Gender Equality is Basically a Farce, Study Suggests
We each are just as different on the inside as we are on the outside.
One is no better than the other...we each are 1/2 of the total equation.
It would be pretty confusing and boring if it wasn't this way.
One is no better than the other...we each are 1/2 of the total equation.
It would be pretty confusing and boring if it wasn't this way.
As explained elsewhere on this post: Gender is only a reference in words as to which half we are speaking and writing about; ie, He or She...nothing more.
(I just made that up but is observable)
I am personally grateful to be born in a generation when society did not require a male caretaker for me. I am also, as a martial artist, very aware that while men are stronger than I am, that does not mean that I cannot beat the crap outta them for fun or in need.
Jan
However, no matter what females choose to do the American culture will always value them highly...unless feminist and their nonsense continues dividing us further, we won't find ourselves on separate planets any time soon.
I still think that men and women are each half of a permanent quantum entanglement that benefits existence itself.
Yes, it is cultural. Thank goodness our culture has changed for the better in this respect. What we have to do is rein in the absurdity of where liberal Feminism has currently gone and is going.
As with most things, women do not need 'help', we just need to not be blocked from doing everything that we can do.
Jan
We aim for survival, safety, comfort and continuity through all the protocols and organization practiced by consensus or force. The dizzying variety of social establishments, from utter slavery to militant egalitarianism, are all experiments in natural selection.
In our time, we are in the midst of consciously evolving equal rights for all individuals, regardless of gender. Feminism in demanding equal rights, equal pay, equal authority, choice of roles, is saddling females with greater burdens: education, careers, and childbearing. Some even want equal participation in the military. Good luck, ladies.
For survival, pregnant females need protection, mostly supplied by males. Division of labor, specialization of functions are more efficient. Females in our enlightened times should have the right to choose for themselves how to conduct their lives and whether to consent to lending their bodies to reproduction. All their hormones push in that direction. Pregnancy and childbirth could interrupt a high-flying career, but such a female would have resources to hire nannies and not tie herself down to the daily grind of diapers and formulas.
The equality demanded by each individual is the right to decide how to run their lives, in cooperation with their fellow humans. Equal but different, different but equal—no one dictating to anyone else, all interacting only by mutual consent. And that includes whether to be impregnated, and by whom. Only women can exercise that right. We can only wonder how many more experiments of social formation humans will have to struggle through to reach a rational consensus of individual rights.
Or, more historically speaking: Stalin's useful idiots morphed into useless idiots...
Moreover, we know from other life on this planet that sex is mutable. Some fish and frogs change their sex. Male geese will bond and build a nest, but never laying eggs, they never stop decorating it.
If we can identify all 6500 genes that determine sex in humans, then we can control them and more perfectly change our sexes as we change our clothes. After all, the necktie originally was women's wear.
Finally, do not confuse "equality" with "equivalency." Gender equality refers to rights (natural rights and social rights), such as the social right to vote or the natural right to own property. Both of those were denied to women on the ground that they were not "equal" to men.
The modern necktie evolved from the cravat, which was used originally as a military unit designation - not ladies fashion.
The change is real, whether or not it is 'natural' is moot.
Jan
Jan
I'm afraid they will no longer be human...that seems to be the trend of the non-conscious, compartmentalized scientist and humanoidal delete class of creatures.
I am looking forward to where people can chose to sculpt their bodies the way we select the next car we will buy.
Insofar as transhumanizing devices: when they get a memory chip for humans, sign me up.
Jan, wishes she could remember why...
That adaption is SCUBA gear now, and could be genetic modification later. The same applies to wings ... or anything else, even living in outer space...
Yes, the modern necktie - cravat - was worn as a good luck piece by Croat mercenaries. But that was not its first or only instantiation. And as "men's wear" it is still in our day available as fashion for women. The tit-for-tat on the history of fashion does not address the fundamental issue.
Perhaps when (if) the day comes when the underlying structure of a being can be modified at will to morph it into something else at all levels, then this conversation can begin anew.
The Amazons were a myth from ancient Greece.
Women achieved equal treatment in 1970, and have since gone on to undeserved favorable treatment by the law. I want equal treatment back. Their claim to continued victim status is BS. The "wage gap" is nothing but women choosing less stressful jobs. TANSTAAFL.
As for the "trans" people, I see them as practicing nothing more than a form of cosmetic surgery. It's none of my business if you want to get bunny ears grafted on your head, but if you insist I look at them, I'll laugh.
Jan
Jan
I've been wondering though, if the 3000ppb carbon of the past may have had an influence in their size and the size of the Dinosaurs as well.
The magic thingie is well known in mythology: It is an item that is real - a bronze cauldron, a steel sword, a man riding a horse - which is put into legend because it is unique to the current culture. It subsequently becomes more and more miraculous (a cauldron that is never empty) so that it continues to be spectacular (ie in an era when bronze cauldrons are now common).
The second is that there were lots of branches of the human tree wandering around. Encounters between H sapiens sapiens and other branches might have described the other branches as giants; maybe they were taller, maybe not. (There is doubt that the giants of Norse myth were considered huge in early references.)
So I do not think that there were Nephilim per se.
Jan
Still finding them in the middle east and other places in the world.
I myself doubt that they ever reached 15' plus but some photos are convincing. That's why I say that they must have developed during times of very high carbon counts in nature. Certainly there were plenty of resources to support such creatures because they were around for a long time...they are mentioned in tablets all over the world.
PS...they were not human like we are.
Yes, I agree that equality with respect to rights can exist independently of equivalency.
Also, the term "man" was used to refer to men, women and even non-humans in English up through about the 12th Century; it retains that use only in a narrow liturgical context, ie the Virgin Mary is "blessed amongst men".
Jan
Jan