VIDEO: Boy Prays to Obama

Posted by $ AJAshinoff 10 years, 9 months ago to News
62 comments | Share | Flag

Truly, combined with server other instances caught on video, this is the cult of personality. It seemed like this kid was coached by someone off camera, an unfit parent?
SOURCE URL: http://www.infowars.com/video-boy-prays-to-obama/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ 10 years, 9 months ago
    This is and has been O from the beginning. Recall when he was initially elected one man committed suicide asking O to look after his children. O, like socialism and communism is as EVIL as it comes.

    Yes, I can make and have made a strong argument that anything other than capitalism is pure evil (like the devil).
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ rockymountainpirate 10 years, 9 months ago
    Isn't this similar to what the Hitler Youth did?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by j_IR1776wg 10 years, 9 months ago
      Right on. I remember a clip on the History channel of Hitler in Austria surrounded by little girls in white dresses singing to him calling him god.No difference between then and now.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 10 years, 9 months ago
        So right j_IR1776wg,
        The young are so impressionable. There is a reason we do not let them vote. They are so easily manipulated by propaganda... so easily caught up in things...
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHoxl8IK7...
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by j_IR1776wg 10 years, 9 months ago
          Good point OA. I wonder if BO would have been elected if the voting age was still 21?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ 10 years, 9 months ago
            I suspect he would have even if he were six. There is no legitimate way that he could have won the last election based on reason. In PA 5 large counties registered not one vote for Romney - odd? You can't get 10 people in a room, put up a topic, and get consensus. Voting machines were found preloaded with O votes, never McCain or Romney votes - odd? The black panther were caught on film intimidating people at the polling places and the DOJ dropped the case - odd? On the east coast (can't recall where) RNC poll workers were routinely turned away polling places while DNC poll workers were packed in to cover stations - odd? No, the election of O stinks, but no one wants to face it (because its the blue print that tells them how to get what they all covet). I know I'm cynical, but I have good reason.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by j_IR1776wg 10 years, 9 months ago
              I was born and raised in Hudson County New jersey which might be up there with Cook County Illinois in terms of corruption. Fixing votes seemed to be more of a local thing when I was younger. Now it seems to have gone national. Sic transit gloria voting in America?
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 10 years, 9 months ago
    This is bizarre, but I don't see it as the first step to some sort of totalitarian cult of personality. It's a few kids saying something weird.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 10 years, 9 months ago
      It a pattern of behavior developing in the black community direct toward uplifting or deifying O...It sure as hell isn't his ability to lead that's causing this...must be his race and personality (his likeability numbers are still pretty good). Last time I saw this kind of behavior from kids toward a president/leader it was Saddam Hussein (cult of violence and depravation).
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by gblaze47 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "you seem to be arguing the Platonist position that there is some sort of barrier between us and Objective Reality."
    Well in only in the way we perceive objective reality. The difference between an Objectivist and a Relativist, is we know that the universe is objective and not based on our perceptions, to Relativist reality is based on their perception ie: "a persons perception is their reality" which is truly nonsensical.
    "We can't really tell what the world is. Your earlier statement shows that to be contradictory."
    Your right we can't, I wasn't debating that, but how we interact with it and react to it is, it is with a degree of subjectivity, and that was my point. We try to minimize our subjectivity and use controls to negate it, but we can never really be free of it totally.

    "That humans can be subjective is irrelevant to the argument. "
    Not sure what the point is here, if it is 'irrelevant' then we might as well end the discussion, we are humans after all and we have to deal with what we are given, calling something 'irrelevant' doesn't necessarily make it so. Also it isn't that humans can be subjective, it is that they are subjective. We can even take this to a logical conclusion, if humans are subjective that becomes an objective truth and something we have to account for in anything discussion of humans and Objectionism.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by gblaze47 10 years, 9 months ago
    It's frightening bordering on perversion! Using children and brainwashing them!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by khalling 10 years, 9 months ago
      have you ever forced your kids to say prayers or go to church?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ brewer37 10 years, 9 months ago
        I think it's important to take kids to church. If you don't they will wonder what goes on in there.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 10 years, 9 months ago
          I'm not a church goer but the important aspect of church..any church, except Islam (my opinion), is to provide a moral framework. I think thats the main issue with this country today, too many are inclined to think there is no right and wrong, that everything is gray. This is why we have such crappy politicians that can double speak and do vile things and still get elected. The political correctness of the"have to walk a mile in my shoes" mentality is destroying this country. That said, morality is personal but only slightly varies from one individual to the next regardless of religion/faith (except islam) when in a country such as ours. My 2 bits.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by gblaze47 10 years, 9 months ago
        Is it force if I make them brush their teeth or take a bath? As a parent I am to take care of my child to my best ability, and if that includes saying prayers or going to church, then yes It is my responsibility to do so.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by khalling 10 years, 9 months ago
          ok, no brainwashing EVER happened in a church anywhere. I'm just responding to your comment. We have to agree to disagree with the parents of Obama praying youngster. But there's some shocking things I've seen and read about that happen in "church." and I'm not even talking about those things deemed child abuse or illegal in any way. So a christian parent is shocked that children are indoctrinated with Islam. Presbyterians are shocked at Baptists, Catholics are shocked at Mormons, etc. think wars. many of them fought over what one sect sees as perversion. The kid seems happy and well-fed. The house seems neat and respectable. I hope I get a crack at changing that child's philosophical principles one day, but the NEA and team nationalized education will get there first.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ 10 years, 9 months ago
            Me thinks the truth lies in the individual. Structured religion is merely social trappings once used to create a social structure and validate leadership. Does that mean the individual cannot or should not believe in an unseen higher power? Nope.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by khalling 10 years, 9 months ago
              absolutely. but I maintain I'm less shocked at this video than I am watching a video where people are "talking in tongues" and playing with snakes. jus sayin
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by $ 10 years, 9 months ago
                Thought you may like this..since you mentioned the snakes....great song..odd video
                http://youtu.be/-ijOlAR3zs8
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by khalling 10 years, 9 months ago
                  yea, freaky disconnect. why?
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by $ 10 years, 9 months ago
                    No clue. They are a relatively new band with an old style sound. Maybe they are trying to make waves. The video to me doesn't jibe with the music.
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Posted by khalling 10 years, 9 months ago
                      no. and the whole baptism in the river deal. snakes aside- as a lifeguard, one rule: DO NOT let someone push your head and body under water. here's where the faith part comes in. I strongly urge against it. even if you're "re-born" after the experience. I do not mean to denigrate someone's ritual-but if it goes against all common sense..
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Posted by Rocky_Road 10 years, 9 months ago
                        Ever seen the movie "A Bridge Too Far"?

                        I think that you just did "A Post Too Far"...!

                        ;-)

                        Nobody has ever been in any danger being baptized, except perhaps John the Baptist...he lost his head over it.
                        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                        • Posted by khalling 10 years, 9 months ago
                          I didn't say there were baptism drownings-I said "why???"
                          1. why can't you dip your own head and body
                          2. why do you have to do it in a large body of water
                          3. how are you changed? NOT
                          4. what's the upside?
                          5. and babies are just as pure after being dribbled with water as they were before
                          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                          • Posted by LetsShrug 10 years, 9 months ago
                            It's all about that feeeeeeeling Penn was just talking about. Washing away your sins and getting a ticket to heavenly bliss.
                            Full bodied baptisms are easier in large bodies of water...they're also done inside churches (I know this personally) but it takes a lot of water to fill that tank up and someone has to make sure it's drained and dried and cleaned and recovered....the lake is easier... not as clean, however. The baby baptism has always bothered me too... If God isn't going to let in a baby then I'm not sure you're a good God. Oh...and you have to have some ordained minister person officiate the baptism, so you can't dunk yourself... that's just swimming.
                            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Posted by LetsShrug 10 years, 9 months ago
                        I've seen a zillion large body of water (Lake Huron) baptisms and no one ever got their heads shoved under lol...they are laid back ever so gently until submerged and then lifted back up out of the water. No one was scared or mean...and no snake were ever present...or at least none were visible.
                        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                        • Posted by khalling 10 years, 9 months ago
                          a zillion all at the same time???!!! head shake
                          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                          • Posted by LetsShrug 10 years, 9 months ago
                            Well the lake was big enough to accommodate that many but no, not at the same time... I've never seen multiple, simultaneous baptisms. I think it's supposed to me more personal than that. Over the course of many years and much church going and camp attending I witnessed many many baptisms beach side (sitting on a grassy hill in fact).. sometimes even at sunrise. Which was actually kind of a neat thing to witness....minus the baptism.
                            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by gblaze47 10 years, 9 months ago
            Look I'm not going to get into a debate about religion, this isn't the forum and would take far longer than either of has. Difference between you and me, I look at the message you look at the messenger. No human is perfect and so will get things wrong, I include myself, but the message will never change and has never changed.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by khalling 10 years, 9 months ago
              gblaze,
              I happen to look at both and I think you do as well.I just wanted to address this specific example and put it into perspective. The message sent to the little boy by his parents should not be argued as blasphemy and perversion. It should be the content and substance of the values behind his "prayer." It is substance-less. Elevating a man to a deity is irrational.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by gblaze47 10 years, 9 months ago
                Again not what I was saying, and sadly your taking much about Christianity out of context. But I would say 'Elevating a man to a deity' is not irrational just incorrect and impossible. From reading many 'young' peoples comments, there's an aversion to 'irrationality'. Humans are irrational beings that is just a fact, it's failing or strength, depends on how you view it. I believe it's a characteristic of a brain based on neural nets and not binary logic. A computer does not a human make. Again this can go on for years and without the ability to be resolved in any manner. So that's all I got to say about that.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by khalling 10 years, 9 months ago
                  "It's frightening, bordering on perversion!" I am responding to this comment you made.
                  To suggest what you know to be impossible would be irrational, would it not? As to your statement that man is an irrational being, from Galt's Speech:

                  "Rationality is the recognition of the fact that existence exists, that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it, which is thinking—that the mind is one’s only judge of values and one’s only guide of action—that reason is an absolute that permits no compromise—that a concession to the irrational invalidates one’s consciousness and turns it from the task of perceiving to the task of faking reality—that the alleged short-cut to knowledge, which is faith, is only a short-circuit destroying the mind—that the acceptance of a mystical invention is a wish for the annihilation of existence and, properly, annihilates one’s consciousness." -Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by gblaze47 10 years, 9 months ago
                    "It's frightening, bordering on perversion!" I am responding to this comment you made."

                    That has nothing to do with anything except my perception of it. I think your jumping to many conclusions without determining why I said what I said or where my thinking was coming from.

                    Nice speech, so your going to quote from what a book tells you over what a book tells me?? I wonder if you see the irony.
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Posted by khalling 10 years, 9 months ago
                      It is relevant and on point. and this is an Atlas Shrugged site last time I checked, gblaze. I apologize if I have made conclusions about what you said, I rather thought I was stating my personal opinion of the video.
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Posted by gblaze47 10 years, 9 months ago
                        " I rather thought I was stating my personal opinion of the video. "

                        Sorry but I find that confusing at best, you asked a question;

                        "have you ever forced your kids to say prayers or go to church? "

                        Not a personal opinion.

                        "It is relevant and on point. "

                        How so? You never tied what you were saying with what I stated. You did assume a lot.

                        "and this is an Atlas Shrugged site last time I checked,"

                        So you thought you would quote from the book to support your view? Does this mean that we can only base our discussion on what is in Atlas Shrugged?

                        I have to be honest all though I see a lot of validity in Ayn Rands book, I do not believe in everything she has stated, after all she is basing much of what she has written on her personal experience which is different for each of us.
                        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                        • Posted by sdesapio 10 years, 9 months ago
                          Although I haven't read the entire conversation here, I did manage to pick up in passing what you suggest at the end of this comment and wanted to quickly respond.

                          RE: "... she is basing much of what she has written on her personal experience."

                          This is actually not the case blaze. Rand was not a "Subjectivist." Everything she wrote was based on the acknowledgement of an Objective Reality first. Rand's point-of-view is actually irrelevant. And, that's actually the point of all of her writing in general - a subjective point-of-view has no bearing on the truth.
                          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                          • Posted by gblaze47 10 years, 9 months ago
                            Although I agree the world is based on Objective reality, I still believe we as people, can't interact with the Objective reality. Case in point, when we look at an image it takes our eyes to process the image approximately 200 milliseconds before it even gets to our brains, every human literally is seeing reality 200 milliseconds in the past. Not much but it is significant and leads to a lot of subjective processing by the person. I can go on and on but again this would take longer than we have .
                            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                            • Posted by khalling 10 years, 9 months ago
                              how does this mean one does not "interact with reality" ? In fact, the very statement of the 200 millisecond delay implies an Objective Reality that can be measured.
                              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                              • Posted by gblaze47 10 years, 9 months ago
                                I didn't say they could not "interact with reality" I was stating that a person cannot interact with our objective reality without, at the very slightest, being subjective.
                                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                                • Posted by khalling 10 years, 9 months ago
                                  you seem to be arguing the Platonist position that there is some sort of barrier between us and Objective Reality. You're calling it subjective. We can't really tell what the world is. Your earlier statement shows that to be contradictory. That humans can be subjective is irrelevant to the argument.
                                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                                  • gblaze47 replied 10 years, 9 months ago
                        • Posted by khalling 10 years, 9 months ago
                          I'll respond to the first part. You are correct that I asked about forcing your kids to o to church. The thread got very long, and I frankly forgot that you might be responding to that since I also laid out my opinion of the video. I thought you were responding to that. As I said earlier, my apologies if if it seemed I was putting words into your mouth. Not my intention.
                          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo