Big Surprise: Hitlery voters Give Trump Low Marks for First 100 Days: NBC News/WSJ Poll

Posted by freedomforall 1 month ago to Politics
36 comments | Share | Flag

The title of the article is rubbish so I changed it to the truth. If you look at the demographic chart in the article it shows 93% of Hitlery voters give Trump poor marks. Hitlery got 50% of the votes so 93% x 50% = 46.5%
Big surprise that the poll shows 45% say Trump performance was poor. It appears Trump has won over a few of the irrational idiots who voted for Hitlery and kept all the Trump voters, too.
SOURCE URL: http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/public-gives-trump-low-marks-first-100-days-nbc-news-n749756


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by NealS 1 month ago
    OMG, I'm so shocked, I would have never guessed (NBC/WSJ). If they keep it up more people (with brains that might still be able to think for themselves) may start to understand just how dangerous these people and their actions are, people acting like this on false premises, just for spite, and because of pure prejudiced hate. It will destroy the country from personal blind prejudice. The other scenario, keep it up and we might even get to term limits for our representatives, perhaps putting it to a vote rather than letting our representatives decide for themselves. This is not good, what they are doing to this country, and telling the world to be prejudiced against us under false reporting of false knowledge, it's got to stop. I'm to the point anymore of telling those that act like this around me to just knock it off, check out the facts, study history, and get out of my life.

    Today, after hearing more slander is coming out against FOX, there are only two agencies left that are pro-conservative, FOX and PragerU. The rest, other than a few privatized internet services, have all gone by the wayside. We can't let this one sided media thing continue. We need to teach and change minds one at a time if necessary. Think about that, if everyone on the right was able to change at least one mind, where might this country, still the best in the world, go? I've been sending links from PragerU to those that still send me propaganda on any subject. PragerU seems to have a short 3-4 minute dissertation on every subject. I'm even sending them a donation today.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  jbrenner 1 month ago
    So far Trump gets an incomplete for his grade thus far. He hasn't done nearly as much as he thought he would. This is no surprise. The system is designed to be an obstruction.

    He may have to call in RotoRooter to drain the swamp. His biggest, but far from only, mistake so far was to let Paul Ryan handle Repeal & Replace. "Repeal" wasn't much of a repeal. Paul Ryan is a big, well-rooted part of the swamp.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  Abaco 1 month ago
      I say the same. However, I am reminded by a good friend/coworker that Trump already achieved the primary goal - stopping Hitlery. When I think about what could have happened had she won the election I get chills. I was on the phone with a developer in Panama leading up to the election. I can only tolerate so much and I am sure she would have crossed the line... Now, at least we should have 4 years more time to gather resources, plan, research and enjoy a cold one on American soil.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  nickursis 1 month ago
    The whole situation is so sad that such power has infiltrated our society. It is now so polarized that no rational thought goes into anything, just knee jerk gut reation. There is an article on Fox that the Judge who killed Trumps ban on sanctuary cities just happened to bundle 200K in donations for Obama. Really, I can't believe a Judge would ever make a decision based on politics, but on the law, after all, they are sworn to uphold it...yuch....
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 1 month ago
    I agree the numbers are ambiguous, not surprisingly low marks.

    54% of voters voted for someone else, yet only 45% said he's off to a Poor start. That means many voters who didn't vote for him graded the start Fair or higher.

    OTOH, 46% of voters voted for him, yet Great + Good = 35%. So some people who voted for him are not satisfied.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo