Tom Steyer billionaire activist and FussionGPS customer
Steyer attacks Trump in the Uncivil War. With a huge war chest this enviro hedge fund bank cabalist is following Soros lead. I have never seen such disrespect as these swamp creatures show President Donald Trump. I am hoping our
President has read the art of war by Sun Tzu
http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/13/tom...
President has read the art of war by Sun Tzu
http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/13/tom...
That's a funny saying that I may use sometime,
but technically it's the fallacy of the converse. For some reason it makes me think of the kid in my kid's class who for some reason takes off his pants whenever it's time for computer lessons. Him getting a lot of attention does not mean he's staging an important protest.
What's on the "globalist agenda" besides people in different places wanting to communicate and trade things with one another? I would like them to put practical supersonic planes on their agenda.
Global trade ,communications and travel is not the globalist agenda.
The Globalist Agenda represents a plan to bring all of Earth's inhabitants under the control of a single, global state. Can you say taxation with out representation? There is a small, but powerful group of individuals who are the architects and instigators behind the formation and implementation of this "New World Order". Using their influence through international organizations such as the IMF, World Bank, the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, the United Nations, NATO, and hundreds of other non-governmental organizations, the objective of these internationalists is nothing less than the subjugation of everyone on the planet as servants to a one world government (servants means slaves). A government run by the same small group of elite that have ruled the masses for a very long time under various guises. These elite are the descendents of those that ruled for at least the past 2 centuries - kings and queens, bankers, robber barrons, priests, and assorted subservient oligarchs and media representatives. Their desire for a return to a one world feudal state should come as no surprise to anyone who has read a little history. It is their nature after all.
In the modern manifestation these people can be seen as kings and queens, international bankers, the military industrial complex and their servants - the corporate CEOs, scientists, professors, lawyers, heads of NGO's, politicians, and media leaders - all of whom the elite control partially or completely. Sad but true - you can buy or brainwash most national bankers, soldiers, beaurocrats, CEOs, scientists, lawyers, NGOs, politicians and journalists to say what you want them to say.
If you allow yourself to see how under the guise of keeping us all safe with anti-terrorist laws, the globalists will see all citizens gradually and incrementally lose their civil liberties preventing any dissent against either the government or the ruling elite who give the government their orders.
Interesting. I assume it's not merit-based, i.e. admitting only top wealth producers. So how do they get into this shadowy group of powerful individuals? Do they ever fall out of favor from the group by being poor business people, rejecting the mission of "subjugation of everyone on the planet as servants", or simply by making public the group's machinations?
Clearly the illegal misconduct of Obama and his Administration related to the Uranium Russia Clinton foundation looting the US. To private server lies and cover ups to Benghazi. Sheesh That is what I know about. Plenty more with Iran and the Arab Spring.
If Steyer were guilty only of "disrespect," he'd be acceptable but, from all I've seen, he too is just another HUGE government fascist.
Rational people should have, long ago, completely given up on the two old parties.
BTW I also long ago gave up on the two old parties.
Just one example: He baldly, openly, endorsed eminent domain as a presidential candidate last year, and I admire his honestly admitting he's a big-government fascist (something the Democrats never do).
But long before he became a politician, he was giving big bunches of money to the very worst of U.S. politicians, including the evil fascist Hillary Clinton -- whom, by the way, even Tom Steyer disdained! -- and he tried to use eminent domain for his own benefit, trying to chase that widow lady out of her home so he could have the room for a parking lot.
If Casey Stengel were here, he'd tell me You Could Look It Up, but right now I can't name you other specific examples of his continuing support for big government.
Now it is true he did SAY a few things, such as cutting two old regulations for one new one, a wonderful idea. But has anything other than talk resulted? I sure haven't heard (which, I admit, is not necessarily proof).
Granted, he is hampered by his (currently) own spineless Republican Party, and actively blocked by the Democrats, including the "news" media.
I watched and listened to a bit of his campaign up to and through the convention, and watched his acceptance speech.
I see nothing to make me recant.
BUT, if you have evidence to the contrary, I honestly would LOVE to see it. Thank you.
Some of us still use that term.
Socialism is government ownership. We actually, despite the mis-use and over-use of the term, have very little socialism in these United States: post office, roads, army, police, schools, courts.
But we certainly do have LOTS of fascism. Almost everything you can name is, one way or another, controlled by some government.
Even our daily lives are very much controlled and regulated by some government: Try to drive to work without your government permission to drive; try even to apply for a job without your government-issued card embossed with a government-issued number.
Don't you know EVERYTHING is Trump's fault?
Mussolini was first a Marxist -- and a journalist! as was Marx! -- and his nationalism came afterward.
And don't you see regimentation as a goal of pretty much ALL the leaders of both Democrat and Republican parties?
I do.
Except for maybe three or four members of Congress, most of the DCvers see as first choice more government as any answer.
(Actually it IS the answer if the question is What is the worst enemy of rational and freedom-loving individuals?)
And Trump has contributed nothing I know of to stem that tide.
I said, Well, then Trump is in for more attacks and trouble.
But not from me.
If that reduction is true, Trump will be the first in my lifetime.
Reagan promised it, but nothing came of it, because the Republican establishment took over his administration.
Somebody made a charade of getting rid of some agencies, but actually merely combined a bunch, with no lessening of federal parasites, uh, I mean employees.