Firefly

Posted by $ MikeMarotta 11 years, 8 months ago to Entertainment
59 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

This is an example of Romantic fiction as elucidated by Ayn Rand in her book, The Romantic Manifesto. These characters act on the basis of their values. While they each know their self-interest, for each that is different, based on their personal life experiences. Thus, the show is about morality: beliefs becoming actions. Those different goals bring tensions and conflicts.

The hero is Malcolm Reynolds. He owns a spaceship, Serenity, that hauls cargo and passengers. Serenity is a "firefly" class ship, called so because the tail lights up when power is engaged. These are sublight ships. The story is set in the early 26th century. FTL does not exist. Terraforming does. China and America have united to dominate Earth; and Earth dominates the Alliance of human worlds. (There are no other sentient species.) Reynolds had been a "browncoat," a fighter in a sessionist faction whose revolt failed. Now, he seeks the frontiers, not quite far enough away from the Alliance. His crew of three consists of a former combat comrade and her husband who is the pilot, and also an engineer. Also along for the ride are a hired gun, a non-denominational Christian "Shepherd," a professional Companion (prostitute), and two refugees, a doctor and his sister.

Each of them has a defined self-interest. Usually, those coincide, thus the crew can function. Often, however, their values are in conflict as their different goals require independent choices in each situation.

The ship's hired gun, Jayne Cobb, was bought out from the men who hired him to kill Malcolm Reynolds. Cobb says, and Reynolds understands, that if the deal is ever good enough, he will turn Reynolds over to the Alliance. Yet, Jayne Cobb is there, at the ready, when he is needed because it is in his self-interest to do so.

"... value is objective (not intrinsic or subjective); value is based on and derives from the facts of reality ... Every proper value-judgment is the identification of a fact: a given object or action advances man’s life (it is good): or it threatens man’s life (it is bad or an evil). ... since every fact bears on the choice to live, every truth necessarily entails a value-judgment, and every value-judgment necessarily presupposes a truth. "Fact and Value" by Leonard Peikoff, Ph.D. here.

Malcolm Reynolds is a smuggler. He achieves that by not getting caught and having the right-looking papers. He and his crew do not need the attention that comes from having the doctor and his sister on board. They are fleeing the Alliance because Simon Tam broke River out of a government lab that was deconstructing her super-genius mind. But Captain Reynolds knows himself and his values. Doctor Tam and River are his passengers, even as they endanger his mission.

The show was touted on Atlasphere (http://www.theatlasphere.com/columns/040...).

You can watch the show on Hulu, http://TV.com, and Xfinity.Comcast. If you watch it on DVD, you can enjoy the backstory and commentary about the struggle to create and maintain the integrity of the work. A movie, Serenity, was released in 2005. Much more about Firefly will be revealed by your web browser.

This was originally brought to my attention by "Ba'al Chatzoff" a non-Objectivist on the discussion board "Objectivist Living."

Read the IMDB blub, cast and crew credits here:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0303461/

The Wikipedia article is here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefly_(TV...)


All Comments

  • Posted by Rocky_Road 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Followup:

    The library's copy was on 4 discs, and included 14 shows. I am watching the final episode tonight.

    I also picked up Serenity, and will have it watched by morning!

    So far, my favorite episode was "Out of Gas".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I just thought of something else. I'm not a big science fiction reader, but it occurred to me that science fiction is about what's plausible more than about what's actually been invented.
    For example, we can extract the DNA of dinosaurs stored in mosquitos from the Jurassic period. (turns out the DNA is too corrupted) BUT it's plausible.
    The possibility of life based on silicon instead of carbon.
    1. every invention is a combination of known elements
    2. Do not limit yourself to existing technology
    3. If the science is plausible, don't worry about the details.
    My husband is a physicist and patent attorney. We deal with inventors every day.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I'd say Heinlein, Asimov, Pournelle & Niven are among the "hard" science fiction writers (and therefore, by my definition, "science fiction writers"). Asimov actually wrote more real science books than he wrote science fiction.

    I wanted to be a science fiction writer all my life, but I had a problem; I kept insisting on getting the science right, which would mean things like actually inventing an FTL drive before I could write a real-time interstellar story, for example.
    I eventually gave up trying for decades. Now I'm trying again.
    First "Roarke's Drift", an Atlas Shrugged type SF story (I'll be coming to Atlas Productions to get the movie made, if/whenever :). Then "Voyage of the Dark Horse" (gotta have it done by fall of 2014), a time-travel story, then a series of stories that take place on Venus, and a series of stories about a person who eternally despises the human species... with good reason.
    All I gotta do is get myself to type out the words...

    Among my favorite lines from Firefly:
    Wash: "Psychic? Sounds like something out of science fiction"
    Zoe: "We live in a spaceship, dear."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    look at it this way... by supporting Firefly/Serenity, you also support Adam Baldwin, a noted conservative on twitter.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ Hiraghm 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    If you think my response was "apoplectic", you must be an Obama supporter.
    The difference between "sci-fi" and "science fiction" is not of Momentous Import, but it is the same same as the difference between words such as "hear" and "here" in clarity of thought.

    Sci-fi (thank you syfy channel) can be anything from fairy tales to faux-documentaries.

    The difference is only important to people who wish to read science fiction and have to wade through the muddled swamp of pseudo-science fiction and fantasy to find science fiction to read.

    I would classify "Firefly" as more "space opera" than actual science fiction. But it's close enough by today's standards.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by gypciz 11 years, 8 months ago
    I HIGHLY recommend the Firefly Series, then watch Serenity. My husband worked on Serenity. He's a Visual Effects Artist & create the all digital rain in a scene where the Serenity spaceship is leaving a space port in a driving rain storm. He created other effects as well, but as the saying goes in Hollywood, "they wound up on the cutting room floor".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by gypciz 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    FOX killed Firefly deliberately. They kept pre-empting it for "specials" or to roll out new shows, then changed it's permanent time slot. It became so confusing that most people thought it was cancelled before it was. This is a page out of NBC's play book, who have killed many a show I have liked with this underhanded excuse for programming!!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ DriveTrain 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "I've never been a sci-fi fan. I always preferred science fiction"

    LOL

    Errmm, in English and in most other humanoid languages, there's this thing called "abbreviations." I recommend you study up on the concept, because over time you'll be running into it all the time. It's just everywhere, I'm afraid.

    Seriously, after reading Ben Bova's unintentionally-comedic fits of anal-retentiveness on that issue of Momentous Import, I've taken up the practice of using "sci-fi" exclusively, because I think apoplectic reactions to inconsequential trivia are irrational, and... I've never preferred irrationality.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ Hiraghm 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    My apologies; I missed the initial quotation marks and regarded the attribution as a simple tagline.

    Just FYI, I'm not a religionist. I'm an agnostic turned Christian (as I put it, "a shirt-tail Christian").
    I don't believe in religion (as an institution). I do believe in God. I don't require others to believe as I do.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Rocky_Road 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks for the answer.

    I haven't picked up the DVD yet, it is still checked out. My guess is that it has the entire season.

    I'll follow it up with another viewing of "Serenity"!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ rockymountainpirate 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Don't skip the show. While the movie can stand by itself, it's best watched after watching all the series. You'll understand the dynamics in the movie if you have the background of the show.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    My other favorite line, that most everyone here will hate with an unreserved passion:

    Shepherd Book: "You don't fix the Bible; it fixes you".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by bep_w 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well, I see where you're coming from. But in the context of someone doing their job and doing it well, Firefly and Serenity go above and beyond. And this show is most definitely NOT his soap box for delivering his agenda. The Socialist government is the enemy and the Independent, free thinkers are the heroes. And do I support that message? Oh most assuredly!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think my favorite line was, "Might have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by bep_w 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The show is only one season. My version has it on 4 discs so they might have split it up. It's also sold at Walmart, Target, Amazon, etc. I have a feeling that after seeing the first few episodes, you might want to invest in the rest! Oh and just a heads up: The episodes fit into an hour time slot so they're about 45 minutes, except the first one which is an hour and a half. It lays out the entirety of the show's exposition and takes the time to pretty fully develop the characters. It also has one of my favorite lines in the show, "that man is psychotic;" it's a treat!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • -1
    Posted by $ 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hiraghm, it is not my comment, just a quote from scatcatpdx that I used to suggest why he does not like "Firefly." We get a surprising number of religionists here. The best way to work this process is to thread through the posts to see who is commenting on what. The presentation software tracks discussion by a simple hierarchy: this is my reply to your reply.

    If you click someone's name, you can see their introduction page with a dropdown for Submissions and Comments. It is a pretty good way to get to know what someone is about.

    For all of that, though, welcome to the Gulch.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Pretty much explains why I'm not an objectivist. The idea that producers are in a very small intellectual minority is as hilarious as it is arrogant. It's the kind of comment I'd expect from a progressive.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Although I love Firefly/Serenity, I've never been a sci-fi fan. I always preferred science fiction.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I loathe Inara for her profession (having me on board with her, particularly with Mal's feelings for her, would have made for some interesting discussions...) I do not respect professional liars, even if their clients are willing to be lied to.

    In particular, Heinlein's "Tunnel in the Sky" portrays a society that has to start over from scratch on an alien world.
    Pournelle and Stirling's "Falkenberg's Legion" series actually takes this much farther. At one point a character is bemused by the fact that he's riding a 19th century paddlewheel boat up a river, alongside a hovercraft from a century later, overseen by a helicopter, and he got there in a starship.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo