22

Hillary Had Violent Meltdown Night She Lost

Posted by $ allosaur 7 years, 12 months ago to Politics
84 comments | Share | Flag

Heard Hannity on the radio mention a source who said Hillary missed her concession speech because she had a meltdown, screaming and throwing things at people. So when me dino drove home I looked it up. Read five links and picked one.
Me dino was not surprised.
Recall it getting out via a Secret Service leak that Hillary screamed and threw a lamp at Slick Willie when the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke.
Me dino glad a certain Madam President won't be able lose it with a country that has nukes.
SOURCE URL: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/hillary-drunk-violent-meltdown-election-night/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • 12
    Posted by $ Suzanne43 7 years, 12 months ago
    I heard the same thing on Rush today, Dino. Why am I not surprised. With her temper, it's a good thing that she isn't in charge of the nuclear button. And the Liberals are scared of Trump...good grief.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by ewv 7 years, 12 months ago
      Unfortunately Obama and his Hillary-Kerry State Dept. have already been in charge of the nuclear button given to Iran for reasons of ideology much worse than a temper tantrum.

      As for Cackle's behavior on election night, whatever the truth of the details this account certainly sounds plausible because of what she is and her history. Some kind of breakdown was the first explanation that occurred to me when Podesta showed up as a cover where the candidate would normally be.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by mminnick 7 years, 12 months ago
    All of the signs were there and testimony from Secret Service officers supplied via books and articles (none of which were every denied).
    We did really dodge a bullet (a very large 20MT bullet).
    +1
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 7 years, 12 months ago
      Methinks the mouse coward troll musta popped me a 0.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Dobrien 7 years, 12 months ago
        +1
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 7 years, 12 months ago
          At this point I read a 6. Take that, Squeaks.
          Squeaks is my name for the Mouse Coward Troll. .
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by Dobrien 7 years, 12 months ago
            Squeaks has been hitting mminnick a lot also.
            Squeaks could be a character in Little reds endevoures a dirty dealing double agent that sometimes is more trouble than worth.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by $ 7 years, 12 months ago
              If I'm not mistaken, mminnick is one of those I helped out when I went on a little crusade last night. Found four posts in New with a zero, checked out the content, decided they did not deserve a zero from Squeaks and gave each a +1. Then I actually found a zero in Hot.that I decided did not deserve it either.
              Came to do the same tonight but saw no zeros. Saw a lot with a number 1 but there's no way to determine if it had a 2 previously
              Generally I don't read all the posts save for what's hot that lands in my email every morning. Me dino got other stuff to do.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by ewv 7 years, 12 months ago
      We dodged a bullet, but 'long live the bullet'. The dog just caught the car he was chasing. Thankfully one of them had to lose and the outcome could have been much worse.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ohiocrossroads 7 years, 12 months ago
    I've been thinking that sometime during election night, Shrillary found time to call George Soros and get him rolling on calling up the rent-a-mobs for violent demonstrations.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by GaryL 7 years, 12 months ago
    Who cares? The only time I want to even hear her name from this point on is if it is associated with the FBI, a Special Investigator or in the police blotter.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Susanne 7 years, 12 months ago
      IMO not even then. I'm done with the Presidential Dynastic Games... they were talking about various lame duck laws that congress is going to try to force down our throats - how about this one -

      If you are a blood or immediate family relation to anyone serving, or who has served, as President of the United States, including any Present sitting or former incumbent of said office, you are ineligible to run for, or hold the office of, President, Vice President, or Secretary of State.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 7 years, 12 months ago
      Yes! Absolutely! Don't care if you wrote "Who cares?" due to what else you wrote.
      Slight my future posts the same positivity for an outcome and I'll proclaim GaryL as the best thing since sliced bread!
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by tohar1 7 years, 12 months ago
    Absolutely couldn't happen to a more fitting person. She is such a terrible individual. I cannot imagine someone with her temperament occupying the seat of the most powerful office in the world. There wouldn't have been a scenario that I could imagine (and believe me, I've got quite an impressive imagination) where I could have supported her through my vote.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by hattrup 7 years, 12 months ago
    Hiliary, "Can't we just drone him" Rodham (Clinton) - in action yet again. Unfortunately, once the dust settles the royal Clinton group will figure out how to continue using each other at our expense...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Susanne 7 years, 12 months ago
    Her temperament was already well known - and while I don't blame her in the least for blowing up at the Lewinnski fiasco (do you? Really?) people who knew her when 42 was in office said she was pretty shrewish...

    What was scary was people wanted to ignore this to get her in... and while they were sniveling about 45-elect having his finger on the nuclear trigger, it was "she-who-shall-not-be-named" that was itching - through words and actions - for a hot war with Russia.

    I know a lot of you are atheists, but maybe God was watching over us... saving us from the fiery pits of nuclear hell... --giggles--

    --boom--
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo