10

Causes Less Than Yourself, by Robert Gore

Posted by straightlinelogic 7 years, 3 months ago to Philosophy
23 comments | Share | Flag

This time of year prompts tributes to Causes Greater Than Yourself (CGTY). You’re to count your blessings and rededicate yourself to one or more such causes. Christianity may be on the wane, however, a panoply of secular CGTY have sprung up to replace it and its good works, purportedly filling voids in souls. What’s best not to think about—if you wish to preserve your sanity—is how much of your life you’re devoting to causes less than yourself.

This is an excerpt. To access the full article, please click the above link.
SOURCE URL: https://straightlinelogic.com/2016/12/31/causes-less-than-yourself-by-robert-gore/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 3 months ago
    Like all causes, great or small, universal or manmade; they should be considered only after the individuals needs are met and some abundance is achieved, for if the individual has no abundance beyond his need, there is nothing to give to any cause.
    To do so in spite of this natural law, will only promote unhappiness, sickness and a sense of loss, if not a physical loss to boot.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by EdGoldstein 7 years, 3 months ago
    Ayn Rand spent her career stating as loudly as she could that Altruism is the ultimate evil. Selfishness is the unknown ideal. Explaining why that is true took Fountainhead, Atlas Shrugged and the rest of her works. Still there are those who do not understand.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ProfChuck 7 years, 3 months ago
    Charity by compulsion is theft pure and simple. If one chooses to give to a cause they believe in that is a matter of personal conviction but to be forced to give, especially to causes that one finds are offensive is tantamount to slavery. I give to wounded warriors and to the SPCA and that is my choice. As much as I admire these organizations I would strongly resist any effort for compulsory giving.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 7 years, 3 months ago
    Me dino has long figured out why Big Brother does not send me thank you cards for forcing me to fund causes I am opposed to.
    I am beneath his contempt.
    Back at ya, bro!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 3 months ago
    Filling in the blank, "Do it for Mother Russia! "

    So I agree completely.

    At the end, though, it wrongly associates this do-it-for-anyone-but-yourself philosophy with respecting people's rights and protecting the environment. Those are not selfless acts. Refraining from stealing or trashing other people's stuff is not altruism. I say respecting the "rights of heretofor marginalized people" and protecting the environment are the only right and selfish (in the good way) thing to do.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by Seer 7 years, 3 months ago
      Jingoism is a British invention. Sad you had to single out the Russians.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 3 months ago
        Yes. It's just a goofy thing I heard in college, maybe a vestige of the Cold War. Pro patria certainly isn't peculiar to any one country.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by Seer 7 years, 3 months ago
          I'll need to look it up, but I think it emerged sometime around the turn of the 19th century.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 3 months ago
            In those words, that sounds right. I think it's been with us since we lived in bands of hunter/gatherers. I think we're adapted to this behavior, just as we're adapted to solve our problems with violence. I respectfully disagree with those who say altruism stems only from bad philosophy. I think it's a natural urge that we must resist.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
            • Posted by Seer 7 years, 3 months ago
              It is more prominent where and when nations become democratic; where the people vote for national policies. I read once that leaders need to, and should, educate the populace when war becomes necessary. And sometimes war IS the ONLY LEGITIMATE alternative. A caring public is never for war, although Rand has said: All the reasons which make the initiation of physical force an evil, make the retaliatory use of physical force a moral imperative

              There was a comment on RT a week or so ago; the poster hoped that "... their leaders would not lead them into war."

              Their is great uncertainty all around the world, and America's leaders are dwelling only on whether, or how, Russia influenced the election. Makes one sick.

              Tough love says it best: "[Altruism is]...a natural urge that we must resist." I've certainly had real life lessons in the need for tough love.

              Altruism is degrading to both the giver and those receiving it, don't you think?
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by rbroberg 7 years, 3 months ago
    Robert, thanks. Here are some reflections:
    Human life is a value to rational beings. This does not mean that together we achieve more. We can suffer together, and that does not do much for you or me. Another stage precipitates cooperation. And that is the thing itself: rational self-interest. Yes, opposite to the altruists, the strongest bonds are forged in the cooperation and love that evolve from shared, common self-interest. The temptation to place self-interest above rational leaves a man second-handed. Rational above self-interest leaves a man paralyzed. The mind dies, or the body. To survive, it is imperative that at each moment one focus on the marriage between rational and self-interest so that one integrates one's senses, emotions, thoughts, speech, and deeds into a proper hierarchy that supports one's ultimate goal: Life.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo