President Trump's Inauguration Speech
Full text here:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/inaugural-...
The President spoke of nationalism, protectionism, and paternalism in short sentences of small words.
The theme of the Trump-Pence campaign and now the Trump Presidency has been about "rebuilding" and "making American great again." When did America stop building? When did it stop being great?
The desire to "get back what we lost" looks to a mythic past, not to a realizable future. Rebuilding roads is not building new kinds of infrastructures. I point out that in the 1930s, the WPA built roads, but that the Internet was technically possible as we had telephones, radios, teletypes, and wire photos. The Roosevelt Administration was truly conservative, not objectively progressive. So, too, here, is the goal to "regain what we lost" not to find and create new enterprises.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/inaugural-...
The President spoke of nationalism, protectionism, and paternalism in short sentences of small words.
The theme of the Trump-Pence campaign and now the Trump Presidency has been about "rebuilding" and "making American great again." When did America stop building? When did it stop being great?
The desire to "get back what we lost" looks to a mythic past, not to a realizable future. Rebuilding roads is not building new kinds of infrastructures. I point out that in the 1930s, the WPA built roads, but that the Internet was technically possible as we had telephones, radios, teletypes, and wire photos. The Roosevelt Administration was truly conservative, not objectively progressive. So, too, here, is the goal to "regain what we lost" not to find and create new enterprises.
Trump's promise of fewer regulations, lower taxes and better trade agreements speak to more freedom and less government.
Unfortunately protective tariffs while popular with the uninformed will, in the long run, prove detrimental to our economy.
"transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the American People." is such a declaration of freedom and self sufficiency that I cannot help but cheer every time I think of it.
Trump's speech mirrored his campaign rhetoric and was largely pro-freedom. A glaring inconsistency is his his advocating of protectionist tariffs.
But his speech pales in front of his actions. His firing of several top level managers in the State Department signals a new beginning of integrity and fairness and will help the US regain its former reputation amongst nations. His use of Twitter to eliminate the adversarial press is long overdue.
Doesn't change what I was saying about the Donald but I still have to give you the point about the CIA and the initial Benghazi reports.
Thanks for the reminder, ScoJ.
The CIA, NSA, and FBI have some very dedicated career staffers, but, like any government agency - don't underestimate the level of incompetence of a huge percentage of the people, nor the politicization of the leadership. You only get an appointed executive position if you are significantly hooked-up to the political apparatus of the sitting POTUS. You don't get significantly hooked-up to the apparatus without being willing to lie, cheat, steal, or tow the party's bullshit line of the day.
Out of the piles of people employed, basically, we can expect about 30-35% are competent and the rest the place wouldn't know if they bothered to show up every morning or not.
America has always been great, but has been in a death spiral since people started arguing that trivial jobs should get them a color TV (now large flat screen TV).
When people start working for what they produce, it will be great again. As long as they keep thinking the world owes them a living, it will be a mess.
I personally agree that we can not and should not compete "heads up" against a society that engages in involuntary servitude to an extreme. We should assign a price to what they refuse to fund, and tariff their goods.
If part of Trump's message is not we need hard workers and discipline he may succeed, but it will not be great.
There's no good reason to just keep going back and forth at each other,
but I gotta say No. I don't remember the CIA saying it was a YouTube video. I remember Obama saying that, I remember the state department saying that. I remember Susan what's-her-face going around all the news talk shows saying that. I remember Hillary lying to grieving families about it - knowing it wasn't true!.
But no, I don't remember the CIA saying that.
Did they? I could have spaced it. Wouldn't be the first time. Can you provide a link or something?
Vs: “I think there is some potential to unleash some positive results by freeing business of some of the burdens of over regulation and taxation. I also think that getting control of education back in the hands of local groups, public and private is needed.”
The second part appears to contradict the first.
Remember when the CIA was positive that Benghazi was a spontaneous combustion event after some Kansas farmers posted some video on YouTube?
Outcome-Based Education of the Clinton Era.
Goals 200 of the Bush Era
Common Core of the present
Kids were taught entitlement, but little academics, and became adults who voted and sent their children into children into the hell hole schools to get more goofy liberalism.
Also, the Basel Bank meetings which discouraged savings, as the Fed gave banks all the money they needed.
I wasn't arguing whether our intelligence agencies were capable and trustworthy - though I believe they are.
I was pointing out Trumps claim of a media created "feud" is absurd on it face - as evidenced by his own tweets.
But, again, if you didn't already see that there's nothing I can say.
mes·mer·ize
hold the attention of (someone) to the exclusion of all else or so as to transfix them.
synonyms: enthrall, hold spellbound, entrance, dazzle, bedazzle, bewitch, charm, captivate, enchant, fascinate, transfix, grip, hypnotize
On Jan 20, the appointees were handed boxes with their crap and sent on their way.
in·co·her·ent
expressed in an incomprehensible or confusing way; unclear.
synonyms: unclear, confused, unintelligible, incomprehensible, hard to follow, disjointed, disconnected, disordered, mixed up, garbled, jumbled, scrambled, muddled;
For just one example of dozens...
On numerous occasions, in his own tweets, he denounced the intelligence services. Then, in front of their memorial for fallen heros no less, he claimed his feud with them was created by the media.
That to me is incomprehensible and confused.
But seriously,if you didn't already see it that way, nothing I say will change your mind.
You say your were not a supporter, but he is the only option.
Sounds like a supporter to me.
I'm good. I'm out.
Load more comments...