Why we need big government to save us from Natural Disasters

Posted by $ blarman 6 years, 7 months ago to News
32 comments | Share | Flag

I like posting the odd Bloomberg article here just to point out how absolutely stupid the leftists are. They argue a contradiction: that Harvey would have decimated ANY city but yet it is because of the city's (and State's) lax building codes and sprawl that the damage was so bad.

I almost posted this under Humor but there's really nothing funny. I have two siblings living in Houston and I've been getting first hand accounts almost every day of the devastation.
SOURCE URL: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-08-31/a-hard-rain-and-a-hard-lesson-for-houston


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by RobMorse 6 years, 7 months ago
    I live in Louisiana near Texas. Most of the roads in Houston are in the flood zone. It is called "the Bayou City" for a reason. Here are ten things we learned from the Hurricane Harvey and the Texas Flood 2017.
    1. AT&T was sketchy and Verizon is owned by a Cajun.
    2. The Cajun Navy and Texan Navy are better equipped than the Fed Govt and are much faster.
    3. Race does not divide us, the media divides us.
    4. CNN stands for Covers Negative News and CN stands for Cajun Navy.
    5. We will find the means to cook in any situation.
    6. All Lives Matter....including animals.
    7. No water is too deep or too shallow for passage.
    8. A Cajun and a Texan can launch a boat anywhere including roadways.
    9. Our strength is "Togetherness".
    10. Under no circumstances will we be defeated.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by term2 6 years, 7 months ago
      Those a cool observations to be sure. GEt rid of government subsidized flood insurance and it might convince people NOT to build in areas subject to such disasters. There are a lot of other areas on higher ground.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 6 years, 7 months ago
    Yes, Bloomberg, straight on left politics with the usual climate change alarmism.

    Politico, is not much different but it does put the blame elsewhere-
    ' heavily subsidized federal flood insurance. '
    building in areas with impervious soil
    ' the explosive growth of low-lying riverine and coastal development'
    http://www.politico.com/magazine/stor...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by term2 6 years, 7 months ago
      I agree get rid of subsidized insurance. If you live next to a river, expect that it will overflow its banks occasionally. Insurance companies should obviously charge more for a house next to a river or in a low lying area
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by jimjamesjames 6 years, 7 months ago
    In about 1953-54, we got our first TV. News story was about a Mississippi flood at that time. I asked my dad, "Why do people live there?" He said, "I don't know but when you live in a river bed, plan on getting wet."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by StevenRaketic 6 years, 7 months ago
    A post under humor would have eliminated some of my initial confusion when reading, then I saw Bloomberg and then I read your comment. I have a female friend there with three children, not mine, whom I have been more active in conversation with since Thursday morning before the storms landfall. I tried to give her advice without giving orders, all direct orders I gave were in the form of jokes. Every day our conversations ended with her having a solid plan to get out and go to higher, more northern, ground at her grandmas. But then the next day she never executed and then we developed new plan. So after repeating this 9 times now, and as I sit here and hear her situation becoming more dire and more helpless, all I can think to myself is that I did what I could. I told her directly to get out. She, for reasons that I can not gather, decided to stay. Her excuse was always that she had no money and could not leave. That is just nonsense and quite honestly I have to apologize for writing this now because I feel like it doesn't belong here, but what can you do for humanity? If you provide valuable advice and guidance and they can't or won't take it, what can you do? I won't send money because I've learned the lesson 100 times over that money doesn't fix things. What can you do?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 6 years, 7 months ago
    I live in las vegas where it gets quite hot (115 degrees and more) during about three months, and if there was some sort of disaster which destroyed electric power, many people would die. There is very little underground building (basements) where people could stay reasonably cool. I can just hear the leftists trying to save the people here who didnt think for themselves but just assumed that civilization will protect them from the naturally occurring heat.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by dnr 6 years, 7 months ago
    I live just south of Houston in Pearland. I commented before that our planned community of 20,000 had only 12-13 homes flooded. That is due to good engineering for flood control. Yes, the streets were rivers, but that is part of the plan. Now, the point. The topology of Houston says "flood me." It was, as mentioned, a swamp. It does not matter whether there are zero or a million zoning, etc., regulation. Houston, with 50+ inches of rain, is going to flood. (What city wouldn't?) The only way not to have floods in Houston is to not have Houston.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by term2 6 years, 7 months ago
      The leftist mentality is to do whatever you want, and the government (meaning the other people) will bail you out if something goes wrong. THAT is what caused the destruction in Houston.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by LibertyBelle 6 years, 7 months ago
    It seems to me that there are places where people
    should just not attempt to live. If they are that sub-
    ject to natural disaster, why build cities there in the
    first place.?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 6 years, 7 months ago
      I think that a lot would change if not for the Federal Flood Insurance program... Take that away and either people would build with hurricanes in mind or move!
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 6 years, 7 months ago
    Leftists ALWAYS have hidden agendas, and one should not listen to what they say and take it at face value.

    Big government almost always CANT do good things because of the way political decisions are made. Its rather simple actually.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ WilliamShipley 6 years, 7 months ago
    Require residential sprinkler systems?!?

    Clearly if cities were able to require residential sprinkler systems there wouldn't be a flood now.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by term2 6 years, 7 months ago
      Maybe the government should change the plumbing codes to require each plot of land have containment walls around it and the ability to boil off or get rid of 50 inches of rain that falls within those walls in some other way. If only THAT had been in place, nothing would have been underwater. Of course, who would have built there in the first place, but thats an unintended consequence....
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo