Indeed. I believe, as Ayn Rand pointed out, the power of the looters is often dependent upon the sanction of the victim. As long as white people can be brainwashed and intimidated to "shut up and sit down" or to genuflect to such demands this is going to get a lot worse.

The PC mantra of the new Jim Crow is actually quite simple:

The black man that stands up for his rights, family, and community is a hero and must be praised.
The Hispanic man that stands up for his rights, family, and community is a hero and must be praised.
The white man that stands up for his rights, family, and community is a hateful racist, oppressor, Nazi, KKK member, Alt-Right advocate, and must be put down like a rabid dog.

I lived through the "civil rights era" and though I was quite young I understood enough to truly believe in equal rights for everyone and thought privileges based on skin color were idiotic. A merit based (content of character) system made a great deal of sense. It seemed by the late '60s the nation was well on its way to achieve that goal. That is, the race based system of Jim Crow was clearly dead throughout the nation as a whole and a new era of mutual respect was rising rapidly. Millions of white people, who were privileged under the old Jim Crow, saw the merit of tearing down that racist system and worked and voted to kill it. Then in the late '70s (hardly a decade had passed!) something happened. A new Jim Crow began to form, which was the same as the old Jim Crow except the racial pecking order was changed. The REAL civil rights movement started to fail. A popular radio talk show host said the civil rights movement became the civil rights industry and it's down hill from there.

The power of the new Jim Crow requires the sanction of its victims to live and grow. And it's growing.

I agree with your position and yet as the Black woman would benefit at the show. Those Black women less mentally evolved would revel in the attention and flock to just such a show.

She was a great, talented perfoformer who broke barriers by putting up with the shit of racism. add to her talent, that she was a beautiful woman and she became an irrisistable force they had to use her or be racist so they gave her strictly "Negro" roles. But like Sammy Davis ,she broke through.

Oh, Dino! Stick a sock in it, LOL!

... can't stop laughing... you're killin' me here...

Exactly!...the same goes for "trans genders", "lesbians and homosexuals". I'm thinking we should add No Genders too!
That's what "don't ask, don't tell" was all about. It was that way in the fifties and not just in the military...and guess what...we all got along without being divided or called names.

I see I didn't need to write what I wrote in my other reply to you here this morning. :-)

pretty stupid bus driver. Probably didnt know what customer service is Back then it was politically correct to do what he did, and he wasnt about to challenge that. Today it would be the other way around.

"I stood up and offered her mine."
I was a teenager in Tampa in the early 90s. People always relinquished seats for females if the bus was full at that time, especially elderly women, out of chivalry. I've never seen that in my home town in WI. I am okay with either custom. I've never seen the blatant racism you describe. It's completely foreign to me. It's good you didn't always go along with it.

Points well taken, Mc. However, we still need a word other than simple racism to denote reactionary, vengeful, counter-racist, blowback, mirror-neurotic rejection of those not of close enough kin. This is meme warfare embedded in the emotional part of the brain. Reason is virtually helpless against that condition.

I cant understand how they could even hear what she was saying, with their cranium so far up their butts.
Lots of need for optorectomies in that crowd.