Three Geogia schools consider keeping AR-15's on site

Posted by Non_mooching_artist 11 years, 8 months ago to Education
24 comments | Share | Flag

There's some hyperbole here, but otherwise a good bit of info.


All Comments

  • Posted by 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    We the last conservative holdout in the state. Our state rep is awesome, and she supports the second amendment. Love her! And she's never missed a vote. Takes her job seriously.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That's great...surprising considering all the CT laws going into affect. I don't know why any are apposed to it. The PC crud has to die.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Mass shootings almost always happen in gun free zone. It just makes sense for someone to be prepared to defend the kids.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    We have cops in our schools, who carry pistols. Ready to use. I like that. They always have though, even before Sandy Hook. Just an all around deterrent. Our HS principal carries.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The result of 30+ years of progressive education is that most parents today are idiots. They need to treated as such. Ignore them-do what is right and eventually they shut up and go back to downloading fart apps for their smart phones.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I always thought that we should publicly state that any teacher or school administrator who submits to a background check is permitted to carry on school grounds. That ends it. These nut cases won't open fire if they don't know who does and does not have a gun.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thank you. In my opinion if there are guns on campuses (and I'm a big advocate for this) then they should be on a person at all times, loaded and ready. Preferably concealed so no one knows who has them...the more the better. The kids don't even need to know for that matter. Parents are paranoid, they have an irrational fear and the schools typically reenforce that paranoia with the whole "no finger gun playing at recess" crap. Guns=evil by default. Another reason to home school. The lock down drill at my school is the hide in a corner....and wait. That accomplishes nothing... quack quack.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Still within reach..... If you have to dig out a key or punch in a combination...or hope the person who has access isn't in the crapper or out to lunch it is not "within reach" and it is not an advantage whatsoever. Their only saving grace is that they have pistols on their hips. (I HOPE that's where they are...and LOADED.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Point taken on the key and access. We want to keep them away from the kids and the bad guys but you are right. When you need them you need them now.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Rocky_Road 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The lock down of the rifles would be necessary for the parents to go along with this. I can see that.

    They are still within reach, and any advantage is a plus.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Guess I should have kept reading...I didn't know they already had pistols. The thing with locking them up... who has the key?, what if that person is hit first of off sick or on the other side of the school. I don't like the idea of having guns for protection that are locked up. When you need one you need it NOW. I commend them for having pistols. All schools should.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I disagree . The fact that they are there is a deterrant. I assume the guards will continue to carry hand guns as a first line of defense. The AR-15 would be for the extreme cases. I like the idea.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo