Ayn Rand On Gun Control

Posted by khalling 12 years, 2 months ago to Philosophy
21 comments | Share | Flag

"In Atlas Shrugged, Hank Rearden carries a handgun: "He carried a gun in his pocket, as advised by the policemen of the radio car that patrolled the roads; they had warned him that no road was safe after dark, these days." Passing over the irony that Rand has the police in a highly collectivist state advising a private individual to carry a gun, there is nothing in this passage to suggest support for gun control. It could be interpreted to suggest the opposite, since Rand has one of her heros carrying a privately owned gun, and even contemplating (later in the passage) its use against the police. (In subsequent passages of the novel, other of Rand's heros, including Dagny Taggart and Francisco D'Anconia, use guns."


All Comments

  • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 12 years, 2 months ago
    In _The Night of January the 16th_ the protagonists attempt to get away with a financial swindle by faking a suicide. It was a LITERARY DEVICE not an ideological assertion in a philosophical discussion. Ayn Rand did not advocate financial swindles or fake suicides.

    The question is whether the purchase and sale of firearms should be regulated by the government and Ayn Rand said that it is not important. She said that she saw no reason not to require such registrations. She said that in the context of a (NON-FICTION) discussion of the philosophic issues in current events.

    Ayn Rand believed that a woman has a right to terminate her pregnancy. However, in _We the Living_ an example of a careless abortion and its aftermath show the degradation of life and living standards. Also, of course, in WTL, women in college pursue engineering as careers. That was an important element in communist ideology: breaking down the bourgeois family with its enslavement of women. In _Atlas Shrugged_, our heroine is exactly that kind of independent woman. But in that, Rand was not advocating Bolshevism or the destruction of the bourgeois family.

    In _The Fountainhead_ Howard Roark and Mike Donnigan meet in a speakeasy. It is easy to expect that like millions of Americans, Rand herself probably violated the Eighteenth Amendment until the passage of the 21st. It remains, however, that any criminal enterprise entails consequences: criminal gangs resort to murder; lack of respect for the law spills over into other spheres of life. Ayn Rand never advocated drug-running, bookmaking, or prostitution as careers for young people to pursue. She only had two characters meet in a speakeasy.

    In _Atlas Shrugged_, Ragnar Danneskjo"ld robs government cargo ships and sells the merchandise for gold, which he distributes to various capitalists - presumably after paying his crew and taking his entrepreneurial reward. If you goto http://www.USA.gov, and enter "warehouse" in the search field, you can find a long list of rich targets. Hopefully no one reading this actually thinks that Ayn Rand recommended anything like that kind of criminal activity. Whatever Ayn Rand advocated as social policy or social action, she explained in her non-fiction.

    We know that people look into the Bible for answers to daily problems. At best the Bible is a (questionable) history of the Jewish people (and one of their sects). Other people read the Quran - which mentions Jesus 25 times, calling him the Son of God and which calls Mary "the Virgin" and "the Mother of God." During the Renaissance, a popular trend of bibliomancy was applied to Dante's Trilogy. When seeking guidance in their daily lives, people would open Dante at random and read a passage. The _I Ching_ is another book of interpretable wisdom based on the random tossing of yarrow stalks or coins. Atlas Shrugged is not a holy book in which you will find the answers to life's problems.

    Even the speeches that elucidate philosophical principles behind the actions of the characters are only that. Books and movies have such moments in which antagonists confront each other and say what they mean. (A Saturday Night Live skit has Blofeld, Goldfinger, and Dr. No on a talk show, giving advice to would-be evil masterminds. "When you capture James Bond, just kill him! Don't go rambling off into a monologue!") The speech is a literary device. In the works of Ayn Rand, the speeches are great sources of succinct statements that are easy for productive, rational, realistic people to endorse. But, please, do not toss three gold coins, add up their dates, and find a range of words to guide your daily actions.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 12 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    lol... Yeah...I avoid philosophy. I don't like that stuff. ??!!
    Usually the category gives an indicator if there's a link...in this case it just said philosophy and I ASSumed it didn't have a link. How many Hail Mary's do I have to say?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 12 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    you don't click on posts with Philosophy as the category? As a rule or just this time? ;)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ KahnQuest 12 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Haha - no worries, Shrug. As for philosophy, I don't think Rand was anti-gun, either. Considering her philosophy and background, I can't imagine she would have been.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 12 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Oh. There's an article attached to this post? lol (The blue philosophy in the header misled me, sorry..)
    I'm sure the policeman thought it smart for Rearden to carry a gun. When I read AS I never had the inkling that Rand was anti gun whatsoever. I still don't think she was...it doesn't add up with having a right to meet force with force.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 12 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I can see the point Shrug. Hank Reardon would be recognized and targeted more readily than the average stiff who probably has little to steal. Thats not to say we can't all carry but that it is more prudent for someone like Hank to carry.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ KahnQuest 12 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Sorry - I should have indicated my change in perspective. The point was that the officer's belief didn't necessarily match his employer's. My guess is that the officer (officer's POV here) thought Rearden needed to carry, in order to protect himself from the riffraff.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 12 years, 2 months ago
    Force must be met with force... I just read that in one of Rand's book the other day...quote might not be perfect, but close enough. How else can you meet force without a gun? She doesn't like guns when brutes have them to sway. Guns have no place in a room with a meeting of minds. Or something like that. I don't believe she was anti gun and if she was it works totally against individual rights and the love of life.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 12 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Of course Hank Reardon should carry because he's a well known tycoon. WHAT???? His life is worth more than mine...or yours? We should all have the right to carry to defend our lives. I am of no danger to anyone who is not first a danger to me. Said, tycoonless me. Sheesh.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ KahnQuest 12 years, 2 months ago
    I found this part of the article interesting as well. The missing distinction is between "the police" and "the policemen." I've often found that individual police officers have opinions that differ from the official opinion of the police department. For instance, when NM first got concealed carry there was a lot of hand wringing at the top, but all of the cops I know were glad to see it. And even if the policemen do agree with the collectivist state, Hank Rearden is a well-known tycoon. Of course he should carry, or at least have some bodyguards (who carry). The state doesn't want Rearden dead, it wants him subdued.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo