How many more people have to be injured. We need to raise awareness.

maybe beer lines should be Kant-free zones

I don't either. I save the philosophy discussion for the drinking of beer.

I still don't know this about you. If you are one of them robots...

I do.

They said the injuries were not life threatening. If they were then it wouldn't be a non-lethal pistol now would it. I generally don't discuss philosophy when buying beer. Now I know why.

you don't know this about me, but...

Next time you go out be sure and have a non-lethal weapon for protection.

Kant did argue against reason.

What is a nonlethal pistol?

"What is a nonlethal pistol? "

It is what I will own, when ammo finally shows up on the shelf for $10 per round.

When i was in Norway for two months in 1988 I had an opportunity to taste some unlabeled black market vodka direct from the USSR. The woman whose apartment I shared kept it in her freezer (and old time ice box actually). Based on that taste I doubt they would waste vodka in that way. :)

Squirt gun filled with Vodka?

Air gun?

Just to clarify so that it's fully understood:
The use of firearms *is* a form of Argumentum Ad Baculum and therefore is an improper form of argument.
Please limit your arguments to supportable facts and accepted forms.
Thank you.

I want to see this "nonlethal" pistol? And, Russians can have guns? And I wish someone would discuss Kant in line with me some day... that NEVER happens. :(