Jill Stein raises more funds for recount than entire presidential campaign
Stein is asking for a recount in Wisconsin and most likely in Pennsylvania and Michigan. The three states Clinton needs to win the election. Note: Clinton herself has not asked for the recpount but MS Stein.
She raised more money for the recount than she did for the actual election campaign. She also raised if very fast. Has anyone checked the Clinton Campaign to see if they are funneling money to her so she can be the "Bad Guy" about the vote and the recount (just paranoid about the Clintons).
Next it will be Gov. Johnson asking for a recount in other states. They really want to get Hillary into the white House by hook or crook.
The article says they (the recount requestor) needs to show cause for the recount. I'm not sure what MS Stein has to say there other than she doesn't want Trump to be President and wants a recount to possible throw the election into question .
She raised more money for the recount than she did for the actual election campaign. She also raised if very fast. Has anyone checked the Clinton Campaign to see if they are funneling money to her so she can be the "Bad Guy" about the vote and the recount (just paranoid about the Clintons).
Next it will be Gov. Johnson asking for a recount in other states. They really want to get Hillary into the white House by hook or crook.
The article says they (the recount requestor) needs to show cause for the recount. I'm not sure what MS Stein has to say there other than she doesn't want Trump to be President and wants a recount to possible throw the election into question .
WShipley is right. This is a dry hole for the socialists.
More sour grapes because the well of illegal, duplicitous Dem votes went dry.
If you go on a few lib sites, you'll find Greenlady Jill getting attaboys all over the place. See? It's catching.
Of course this isn't Florida 2000 where there were 1784 votes (brought down to 537 with selective recounting). The minimum is Michigan with 10,704, Wisconsin has 27,257 and Pennsylvania has 70,638. Nothing is going to happen.
What's interesting is that the oh so honest Ms Stein states that she has no intention of returning the money donated even if the request for recount is denied, but will use any money collected to set up a voting integrity foundation (whatever the hell that would be). In any event it's a pretty good scam.
She probably thinks it's immoral to let suckers keep their money.
Either that, or she is just doing this on the behest of Clinton who doesn't want to be seen as doing it herself, so she is having a proxy do it for her.
Good Luck Asshole!
I'm guessing that if the recount overturns the result in both states she will then ask for a recount in Michigan. Personally I think she is doing the work of the Democrat Party since they don't want to appear to be making waves about the election.
There is no rational reason for thinking that a recount will significantly change her vote total and no real reason to think that the toal will change significantly for the other candidates.
If her purpose is to sow discontent among the voters, she wins, if it to overturn the election results, I would estimate there is a 99.99% change it won't.
Wisconsin is concerned about making the December 19 hard deadline. The very same hard deadline that the Supreme Court cited Bush v Gore in stopping the 2000 recount. The court had no interest in depriving a state of it's vote over legal infighting.
http://elections.wi.gov/node/4436
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-wa...
Seems a bit odd to me that the party who insists upon "truth" in voting does all they can to promote anything but!