Is it just me, or is this situation the perfect contrasted examples of the outcomes of "looting" versus objectivism, i.e., literal "death panels" as a result of the decision that receiving health care is a right (thus having the government make the decision that death is better than expensive treatments), rather than health care being a publicly accessible but ultimately a private decision to pay (or not) for experimental treatment (knowing full well it is unlikely, but possible, to succeed)?