Hillary Is America, by Robert Gore
For all of Dostoyevsky’s skill, it probably would have been beyond him to dramatically render America's degenerate descent. Hillary’s supporters believe she’s extraordinary; her detractors believe she’s a tragic anomaly. They're both wrong. The real tragedy is that in contemporary America, there’s nothing exceptional about her other than her criminality, and how exceptional is that? Shutting out reality and the truth are national pastimes. She’s not psychologically differentiated in any way from the crowd, and her access to platforms allows her to peddle what it wants to hear.
This is an excerpt. For the complete article, please click the above link.
This is an excerpt. For the complete article, please click the above link.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
I took it as a dig against Trump, who I see as telling unsophisticated voters some group who looks different from them is the cause of their problems. So "Stronger Together" is a way of saying "my opponent wants to divide you." I generally agree Trump is divisive, so it was a "good" political dig.
"each side wants to take from the other without giving up anything."
Yes. I think it's almost a natural consequence of the gov't being so big-- people fight for a share of the big gov't pie instead of going out in the world and making their own little pie. It's bad situation.
"If criticizing her for that is shameless.."
I only meant criticisms of her husbands affairs and her reaction to them.
"you said nothing about the current allegations against Hillary Clinton concerning Uranium One and the Trump Dossier."
I don't think those are lurid stories.
Uranium One: I think there's nothing to it. It think it's all politics. I'm glad they investigate it, but it sounds like nothing to me.
Trump Dossier: I suspect that there was a tacit understanding that DNC payments were being funded through that law firm to the firm that produced the dossier, and I suspect Clinton knew something like that was happening, although I don't have a guess as to whether she knew the details. The reason I think that is Clinton is experienced in politics, and Trump isn't, which makes digging up dirt a likely line of attack for a politician (good at playing dirty) against a non-politician with a history of working in TV and beauty pageants (where salacious dirt is likely to happen). So it rings true.
It's odd that the dossier didn't come out before the election. Maybe the campaign make a strategic decision that it would backfire. Or maybe the left hand really didn't know what the right hand was doing.
"Those potential crimes are as worthy, if not more so, of investigation as potential Trump-Russian collusion."
I'm glad they're investigating, keeping people honest. I have always thought the Trump-Russian "collusion" claims were bogus.
Whoa! New thought. That DID work out for the RINOs.
O was in power for 8 years. That means everyone of those RINOs had to deal with being reelected during that time frame.
Never mind. Me dino no longer views the hypocrisy as curious.
As pathetic? Yeah. Pathetic. Pathetic representation.
I want OUT of Afghanistan and IRAQ. Put that money into defense of our country. I want the elimination of the federal reserve and a return to the gold standard for the USA. No deficit spending for government at all,
Somehow I think these things would never make it past the establishment, until the establishment system just crashes. The future shown in AS was right.
That scene in 1984 where he asks OBrien what the purpose of the torture is: "The torture is the purpose." People are embracing destruction. Would they even elect a leader who is true to his wife and children? I have serious doubts.
I'm going to sit with a big glass of syrah tonight and read through this completely.
Those who defend Hillary Clinton are "shameless." To pick one of just many examples. She trashed the reputations and went after the women who accused her husband--on quite substantial grounds--of sexual harrassment, sexual assault, and rape. If criticizing her for that is shameless, then criticizing someone who criticizes her for that is even more so.
These are the same crimes for which Harvey Weinstein and others have been exposed and will be subject to both civil suits and criminal prosecution. Hillary Clinton was a potentially criminal accessory to Weinstein-like behavior, using her platform and power to denounce as "trailer park trash" and otherwise persecute a woman who won a $800,000 settlement from her husband. That's the truth, and to call someone to account for such behavior is simply telling the truth and asking that she be subject to legal process.
I notice you said nothing about the current allegations against Hillary Clinton concerning Uranium One and the Trump Dossier. I suppose my bringing it up was another "lurid cheap shot." However, there is a substantial possibility that under our "lurid cheap" laws, she committed crimes up to and including treason. Those potential crimes are as worthy, if not more so, of investigation as potential Trump-Russian collusion. If you want lurid cheap shots, check out the so-far unsubstantiated Trump dossier.
I suppose if you had to write an article about this huge problem for an audience bored by economics but able to pay attention to lurid cheap shots demonizing an individual, this is what it would look like. It could be part of the school curriculum for low-life thugs in juvenile detention who can't focus on studies but are transfixed by a brawl. Maybe they could read this and learn something unsustainable gov't.
Answer: No
They desire power and/or wealth and they use government to get it, by stealing from others.
Not sure about mccain or mr pineapple but the babuskies were globalist and possibly worse than that.
This is your 47%....That is Hiltery's America...
You don't usually see this stuff of the right...but they have their problems too.
I don't think 50% are enamored with government, we prefer to ignore it and move on with our lives, we don't like politicians and think of them as a joke.
Somewhere along the line we've become hardened by the lack of being able to do anything about it...we pay attention only at voting times and complain the rest of the time.
Now...the 47%?...different story and different idiotology that loves and believes the establishment which is made up of those strange creatures some of us viewed in the 60's and turned out even worse than what they replaced.
Even though we all have been denied true history, it's to much work to ferret out and the 47% depends upon the corrupt...they are the same and have been willingly transformed into an image the rest of us would never reflect.
I'm not sure if hiltery is an image or it's reflection but I know that she and her ilk are what nightmares are made of. Even though the 50% perhaps have not been the ever watchful Americans we should have been, I wouldn't say, by any stretch of one' imagination, "hiltery is America" or the product of America...perhaps your observation really points out that America has left us to our own bidding and is waiting somewhere for us to return, heads hung low and sorrowful.
I used to think poor character traits ,bad judgement and dishonesty coupled with criminal activity were ingredients for a failed political career. Huh