Prof. Michael Mann belongs in the state pen not Penn St.
Prof Michael Mann charged with contempt of court.
Refusing to turn over data used to create the infamous hockey stick graph of so called rising temps.
Refusing to turn over data used to create the infamous hockey stick graph of so called rising temps.
SOURCE URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1gMN0hu3PI
That should be front page news across the world!
Eyes should now turn to those PC government officials who handed him the public funds so he could further push their BS.
Will that justice ever happen? Nah!
Public servants
More to the point, Mann is really prosecuting a different lawsuit: Earth v. Humanity. The allegation: negligent "geocide." Even if he could find a court of competent jurisdiction--and even if we could not file to have the case dismissed for lack of subject-matter and personal jurisdiction--he still would have to show the data to prove the merits of his case!
Answer: The baseline periods are not the same period.
baseline temperature is typically computed by averaging 30 or more years of temperature data.
Regardless, the post is regarding this shameful scientists bitter and embarrassing defeat for the self-styled ‘Nobel Prize winner’ who acted as if he was the epitome of virtue, this outcome shames not only Michael Mann, but puts the climate science community in crisis. Many hundreds of peer-reviewed papers cite Mann’s work, which is now effectively junked. Despite having deep-pocketed backers willing and able to feed his ego as a publicity-seeking mouthpiece against skeptics, Mann’s credibility as a champion of environmentalism is in tatters.
But it gets worse for the litigious Penn State professor. Close behind Dr Ball is celebrated writer Mark Steyn. Steyn also defends himself against another one of Mann’s SLAPP suits – this time in Washington DC. Steyn boldly claims Mann “has perverted the norms of science on an industrial scale.” Esteemed American climate scientist, Dr Judith Curry, has submitted to the court an Amicus Curiae legal brief exposing Mann. The world can now see that his six-year legal gambit to silence his most effective critics and chill scientific debate has spectacularly backfired.
For ClimateRealizer the time period is on the left side just below the globe : CFSR 1979-2000 Baseline
The Weatherbell uses 10 years more recent data for the baseline.
I agree, Mann should have sealed his own fate if there is reason used.
Hundreds of papers based on Manns hockey stick are now worth less than charmin TP.
Thanks Dr Bell! http://principia-scientific.org/break...