They just cannot stop trying......
Nice little video of the WH press briefing where "Josh" gets to ask all the "right" questions. Not sure what the whole thing was like, but "Josh" certainly seemed to be "the man".
SOURCE URL: https://youtu.be/VkSKerJ4PeA
because they're so decentralized and the numbers involved" Obama.
He's not. He said the election was fair before and after the election. It's other people who are saying the election has/had widespread fraud.
"He has slid slowly into "We want a do over" "
This would be different. Do you have a link to him saying anything remotely close to this?
"A significant chunk of blame for the alleged interference in the US election campaign has been also put onto Russian media, particularly RT. The document, which incorrectly cited some of the so-called facts it used, claimed that RT served “as a platform for Kremlin messaging to Russian and international audiences.”
In Nazi Germany, caring Germans found out what was happening IN THEIR OWN country--Germany--from newspapers surreptitiously obtained from other countries.
Ovomit said this in his Stephanopoulos interview, yesterday, I think:
“I don't think I underestimated him, but I think that I underestimated the degree to which, in this new information age, it is possible for misinformation, for cyber hacking AND SO FORTH (caps mine) to have an impact on our open societies, our open systems, to insinuate themselves into our democratic practices in ways that I think are accelerating,” he said." ---In other words, people posting on forums such as this are posting misinformation and insinuating themselves into "our democratic practices".
http://www.rt.com/usa/373017-obama-wa...
And this about Goebbels:
"As Minister of Enlightenment, Goebbels had two main tasks:
to ensure nobody in Germany could read or see anything that was hostile or damaging to the Nazi Party.
to ensure that the views of the Nazis were put across in the most persuasive manner possible.
To ensure success, Goebbels had to work with the SS and Gestapo and Albert Speer. The former hunted out those who might produce articles defamatory to the Nazis and Hitler while Speer helped Goebbels with public displays of propaganda
.From here: http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/...
Meaning, I don't think he likes my "cut-and-paste" jobs. He made a mistake; he forgot about Goebbels' rules of propaganda.
Welcome to Nazi Germany, folks.
But try to pin the Leftist/Liberals down, and they can't even tell you what "fascist" or "fascism" means. That is why I posted Orwell's essay on "Politics and the English Language."
http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/09/politic...
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/classi...
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/...
Of course, if they did anything, they got into and DNC and cleaned their emails out. Why? Because Obama m has sh@t on Putin so much, I am surprised he hasn't dies of mysterious illness.
And the statement: "He has slid slowly into "We want a do over" and just hasn't gotten there yet, but still has a few days to go." is an editorial assessment of all the events of the last 8 weeks or so.
"mandatory 5 year sentence"
I'm against mandatory minimum sentencing, for liberalizing immigration and doubly for sentencing laws singling out undocumented people, all for reasons unrelated to this issue of elections; It's likely other Democrats are too.
"their precious world view"
It's gotten insane. I think it's just all these new "news" outlets. People knew the Enquirer was unreliable, but people now read stories even less reliable made up from whole cloth. That led to recent claims that there really aren't facts. There's just what we want to be true. If you don't like President-elect Trump, then Russian hacking hurts his legitimacy. People said Osama bin Laden wanted undermine McCain. I can want the gov't to investigate those things without it undermining the legitimacy of President Obama or President-elect Trump.
It really feels like half the society wants a "safe space" from facts they don't like. Maybe it's just the Internet. In the 90s I had a subscription to the WSJ. If someone wrote a letter to the editor that involved name-calling or claims that everything is a partisan ploy, they wouldn't print it. I think I should go back to that.
So you're right on the money with your first sentence that you have to find media that try to provide correct information.
I see no sign whatsoever of such machinations. It's all nonsense aimed at people who operate at the name-calling level.
The name-calling is childish.
If the part at the end is an allusion to ever-increasing executive branch power, it's the thing I'm most concerned about.
copyright that one, did you?
The CIA report (even the classified version) is ludicrous. They didn't investigate the DNC computers, but declared they'd been hacked by someone located in Russia. This led to the ridiculous claim that since Putin knows everything that happens in Russia, he must have directed the hack. In an attempt to reinforce the image of Russian interference, they pointed to anti-Hillary posts on the Russia Today English language YouTube channel, declaring it to be hostile propaganda. The fact that there are less than a half million subscribers to that channel, not all of whom are American voters, minimizing any influence didn't seem to get mentioned.
Fortunately, most Americans regard all of the fuss about Russian attempts to influence the outcome of the election as much ado about nothing (credit to Bill Shakespeare there). Hopefully, all of this frantic grasping at somehow making the Trump victory disappear will end with his inauguration, but some left wing extremists will, I'm sure, continue to kick up a fuss.
After reviewing all of that, the choice was obvious. Combined with her absolutely horrible failures as Secretary of State, there was no way in hell that I wanted her anywhere near the White House, whether she was crooked or not (which she decidedly is).
This press conference was as spontaneous as opening night of the play: HAMILTON.
VERY well rehearsed.
He wants public, I'll give him public!
Did anyone see Assange's WikiLeaks Press Conference this morning? Assange is protecting sources, too. Spy vs. Spy?
Nick this was really something to see , it was like an opening act of a play. These creatures lend credence to the reptilian conspiracy (somewhat kidding ,somewhat because they are unhuman) they are EVIL. They act without a conscience.
The insiders are freaking out because they will face treason charges when the proof of the corruption is revealed. I am afraid the coup is underway.