It seems all these negative reviewers are plagerizing each other. Haven't we seen all this before? It's getting tough to finish a piece I've already read over and over. At least this guy did try to "review" something that won't even occur until part three. That is, why would Dagny dream of John Galt if she doesn't even know him in part two? Whatever, ad nauseum.

Damn, I need Part II south of the Border!

Mccannon01 is on the mark. We have been subjected to a plethora of critical reviews that might as well be getting their talking points from the progressive caucus of the DNC. The distortions, misinterpretations and mischaracterizations are all too typical.
O.A.

Taylor's review was filled with distortions, first and foremost about the book. For starts, Rearden did not despise his wife for her jealousy of his affair with Dagny -- his wife dispised him for his character and his dedication to his work. Rearden had an inner conflict between his superficial conventional philosophy and his core personality and beliefs which drove his action and his attraction to Dagny. Taylor doesn't appear to understand this or anything else about Rand or Shrugged, and only spews ignorance about the subject.

I think it worthwhile to explore what others think of Rand, her works and why. The comments following the review were equally interesting.
Thanks for the link.

Another article that I just couldn't make myself finish. And the title... oh man, I nearly laughed.

And I must confess ignorance. Can someone please educate me on the "allusions to metal bondage"? I have no idea what that is.