyed. Why would they want to heal/cure anyone when robots are waiting in the wings.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by  $  1 year ago
          Well, such a large biomass still is a large exchange system of CO2 for O2, and some numbers I saw were pretty significant. While the overall equation is a wash, then just the fact that they allow such destruction with no response is indicative that their real agenda is NOT about CO2, but something else, and the medicinal/research angle may be something. I just do not like it when someone says one thing and does another, and then never says a word but continues to preach to me and demand I pay for whatever. Nope.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by  $  Olduglycarl 1 year ago
            Agree about the preaching.
            Even if we take a planet wide look and include the seasonal amount of sunshine any part of the globe receives it would still, as far as I have studied it, is a wash. We can't rule out, that photosynthesis possibly cleanses the carbon it intakes during the day and the oxygen it intakes during the night, though I have never read a study as to exactly how much. I do think that is probable but would not be surprised if it was just a made up liberal rant.
            The other part to consider is the ratio of carbon to oxygen in the process...is it 1 to 1? Haven't read any definitive studies on that either. I have read a few articles relating to the exhaustion of carbon by mid day in some isolated crop growing areas meaning overall, in that area, there just is not enough carbon in the atmosphere.

            I have also read reports that show Ox, CO2 and many other gasses/elements being created via the interaction of particle flows from the sun and cosmic winds in our ionosphere...so, it would seem we are fed what we need the same way the sun is by various interactions and maybe just enough to perpetuate the already ongoing processes.

            We also must factor in the carbon and water vapor cycles in lakes, streams and oceans into the overall equation.

            Come to think about it, there is no consistent amount of anything across the globe...so why would carbon/oxygen be any different.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by  $  1 year ago
              Tats my problem, Carl, they never give any definitive data, that is understandable, yet revert to the "models". Look at the link I posted at bottom and see the list of "end of the world warnings" they have hoisted on us for the last 30 years or so....
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CTYankee 1 year ago
    Interesting point about the missing 'original data'. I suspect that in climate circles the original data is any data that fits the conclusion (read as 'agenda'), and the supporting data is any data that has been massaged to support the original data.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 1 year ago
    the subject of climate change has been going on since the early 1970's when the earth was cooling. then it started warming and through all of these years the only person who I know whose life has changed is al gore who made a ton of money spouting the warming nonsense.
    it is time to give it a rest. you see the weather cycles that the earth goes through are not now, never have been or ever will be affected by human kind.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  1 year ago
    Coupled with an Armageddon threat of uncovering the infamous oxygen eating bacteria:

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/unearthing...

    However, we need no longer fear the banana....
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  Olduglycarl 1 year ago
      Laughing...I don't think we have to worry about soil exposure or soil warming for a looooooong time to come, certainly not in our life times or our children, our children's children or their children's, children.

      Maybe in about 40,000 years when our orbital cycle around the sun returns to a closer, more circular orbit will we see the soil warming enough to properly feed green plant life.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ohiocrossroads 1 year ago
    What a crock. The Chinese scientists have massaged data from sea buoys in one of the most inhospitable environments on earth, and found a "warming rate" of .112 degrees C per decade. That's .0112 degrees per year. Hogwash. That's not even a rounding error on the accuracy of the temperature sensors.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo