The comment has been deleted.
16

No more convincing others. Or whining here. Laser focused on finding like-minded people to associate and transact with

Posted by BrettRocketSci 7 years, 5 months ago to Going Galt
59 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

When I was new to Objectivism - in college - I became quite the proselytizer. Late night discussions in the dorm, campus events, starting a current events newspaper, buttons, stickers...

After college when the internet became more accessible, I created websites and spent a lot of time online trying to be a positive, effective, and persistent advocate for the ideas that form the basis of this unique community.

But those efforts started more than 20 years ago -- closer to 30.

While it provides significant motivation and rewards from the size of the challenge and the target-rich environment of opportunities, I also realized this humbling fact:

this work will NEVER be complete.

So how much time, effort, and money is rational for this effort? Especially when I consider that I see have many personal and family needs that are being directly compromised or threatened by unethical forces?

Then I considered who I associate with as friends,acquaintances, and business partners. If I wasn't entirely satisfied or proud of that, isn't that more important to change than strangers' philosophies who I haven't even met yet and probably never will?

I am grateful for having this online Gulch so that we can connect and interact with other like-minded people. Life is too short and precious to spend it with people who don't share your values and interests.

I've been absent here for the past few months because I've been laser-focused on taking care of some serious challenges to myself, my family, and our values.

Now I'm back - just briefly - to say that I'm re-committing to making my world into the one I want to live in. With people who share my values and orientation of the world. (The number of people not fully "awake" to what is happening around us has become a more essential issue and factor, IMO.)

We don't need the entire world to be objectivist-friendly. We can't - because it ain't ever going to happen.

After trying quite earnestly at it for many years - and watching many other people try a whole lot harder than me since the 1960s' - I can confidently say that we aren't ever going to even be close to a majority opinion.

So what is more rational - a goal achieve that ideal state of utopia?

Or - to create the best world of relationships and partnerships we can with the people who already share our world view and philosophy?

In darker or more stressful moments we may wonder when we will see a complete collapse as in Atlas Shrugged. Or another SHTF scenario that seems to have many varieties given all the threats and craziness in our world today.

If and when that happens, the smart (or "lucky") ones will have already prepared themselves and their families to have a place, a community, and a means to continue living.

That will be a Gulch of some type. Thanks to our internet, now it doesn't have to be 100% physical.

I've grown to believe that our biggest issue and need is not persuading more people that we need to live rational, productive, ethical, and peaceful lives. Rather, it is that we need to better identify and connect those of us who already share these values NOW so that we can build trust, success, and happiness amongst ourselves now - while we can enjoy all of these benefits. If and when things get more ugly - then we will all be better off too.

No fear. No regrets. And no time to waste.

If you live in northern California, or do business online and think you or others would be worth connecting with, I hope you'll reach out to me.

If you are on the Marketplace here, I know about you. :-) I encourage everyone to go to the Marketplace page, learn who is there, and think about how you can do business with them. I've done that and hope to see more people and businesses joining over time.

In future posts - possibly Marketplace listings - you'll likely hear from me again on topics related to this mission. High on my priority list is finding medical and health professionals who work on a DPC basis (Direct Primary Care). Outside of health insurance companies, in other words. They are out there, and there is a growing number of healthcare professionals who are sick and tired of becoming slaves to medical insurance companies and plans. Healthcare is something everyone has a rational reason to care about for themselves and their families too.

My name is Brett Hoffstadt. I am quite easy to find online other places if you want to. I'll be glad to hear from you here, but please understand I won't be spending much time here. Too much exciting and important work to do in other places...

My greatest enjoyment comes from making Galt's Gulch a practical reality for my life. Not for convincing others of this need or value. And there is a lot of fun work to do -- with a much more exciting and practical result.


All Comments

  • Posted by DennisJeeves 3 years, 12 months ago
    Hi all, it's been 3.5 years since this thread was last replied to.
    Did any of you connect? Either way please contact me, I would be interested.
    My own views can be found at https://quberoot.wordpress.com/

    Summary, if you don't want to read the whole thing:
    1) Get together with like minded people ( I have defined what like minded is).
    2) Work on projects for mutual benefit.

    As you can see there is nothing novel about it really (partly the theme of Galt's Gulch in Atlas Shrugged ) , but the big challenge appears that often relatively independent thinking people also come with their quirks, for example a near complete lack of effort in putting aside minor differences to co-operate with other like-minded people for mutual benefit. Independence of thought (which is good) tends to foster loner (which is bad) like tendencies.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LibertyBelle 4 years, 5 months ago
    I just wanted to say that the reason I had not visited the site in months is that I don't have a computer at home, and I was using the ones in the library; and the public libraries in Richmond were closed a long time because of the new Virus. Now
    the Main Library is limited (though mainly, apparently, for computer use), and not as much as before. But at least I can use the computers some now.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by megamail 6 years, 8 months ago
    Hi Brett,
    Interesting thread you started! Lots of philosophical debate, but not so many answering your original query. Yes. Let's connect!!!
    We are urban homesteaders of sorts in the middle of Las Vegas! (yes!). I am also an author and nutritionist.

    My husband and I will be speaking at the National Heirloom Exposition in Santa Rosa, CA, this month (on 9-11- and 9-13). Are you aware of this event? And if so do you attend this event? It is an amazing place to network with other incredibly productive people ~ not necessarily all with Objectivist thinking sadly ~ but still, many with amazing self-sustaining Producer-level knowledge. We'll personally be talking about growing food in harsh conditions, managing micro-climates and eating raw food for better energy. Please let me know if you'd like to meet up?
    ~anand

    P.S.
    I also highly recommend the Creature from Jeckyl Island. And visit Jeckyl Island sometime - It's quite a beautiful place :-)

    P.P.S.
    If anyone is ever interested to see what an Objectivist Urban Homestead in the desert looks like, you are welcomed to visit.

    http://www.wholewayhome.com
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    There is nothing in that about conceptual thought, and their conclusions from bizarre examples make no sense. How could genes have information about cars that did not exist or beaches?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    What are the 'Ayn Rand fans' you know and how do you know they are not more properly selfish than the average person? Those you read here? There are a lot of 'fans' who don't know what her philosophy is, let alone how to apply it, but may at least may avoid unearned guilt and big mistakes they otherwise would have made. You also don't know what people's personal lives are like from what you read here or hear someone saying about Ayn Rand or politics. There are also people posting here who are quite antagonistic to key principles of Ayn Rand and who shouldn't be assumed to understand, let alone be 'fans', just because they are here exploiting the forum.

    I wouldn't even begin to want to be around political fund-raisers and staffs and never have. I used to think politics was something that 'someone has to do', but because of the kind of people I saw in it -- an alien world I wanted no part of -- thought it could be ignored to pursue a productive life. Government action subsequently demonstrated otherwise. I have met a few good people in government but generally regard dealing with it as nothing but self defense. It's not just that I don't want to encourage them by being around them, I don't enjoy or want to be around them. Participation in evil can be deeper than just politics.

    But the mentality you describe of people seeking reactions from others and nothing rational for personal goals of their own is not restricted to government. You see that everywhere, though you can safely ignore such people as long as they are not exercising destructive power. It's Howard Roark in comparison with Peter Keating -- the essence of it is not political at all, though it also shows up there. The Fountainhead is not a political novel, and the essence of Atlas Shrugged isn't either -- when I first read it it didn't even occur to me to think of it that way.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    There is no evidence of innate ideas. Physical drives are not ideas. "Social conformity" in an advanced society is a complex idea, not inherited tendency. So is what is fair and counting. The ability to perceive a difference between one, two, and three is not a concept of number or counting -- if you read the claims by those who lump them together you see that they don't know what a concept it. The conceptual capacity for abstraction is not innate content. Character is the sum of choices and actions. It isn't about inheritance versus environment, but learning through choice and independent judgment versus passive absorption.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks for sharing some backstory with you, and letting me know that my post resonated.
    Perhaps what we both are talking about is that we can pursue success in many efforts. And achieve success, within those contexts. But in the bigger picture, are those pursuits really the ones we should be going after?
    Peter Drucker emphasizes that effective leadership is doing the right things effectively. Figuring out what those "right things" are is probably the biggest challenge in life. That's where a rational, reality-based, and life-affirming philosophy becomes unbeatable. :-)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 5 months ago
    Your post and rbroberg's post on giving money to political parties has me thinking. I found Ayn Rand's books by chance four years ago. The thing that stood out most about Fountainhead is it somewhat gets in the mind of people playing politics. I used to think they were people willing to lie and manipulate to get what they want in life. In Fountainhead and AS, we see people who lie and manipulate not to get what they want. They don't want anything for themselves. Getting a reaction from others is all they have in life.

    Long before I found Rand, I've gone to politicians' fundraisers for networking, fun, and to get to know politicians and their staff. Those are perfectly good reasons, but the level irrationality has increase, and I think by going I'm partly participating in evil. When I engage in discussions with people getting their jollies off other people making some other people look bad in meetings, I'm possibly encouraging it. It's time I could have been doing something else.

    Finding Ayn Rand set me on a personal journey of sorts. But I don't see her fans possess a selfish joy for life that I got from the books more than the average person I know. The average person who occasionally utters collectivist platitudes is probably more selfish and less Second Hander than the average proclaimed Ayn Rand fan. It's possible I misunderstand them and/or misunderstand Rand's writings.

    But your post resonates with me: "No Fear. No regrets. And no time to waste.
    There's a lot of fun work to do with exciting results... lots of disappointments too, which is what makes successes exciting. The computer gives me a window from my world of freedom and plenty into a miserable world where life is so bad it's bound to fall apart and anything would be better. I can't do anything for the people on the miserable side, and just looking with no purpose is gawking.

    As you say, thanks to the Internet, we have unlimited windows to look through and communicate.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Technology is a tool for whoever uses it (and is allowed to use it). It doesn't make us freer when it is used against us.

    There hasn't been a never-ending battle of people to realize their fullest potential. Most people don't, for example in the thousand years of the Dark and Middle Ages. It's a matter of choice that requires rationality with conceptual thought.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I remember something ayn Rand said about once a society restricts free speech, it is beyond saving ( or something akin to that). I am feeling all this sexual harassment craze of late is related to that. Political correctness is another way of controlling people too. I am making an effort now to speak my mind while I am still around. That’s one thing that Milo does which I think is very good. He is definitely paying a price for it though
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mia767ca 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    you will thank yourself if you read this book sooner rather than later...it will have the same impact on your life that Atlas had..
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jlc 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    ewv -

    Our difference in perspective is that I do not agree with your initial premise: "There are no innate ideas in an inevitable 'span of human character'."

    That is what I consider a 'blank slate' premise which attributes most or all of character to environment. I think that genetics has a lot to do with character. Per Steven Pinker, Matt Ridley, Richard Dawson and others, I think that we have 'onboard' a number of basic 'software modules' that are genetically loaded into our brains: Linguistic aptitude (but not language per se), fair trading, social conformity, counting 1-2 or 3,...there are several others postulated.

    I think that most people have a much higher innate tendency towards 'social conformity' than the people in the Gulch. Were there a whole lot of us, then we might be able to swing the 'conformists' into 'our camp' the way the liberal education system has swung the recent generations from the political views of the 1950's to the current POVs (good and bad). But that would not make these people independent thinkers; they would just be another flavor of conformists.

    So, if you reason from a 'blank slate' perspective, your approach is logical. If, like me, you think that there is innate inherited tendencies, then the metaphor to the bee-scouts stands as a paradigm. (Yes, there are a lot more shades of grey than I am painting, but these emails are pretty long already.)

    Jan
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You are probably right there. It's very hard to comprehend the missed value of things that you don't have because they never came to be. I've dealt with that a lot in my career, trying to pursue business and improvement opportunities.
    To hell with those who don't have the vision, appreciation, and respect for our great human potential. It's up to each of us to achieve our individual and collective greatness, and love doing it. And also protecting ourselves from their nastiness... thanks to our passion (philosophy), cleverness (reason), and modern technologies we have a lot going for us!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Bingo. Very well said. Except at the end of your comment - we shouldn't have to compromise living and associating with others. I see that as a more important mission and priority for myself now.

    With my original post and some other efforts I'm doing, I'm broadcasting to target audiences that Brett Hoffstadt is putting his money and his relationships where his philosophy is. I welcome anyone interested (and qualified) to come on board with me.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    This would be a nice debate topic. :-) Because I see that our growth in technologies is giving the individual more tools and more powerful tools to fight against the coercion and tyranny that IS ALSO on the rise.
    This is the story of human existence, is it not? The never-ending battle of people to realize their fullest potential while battling against forces opposed to it - both natural and man made.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Wow, fascinating. Working without phone and internet is almost inconceivable to me... it would have to be much different kind of work in my case. But this scenario is what I want to learn about and prepare as an option. I guess I will add this book to my very long wish list. ;-)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I haven't read his book so thanks for the reaction. The Berkeley and Left anti-free speech forces are truly remarkable for their ballsy-ness (forgive the slang). What is new today is the extent to which we have explicit and open wars happening now in our society over truth, philosophy, epistemology, politics, etc. Enemies of freedom and prosperity are getting remarkably honest and open about their beliefs - witness the "deplorables" comment.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks Jan. Yes, I'll continue to communicate. More through my actions than my talking or writing. I agree also we don't need a lot of us.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by chad 7 years, 5 months ago
    A concise and clearly put perspective on living. I enjoy teaching and have always sought the opportunity to teach others these principles and have failed to gain a wide audience. It has taken many years to realize what Estienne de la Boetie wrote in his book, 'The Will To Bondage'. It is disturbing to realize that people have what they want and freedom and liberty is not it. Most prefer slavery to living morally and it has always been so. Better to find a few friends that you can enjoy having and pursue what you like. If there was a way to make the 'slavers' leave me alone I would pursue that but it is unlikely that such a place will ever exist. I do not care that most people prefer slavery, I simply want them to leave me alone. If I am unable to convince them they should respect me and not try to convince me by the use of force to take my time and efforts to benefit them. I need a place to live alone sometimes, but sometimes I do like being around others.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Ayn Rand's stated purpose in writing Atlas Shrugged was to portray her vision of the ideal man in a plot emphasizing the role of man's mind in human existence -- by showing what happens when the mind is withdrawn. The goal of the book not being prophetic was intended as the practical result, which she found she had to remind herself as the fictional events she described kept depressingly appearing in reality while she was writing. The many "signs of success" when she wrote "Is Atlas Shrugging" (chapter 15 in Capitalism - The Unknown Ideal) were the popularity of Atlas Shrugged and the movement towards her ideas, even though they were not yet dominating. A year later, when the "Is Atlas Shrugging" article appeared in The Objectivist, she added a post script on the symbolic connection between Atlas Shrugged and the lights of NYC and the eastern seaboard going out, which was the opposite of "preventing it". For the rest of the 18 years of her life she continued to advocate acceptance of her ideas as possible, but was not optimistic about the course of the nation other than occasional events such as McGovern's welfare statism campaign's loss of the election for president in 1972.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo