#### It is not a rope it is a Brickland current , part of the electric universe.

900,000,000 mile electromagnetic connection observed.

See https://youtu.be/3hHv5iKbRTc for why we have these electromagnetic fields.

See https://youtu.be/3hHv5iKbRTc for why we have these electromagnetic fields.

This is an excellent video. this is entertaining and

Informative.https://youtu.be/5AUA7XS0TvA

Produced by the Thunderbolts project.

Introduced to me with much appreciation by OldUglyCarl.

Similarly, the concept of the universe and its behavior has been made captive of ever more wildly creative mathematical constructs, few of which have been confirmed by experimentation. Mathematicians are famous for throwing in unsubstantiated arbitrary constants to make their formulas work, and the wildest of these have been "dark" matter and energy. This is the biggest abuse of the constant fudge factor, since dark matter is now assumed to make up about 75% of the matter that their equations say has to exist for things to agree with their descriptions.

Then there are imaginary numbers. Square root of minus one . . . arrrgh!

Pseudoscience has in contrast a long history of rationalization, often exploiting mathematical formalism which is misinterpreted as science. A lot of modern "theoretical" cosmology falls into that category but it has been common at least since Descartes and was rampant even during the 19th century alongside of and intermingled with the development of physics.

There is nothing arbitrary or improper about the methods of 'complex' numbers including the 'imaginary' 'square root of -1'. Complex numbers are quantity qualified by an angle, obeying the same algebraic rules of 'real' numbers, with multiplication generalized to multiplication supplemented with addition of the angles. It is simply a more complex method of dealing with more than one numerical measurement at a time in certain circumstances, which in turn provides powerful mathematical methods that would be impossibly complicated without it. Square root of -1 =

iis unity at the angle 90 deg; it's square is 1x1 at the angle 90 + 90 = 180, i.e., -1. There isn't anything arbitrary about it, it is a specialized use of numbers just like fractions are a specialized used of integers qualified by explicitly specified different units (in the denominators) as subdivisions of the base unit. The methods of complex numbers were established technically long before they was justified as to why they worked; but the long history of confusion about the subject has been philosophical, not mathematical.I read too much of an attempt to discard a mathematical description of science from those on this forum and a philosophical a-priori approach to objective reality. Philosophy describes reality only as a fundamental outline as to how one is to approach knowledge but not any of the details which remain hidden and need great effort to be found.

I have been on the quest for knowledge about reality for 70 years and have not found any other way toward understanding reality than by hard work in mathematics and studying the works of those who do not so easily discard the hard work of math and physical sciences for easy hand waving discarding those efforts.

Errors in application do not imply evil for either the discipline nor those who make the mistakes. Knowledge is not easy. If it were easy there would not be the innumeracy and ignorance that abounds today in the general population.

Curve fitting cannot, in cases that are not analytic, as they are with most physical theories, predict data that were not fit to the equations, i.e., the solutions or predictions of the theory will tend to diverge from later data.

You know, the other day on SS was discussed alternative explanations of exactly what is at the center of the Milky way and likely the center of every Galaxy and what was suggested was a Carbon Star or body which is why it doesn't reflect light but leaks electrical currents. Might we consider this body an atom at the center of a cell?

Seems to me that the cosmos or universe is constructed like living matter is or rather, living matter and the human body reflects the construction of the universe in some very interesting ways.

Made me consider the same thing. The attraction and repulsion as a characteristic of the orbiting bodies is fascinating. A massive energized electric Carbon star makes more sense than a black hole

With gravity sucking light .My mind can't get around gravity influencing light since it has no mass. Have a great day and be aware of the 19 th largest CME recorded coming our way .

What I was referring to is those that have a bit of time and those we take in for recovery purposes which is about 20-30% of our admissions; not to mention older workers that may be effected adversely.

We are engaged in medical cannabis and I am trying to get intervenes vitamin C as an option for patients also.

energyof emitted electrons was quantized proportional to the frequency of the impinging light: E = hv - P, where v is the frequency and P is the energy required for the electron to break free. There was a long history of the establishment of the combination of wave and particle properties ('duality') of light and of matter, and in particular the concept of the theoretical entity 'photon' as a particle associated with light was established many years later than 1905. The relativistic momentum of a photon, which has no mass, as proportional to its energy p= E/c does not mean 'as if it had mass' and is unrelated to gravitational attraction of masses. There is still no known integration of gravity and quantum mechanics. The 'bending' of light by gravitational mass is described in relativity theory without a physical explanation.