Donald Trump refers to fictional Swedish incident as he blasts 'fake news'
Another good example of how Trump says what he means, but is so vague as to leave it wide open to media distortion. No doubt he is speaking to the fact Swededn opened it's doors to about 160,000 "refugees" and only 500 of them have been able to find work (since most probably do not speak swedish, not surprising) but there is a huge swell of media reports that Sweden is "politically covering up" the fact their rates of rape and violent crime have gone through the roof.
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/01/...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/world...
http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/09/ho...
So he is not making it up, it is real, but because he does not lower himself to being so nats ass specific even a moronic media person can interpret it, it gets skewed and manipulated. This is the core of Fake news, take a fact, and twist it...
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/01/...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/world...
http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/09/ho...
So he is not making it up, it is real, but because he does not lower himself to being so nats ass specific even a moronic media person can interpret it, it gets skewed and manipulated. This is the core of Fake news, take a fact, and twist it...
Never thought I'd be defending a man I didn't vote for.
Trumpet, and whom ever first thought of it, are right in finding a safe place in the region because they do not want to change their lives for the better, grow up, learn, become conscious value creators and respect the property of others...those that do, are more than welcome but when their mysticism teaches them to do harm to others...how the Hell can you tell?
I watched "border security" on netflix for Australia and Canada. They are a lot smarter on who comes into their countries than we are, and we are smarter than the stupid europeans who let anyone in.
Yes, we will take your tired, your weary and huddled masses because they Want to come, not to mention, the whole reason they are tired, weary and huddled together is because their country of origin SUCKS!
These are the people that become the Most patriotic of all.
I'd rather share my meager bootie with my local community.
That's the way it used to be.
Didn't the crowding of black Americans into the cities have the same effect?
Trump speaks a little bit in metaphors, but he is also speaking with a non-filtered factual incident at the base all the time. In the case of the "sanctuary city" nonsense, 80% of the voters polled agree with him. Don't enforce the law, you don't get any federal money.
I'm looking for the Denver mayor to own up to this one. They were simply asked to hang onto the guy for a few hours. The victim's family should certainly sue.
If they don't like the way their country is being run then they should stay and fight to change it instead of being cowards. Here in the USA we just went through yet another revolution of sorts and threw the liberal tyrants to the curb by electing a complete stranger to our highest political office. It took decades for we the people to finally say we have had enough. For Muslims coming here from that region it has to be absolute culture shock and they want nothing to do with our culture. In reality they will be perfectly happy turning our country into the same horrible conditions they ran from. We call them "NO GO ZONES" and there are a few here already. Tell me if you can, where are all these so called "Good Muslims"? I certainly can't hear them.
I just dont listen to it , and he shouldnt either. Just go and do what we hired him for- to be president and run the country as best he can.
If they'd worry more about what's going on in this world AND REPORT IT, the American populace (& other peoples of this world) would be so much better off. People, there is EVIL in our time...
There is a lot of crap going on in that really needs to have a light shined upon it...specifically radical animals who have no respect/regard for human life even if it is a "cultural anomaly" like some people want to excuse the behavior as. One can only hope we don't have to have another 09-11-01 or similar happen before some of these people wake up. "Oh...we have a problem? How did that happen?"
It was really about throwing a guilt trip about renting out the multi-million dollar vacation home for the refugee housing allowance limits, basically. And no doubt showing up later to see the laundry on a rope through the kitchen, smoke stains, carpets wrecked, holes in walls, etc.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/...
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/here...
(1) Trump makes a sweeping statement that implies (not actually states) something that isn't true.
(2) The media jumps all over him for making the statement.
(3) Trump explains what he "really" means.
(4) The media is now forced to cover the issue Trump brought up (and that they would rather ignore or bury), and possibly backtrack on some of its earlier accusations against him.
(5) Trump wins and moves on to the next topic.
(6) Rinse and repeat.
What's so dangerous here is that only half our population is aware of the problems, one quarter are only in blind denial, and another quarter are just plain ignorant. (disclosure; my figures may be slightly off)
When it comes to Trump, the media makes me dino think of a circling pack of drooling jackals, all waiting for any opening to attack their prey target.
Should one jackal sense an opening, the whole pack mindlessly follows the attack with bared teeth.
Then loudly yowled accusations of a lie spew forth from all the usual lib media foul gas outlets.
Perhaps, Trump should spend time with a speech coach specialized in the fine art of CYA.
The caller compared that to Trump absorbing media hits and then laughing about it. Here's the scene~
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzJv2...
Is that "so vague as to leave it wide open" what the heck he's saying, or is it case of leaving "no doubt" what he means.
I agree with your comment above except for your speculation that most Trump voters understood what he meant. I think most Trump voters had specific issues, like opposition to handouts, support for gun rights, or concern about health insurance premiums. They did not understand Trump, but they knew Clinton was not speaking positively about their concerns. This was enough to make them overlook Trump's antics and bigotry. A minority of voters voted for Trump, and a minority of this minority were the deplorables who are unhappy, unsophisticated, and looking for facile answers. They are not of a level of experience and education to know the difference between antics and getting things done. In the loose sense of the word, they "understood" Trump was ranting about being unhappy about life and giving a MLM-style huckster presentation about fixing whatever made them unhappy.
It sounds like you're saying the deplorables are a minority here, which is probably true.
They're the redneck idiots of the world. The thing is some people extremely PC-sensitive, and they don't like you even to use the word redneck, so I go with deplorable. Whatever you call it, it's people who took President Trump's antics, bigotry, ignorance, and rejection of law during the campaign as something positive.
I take issue with the point President Trump showing respect for the law. During a debate someone put a question to him saying, "that would be illegal. How would get people to do something illegal?" He said he was certain he could find a way. I see no respect for the law.
In the case of enforcing the immigration laws, I agree that's enforcing the laws that are on the books. I do not understand people's indignation about him enforcing the laws on the books. That's what the Executive Branch is supposed to do. This is a law, however, that President Trump agrees with and works for him politically. I am not confident he respects the law. A test would be him having to comply with laws he disagrees with or hurts him politically.
Yes. I agree. I said "most Trump voters had specific issues, like opposition to handouts, support for gun rights, or concern about health insurance premiums." (emphasis added) So I would go further than what you said and say not just "some" but most Trump voters had specific political issues that they thought Trump was more aligned on or that Clinton was less aligned on.
"Not a good way to go, but useful to the politicians, they can separate and make up their stories for each group..."
That's so true.