Ayn Rand on Self-Defense

Posted by LetsShrug 13 years, 5 months ago to Philosophy
17 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

The Virtue of Selfishness

“The Nature of Government,”
The Virtue of Selfishness, 108
Self-Defense

"The necessary consequence of man’s right to life is his right to self-defense. In a civilized society, force may be used only in retaliation and only against those who initiate its use. All the reasons which make the initiation of physical force an evil, make the retaliatory use of physical force a moral imperative.

If some “pacifist” society renounced the retaliatory use of force, it would be left helplessly at the mercy of the first thug who decided to be immoral. Such a society would achieve the opposite of its intention: instead of abolishing evil, it would encourage and reward it."
Ayn Rand

(Isn't it time for our schools to stop being run by pacifists?)


All Comments

  • Posted by khalling 13 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The ability to reason is metaphysical. But reasoning is epistemological.
    Things are. Knowledge is. Only ethics is concerned with good and evil, which are value judgements definitially speaking. for example, if you choose to die, then poison is good. What's good for a tiger, may not be good for you. Good and evil are relative to what you are discussing.
    "The standard of value of the Objectivist ethics—the standard by which one judges what is good or evil—is man’s life, or: that which is required for man’s survival qua man.

    Since reason is man’s basic means of survival, that which is proper to the life of a rational being is the good; that which negates, opposes or destroys it is the evil."
    Ayn Rand, The Virtue of Selfishness.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jmlesniewski 13 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Rand was not a scientist. It is their purview to discover where reason came from. In my estimation, evolution is the best explanation so far.

    As far as philosophy, what is important is that reason IS. That statement on the human condition has many implications.

    Finally, reason is ONLY epistemology. You must also look at metaphysics to understand what good and evil are. Both (m and e) come BEFORE ethics.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jmlesniewski 13 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Metaphysically, it has a lot to do with what good and evil are. If reason came from a god, that changes the rules of the universe and thus changes the definition of good and evil.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 13 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Where Man's reason comes from has nothing to do with good and evil. G and E are simply definitions of what promotes Man's well being and what prohibits it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by flanap 13 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I wonder where she reasons man's ability to reason came from? Evolved, or created, or somewhere in between? If reason has so much value, then understanding its origin must be of a more important value? Only then can we begin to define evil as opposed to good..right?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 13 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "The standard of value of the Objectivist ethics—the standard by which one judges what is good or evil—is man’s life, or: that which is required for man’s survival qua man."
    "Since reason is man’s basic means of survival, that which is proper to the life of a rational being is the good; that which negates, opposes or destroys it is the evil."
    Ayn Rand, The Virtue of Selfishness
    While you decide which of her books or lectures to read, go to the Lexicon to get specific Rand quotes and passages from her books on any topic she may have written on: aynrandlexicon.com

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by OH45458 13 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I've only read Atlas Shrugged myself, but based on that I would say that she defines anything you might do that is against your own self interest, or anything you might do which interferes with another's pursuit of same, is evil.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by terrycan 13 years, 5 months ago
    Explaining the complex in a simple way is a sign of intelligence. Ayn Rand was a very intteligent woman.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by flanap 13 years, 5 months ago
    I guess I need to read more of Ms. Rand. I didn't know she believed in evil. I would love to know here definition of said term.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo