I realize that, it just irks me a bit that I have a permit to carry, but I can't buy out of state without having it shipped to an FFL. Free interstate commerce. Perhaps the carry permit should also authorize purchase in other states. It does authorize purchase and immediate transfer in Washington State.
Many of the laws we have today have nothing to do with their supposed intent. Many are just revenue generators and only enacted to make the innocent guilty. It all amounts to control, registration, government employment, and enforcement to make it happen. Hopefully the suppressor laws will disappear then perhaps I can sue the government for my loss of hearing.
The recent case Perata v. California tried to establish a right to carry, or at least to force California to make its discretionary issue of carry permits less arbitrary. But only 2 members of the Supreme Court voted to hear the case. (It takes 4, on the theory that a case that four justices believe may have merit might convince a fifth.)
So any further improvement of gun rights, at least in the 9th circuit, will have to wait until at least one more conservative, maybe two, is on the Supreme Court.
Since all states have agreed to the Constitution, they cannot now create parameters outside the words of the Second Amendment, neither can Congress unless it's willing to open a Convention which may prove to be not in the best interest of the nation.
A step in the right direction. I'm wonder if that dealer in Arizona still has that piece I wanted the last time I was down there. I was going to have my friend, an Arizona resident, buy it for me, when I found out I couldn't. I was then told they wouldn't sell it to anyone now for awhile because they were aware it would probably be for me. I was astounded, but took their word for it. Is this something like having to commit the crime before being accused of iit?
Yay! Up until now, I never considered buying a firearm out-of-state for living in a centralized portion of Alabama. I'm age 70 always supportive of gaining more freedom after spending most of my years of watching freedom shrink.
Judge Reed O’Connor just added his name to the short list for the supreme court.
Now, Judge O'Connor, about that unconstitutional 1934 National Firearms Act that was upheld only because there was no one to speak before the court for the rights of the people ...
Many of the laws we have today have nothing to do with their supposed intent. Many are just revenue generators and only enacted to make the innocent guilty. It all amounts to control, registration, government employment, and enforcement to make it happen. Hopefully the suppressor laws will disappear then perhaps I can sue the government for my loss of hearing.
So any further improvement of gun rights, at least in the 9th circuit, will have to wait until at least one more conservative, maybe two, is on the Supreme Court.
rules the same way.
I'm age 70 always supportive of gaining more freedom after spending most of my years of watching freedom shrink.
Now, Judge O'Connor, about that unconstitutional 1934 National Firearms Act that was upheld only because there was no one to speak before the court for the rights of the people ...