11

How Classic Cartoons Created a Culturally Literate Generation

Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 years, 9 months ago to Entertainment
41 comments | Share | Flag

Who'd a thunk! Wow, wow, wow...never would of guessed.

It is well known that TV in the 40's and 50's was loaded with moral lessons. but, also taught cultural literacy in our cartoons?

I liked Dr. Peabody and his wayback machine...probably fueled my attraction to Dr. Who many years later.

Maybe this is how we change the culture and combat global stupidity.

I wonder if AR was ever the subject of a cartoon? Found some stuff from the Simpsons but nothing older than that. https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/se...
SOURCE URL: http://www.intellectualtakeout.org/article/how-classic-cartoons-created-culturally-literate-generation?roi=echo3-45425714395-43344650-a4781f54254e30e3be3e6a2d5a6f6997


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ blarman 6 years, 9 months ago
    I remember growing up watching He-Man, GI Joe, and a variety of other cartoons that always ended with a moral lesson. Now children of today not only lack that moral lesson, but get bombarded with absolute stupidity (Sponge Bob, Ed, Edd, and Eddie and a whole host of others) not to mention Earthism (Pokemon) and other destructive im_morals. Even in the old TV shows like _Andy Griffith, the old Westerns, Little House on the Prairie, The Waltons and many of the Family shows of the 80's there were moral lessons in each episode. Good grief! Even Archie Bunker in his loud-mouthed way railed about the dangers of government.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by CircuitGuy 6 years, 9 months ago
      Little House on the Prairie is awesome for kids. The didactic themes are part of the stories, not an afterthought at the end to meet some mandate. I love the way the characters generally speak to one another with respect, even if they disagree.

      They don't have that Canadian-accented sass that the modern shows have. Apparently that's like the cool irreverent way to speak now. To me it just sounds contemptuous and makes the person doing the hammed-up sass look silly. Maybe I'm getting old.

      Anyway, we encourage our kids to watch Little House. Even the religious messages, which I don't agree with, I am fine with because the characters are respectful, and we need to learn to respect people with other religions.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 6 years, 9 months ago
    Tom and Jerry excursion into classic piano, was great. But the best short was the storm from William Tell by Rossini. Mickey is the conductor and as the music gets wilder so does the storm until it is tossing the musicians around. And let's not forget Fantasia. I wound up buying recordings of every piece in that film, and had dinosaurs tromping through my head via Rite of Spring
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 6 years, 9 months ago
      You had Dinos in your head?!
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Herb7734 6 years, 9 months ago
        You bet.
        It wasn't until I saw the actual ballet that I realized it wasn't really about dinosaurs. Also there was about 10 seconds of nudity in the performance, and it was the first time I saw a woman's bare breasts, which I treasured for many years. Now, boys are subject to this sort of thing by age five. And not in such high class setting.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 6 years, 9 months ago
          Yea...even back then..."a peek" was done in with reverence and respect.

          We are not "Old" Herb...We are Correct, Moral and Respectful...well...that last one is a toughy these days...you just can't go around re-booting peoples heads...but boy is it tempting.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by Herb7734 6 years, 9 months ago
            "Yesterday a glimpse of stocking,
            Was looked upon as simply shocking,
            But today, goodness knows,
            Anything goes."
            -- Cole Porter
            A beautiful woman, sexually draped is enticing, but take it one step further and it is just.....
            anatomy. Women have known that for centuries, men - not so much.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 6 years, 9 months ago
    There are few contemporary series on the air that provide pro-free market, pro-individual liberty moral lessons. Star Trek (the original series) was a good series, in part, because it did.
    Babylon Five was another superb series that
    was an entertaining moral lesson in the entire 5 year arc without statist propaganda bias.
    There is a very good current series from Canada Broadcasting, (available in the US by subscription through Acorn tv or by using a vpn) that I recommend highly for moral lessons, praise to productive inventors, scientific ingenuity, and imaginative entertainment: The Murdoch Mysteries. (The writers even manage to convey progress of women's suffrage without insulting biased feminist attitudes so prevalent in US programming.)
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 6 years, 9 months ago
    Up until now, I haven't watched a Warner Brothers cartoon since the early 60s, no, the late 50s, I think.
    I recall during the 50s, I recall a cartoon festival where the admission was a can of food for the poor and that theater was loaded with kiddies watching back-to-back Warner Brothers.
    Later on during the 60s I did watch some Bullwinkle, The Flintstones and The Jetsons, the latter two prime time, I think.
    Oh, yeah, animated Peanuts and Christmas specials also.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Stormi 6 years, 9 months ago
    We got such good messages, from TV, cartoons and comic books - Classics Illustrated. We learned to love our country, respect our parents, want to grow up and work! Welfare and subsidies did not exist, not even in cartoons. TV shows like "Route 66" gave us characters like Buz who was into personal responsibility and tough love. The show centered itself around worrking class people. Of course, in Chicago style, Me TV has taken the reruns off in favor of ALF and Mama's Family! Even Brit TV gave us the Avengers, with a smart and self-reliant lead in Emma Peel, long before our idiot feminist got in the act. Comedians knew they were entertainers, many were war veterans, and they knew their role was to entertain, not be nasty political hacks. Daniel Boone gave us s coexisting races respecting each other and working hard to support their families. Today we have immature parents being run by out of control kids as the basis of the TV sitcoms, blacks making idiots of themselves in the same genre. Obnoxious carton characters act as political pundits. Schools don't try to rasie people up, but to make them dome down until all are dumb. Blacks used to speak perfect English in my school, today, they can't pronounce common words correctly, but teachers think they are honoring their roots! The cowboy shows always ended with a message from the lead to be good little buckaroos and respet teir parents. One of my fondest memories is seeing Gene Autry in person with my grandpa.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ AJAshinoff 6 years, 9 months ago
    and today they contend that there is no influence behind TV and cartoons while everything and anything TV is flooded with not-so-subtle social statements, usually contrary to parents values.

    I'd say Ironman and Captain America added more to my youthful morality and work ethic than anything else..including my hippie parents. Today I wouldn't recommend comics or any TV cartoon for kids..mind mush drivel indoctrinating children while mom and/or dad get me-time.

    Loved Johnny Quest (never cared for He-Man)
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 6 years, 9 months ago
    Annie Holmquist has the cart before the horse: she misunderstands cause and effect. The cartoons of the times were just a medium of expression, as were films, or television. They only presented what people wanted to see.

    The cartoons referenced in the article in particular were not intended for children. They were fillers for feature presentations of cinema at movie theaters. They were amusement for adults. However, as Ayn Rand cogently pointed out, every work of art presents a philosophy. I can only recommend that anyone who is interested in the aesthetics of theater read The Romantic Manifesto. Ayn Rand would have classified those cartoons as "bootleg romanticism" a "depths at their heights" delivery of the best people knew vaguely that they needed and enjoyed.

    You can get the same sense of life - and the same intellectual entendres - from good Hollywood films of the 1940s and 50s. Kathryn Hepburn's monologue at the climax of The Desk Set is a string of literary allusions. But all is not lost... How about the dialog on starting sentences with conjunctions from Finding Forrester?

    We still enjoy watching West Wing episodes because it was a show about writers for writers. The dialog includes very many tidbits of information - and some interesting errors, just to see if you are paying attention...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 6 years, 9 months ago
      And that's all fine and dandy, but the larger point was that no matter if they were cinematic presentations or bootleg romanticism they still introduced young minds to these concepts and culture, even if it was only on a subconscious level.
      By measure, the cartoons of those times were a whole lot more grown up than the dribble promoted today.

      And...most of us at the time not only enjoyed the cartoons and citcoms of the times but we also saw the feature films you mention, even if the messages were lost upon the young, it was still an introduction.
      That's more exposure than the young and older get in today's culture...just look how hard it is to introduce AR to the present generations.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 6 years, 9 months ago
        It is not hard at all to introduce Ayn Rand to young people. In fact, they are most of the readers. You should goto the Ayn Rand Institute site and find their essay contests. Many of the winners come in blocs from Catholic schools. But what they do not do is go online to complain with others about the liberal left progressives who have ruined their world... because they are too busy making their own. We are a bunch of grumpy old men. Don't let the skew confirm your biases.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by jimjamesjames 6 years, 9 months ago
    I recently ran across the old Westinghouse Studio One tv shows from the 1950s on Amazon Fire. Terrible copies but the two subjects I came across were the stories of John Peter Zinger, touting the free speech issue in the 1740s and one on James Otis and the Writs of Assistance issue in 1761. One starred Charleton Heston. Neither would be shown today, too much reality for the public to deal with. But it does affirm that producers, in those days, were aware of the importance of telling those stories for the elucidation of the public to the historical foundations of what we are (and should be) Just found them on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDGIg... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SpdQ6...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo