16

Climate Change Is Deleted From White House Web Site

Posted by $ allosaur 8 years, 3 months ago to News
69 comments | Share | Flag

The tyrannical PC power of fascist ecoNazis is broken as far as the new and improved White House is concerned.
Gone along with O, who said climate change is our greatest threat ever, is Loretta Lynch, who agreed with some libtard state attorney generals that climate change deniers should be persecuted with fines or maybe something worse.
Well, they are gone and the First Amendment still remains with us.
So, my fellow manmade climate change skeptics and outright deniers, ain't that a breath of fresh air?


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by $ 8 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That would be Ivanka and her relationship with Gore had me dino worried for a little while. Not any more.
    I also recently read that Ivanka and her father are close but are two very different people.
    Me dino has a brother who's a libtard but we still exchange Christmas presents and birthday cards.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 8 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Actually..the grand solar minimum is clearly upon our door step...we are not going to die or anything but we should be prepared...right now, everyone is being directed in the opposite direction.

    Everything progressive, anti life or liberal is essentially backwards.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 8 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hope you and your neighbors weren't to adversely effected...
    It's here in the Northeast now but I don't expect to much from it.
    It's funny, mention winds of 60mph and everyone freaks out!...hell, I've sailed a 37 footer in winds like that.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 8 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That would be something, but I suddenly have this mental picture of Trump trying to pry open a clamped shut gator's mouth.
    No, make that a "yuge" swamp snapping turtle.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 8 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    What? Something could actually be caused by the sun?
    Up until now, I've been offline since that nasty storm swept through the Deep South Saturday night.
    Mother Nature does whatever the hell she wants, Mr. Gore..
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 8 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Interesting analysis. I tend to look at who gains from the analysis being promoted. In this case it's increased political power and increased taxes. That makes me distrust what they are telling me in this case
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by lrshultis 8 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It might be best to start with what actually exists. There is radiation from the sun (the system is an open system, not isolated), atmosphere, and Earth along with the atoms and molecules of the atmosphere, Earth's solid matter as well as the waters of the Earth. All are interacting by radiation and electromagnetic fields. Enter human minds working on filtered sense data as percepts. Concepts are created in many ways about the sense data and by implication the existing matter and radiation. Patterns are noticed as weather events and patterns of those patterns are noticed as climate events over long periods of time. None of those conceptual patterns can cause anything in nature. Cause precedes from the matter and radiation and not from any abstract properties acting. Saying that climates change or that climate change can cause physical changes in nature is no more a possibility than wishing will make something happen in nature without acting. All the action is at the tiny micro level of reality and for climate cannot, as the IPCC noted, be predicted. Therefore the pretense that averaging of outputs of models can in someway cancel out errors in the model data outputs is irrational. There is no climate aside from what happens in weather and the question should be " Where is the weather in long term climate forecasts?"
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Stormi 8 years, 3 months ago
    Just keep Gore away from Ivana! Send in Dr. Illena Paugh or Tom DeWeese to explain it all to the cabinet! At least they have done their homework from the very beginning on what is the true goal.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Joseph23006 8 years, 3 months ago
    That should be only the start, next should come the real experts instead of the political hacks
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by BradA 8 years, 3 months ago
    I forecast a period of liberal and other establishment politicians heads exploding (grab your umbrellas) because an elected official stated clearly what he was going to do when elected and then ACTUALLY DID IT !
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 8 years, 3 months ago
    Climates change all the time. Trying to prevent climate change is useless and and something that is many decades away.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by preimert1 8 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yeah, here in S Cal it started raining as Trump took the oath and it ain't quit since. Our drought is broken and we seem to be back to our normal cycle of fire-rain-mud-drought and the occasional earth quake. He did what he said he'd do. Yea, Trump! Yea... glub...glub...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Owlsrayne 8 years, 3 months ago
    It's great start, pseudo-science will go into the trash bin. Now I will obtain a firewood cutting permit this coming April. Then I will finish building my 35% from horizontal stumpage mill to feed my stove.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Solver 8 years, 3 months ago
    A big blow for way overpaid pseudo-scientists.everywhere.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 8 years, 3 months ago
    Expect to see these changes with Pruitt as EPA chief, and Perry as head of Energy: funding for renewable energy research, but the end to special tax breaks, the idea being it's better to develop improved technology able to compete with carbon fuels; funding for polar orbit atmospheric sensing satellite, and an end to surface data collection which is less reliable; updated rules for new nuclear power systems as the real solution to reduced carbon emissions, including funding for thorium reactor research.

    The nuclear reactors are needed to supply materials to replace warheads in our defense arsenal, which are aging out. They're also needed for providing medical radioactive elements, which are in seriously short supply. Given those long neglected issues, and the advantage nuclear power gives us, I'm sure it will see strong support in a Trump administration. Even some of the ecomaniacs think nuclear is an acceptable way to clean up our emissions, but of course the anti-nuke people will be resurrected to become another set of screaming protesters.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo