- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
As I and many others have identified two camps and they are always opposite.
This example shows those that value property in all it's forms and those that simply do not...BUT, it's the ole proverbial; what yours is Mine and what's mine is mine...maybe all male leftest are actually girls cause I've only heard that from girls...or as Arnold puts it: girly men.
If I own MINE and can via agreement combine MINE other people MINE without losing OWNERSHIP we can form a town, city, and ultimately a STATE. When those representative STATES combine to form a NATION it has legitimacy to set its own borders in accordance with its STATES, by way of its peoples, agreement.
Since this keeps coming up I figured I'd check.
DR. POTTER
Why is it so important for you to
struggle for years, squeezing out
meager gain rather than accept a
fortune for Rearden Metal?
HENRY "HANK" REARDEN
Because it's mine. Do you understand
that concept? Mine.
DR. POTTER
Why are you taking such a hard-line
position? I don't understand.
HENRY "HANK" REARDEN
I don't think you'll ever understand,
Doctor.
Regards,
O.A.