It would only confuse them (the media and the watchers) and add to their misunderstandings and paranoia and bolt them right into a willingness to confiscate all weapons.... Why bring it up when the first topic is too much for them to grasp rationally. (The idea of freedom is already lost on them...why fan the flames?)

also, why doesn't the NRA ever articulate arguments regarding artificial markets? Ban all these weapons and now there is a strong demand in a black market for the banned items. Why is there so much border violent crime? Inner city crime? Attractive black markets compared to open free markets. Few questioned in the media take the argument in that direction.

For any of you experts out there, is it true that larger magazines have a tendency to jam and so having smaller magazines (clips? my ignorance is showing here) might be worse? I understand there is a time factor, but if you're shooting in a fish bowl-

ouch

See how easy they are to get even when they're not legal? Huh...who'd a thunk...and jinx! you owe me a coke! *slug slug**

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-nbcs...

Hmmm I do believe he was in "possession" of a high capacity magazine in D.C. where it isn't legal...me thinks someone should get fined $1000.00 and do some jail time for breaking the law.

and here it is-Arrest that man!
http://thepatriotperspective.wordpress.c...

well said

Apparently Mr. Gregory didn't hear LaPierre when he said that banning the high capacity magazines HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE and it didn't matter... it's insane (not logical Mr. Gregory) to keep trying the same thing and expecting a different result. These media brown nosers are so hopped up on banning guns they can barely discuss any other topic, or sit still. And once again, it's all just feel good bull shit that won't make a damned bit of difference when it comes to protecting schools from lunatics who KNOW they won't be met with force.