Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years ago
    I have no info on this case other than what is in this article, BUT
    1) if the prosecution has evidence of espionage, then why are the charges "obstruction of justice and making false statements to the Federal Bureau of Investigation" ?
    and if they prosecute this person who allegedly received gifts from foreign agents for "obstruction of justice and making false statements to the Federal Bureau of Investigation" then why has Hitlery not been prosecuted for the same things since there is at least as much evidence against Hitlery?

    The charges of "obstruction of justice and making false statements to the Federal Bureau of Investigation" are the charges that are used when the feds have no evidence of anything other than the accused wanting to keep innocent private actions away from government agents who are violating the constitution.

    It is possible that this person is guilty of something, but the feds are guilty of much worse and the feds never get punished even when they burn innocent people alive.

    I do not trust anything that anyone at the FBI says. Jack booted thugs.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 7 years ago
      Not arguing, it is clear something is amiss. Part of the problem is facts are manipulated as weapons in DC, and leaks are used as a way to either affirm or deny facts, so as to muddy the water sufficient to make it impossible to ever know what was talked about in the first place. Another point was this woman spent all of the Obama empire years and is just another example of how the touted "integrity" of the Obama gang, vs the world, is a myth.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo