Why has there been no condemnation of the violent anti-Trum protests from the Clinton Campaign or the White House?

Posted by mminnick 9 years, 8 months ago to Politics
6 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

If I missed the statements from these two illustrious sources I will withdraw my question.
If the situation was reversed and a Republican in the White House and A dem having just be elected, there would be screams from the press about the silence. They would claim the protestors were anti-democratic and unfairly wanting the election changed.
But we hear silence Why?

All Comments

  • Posted by $ Abaco 9 years, 8 months ago
    Because they like it. It's right out of 1984. The purpose of the violence is the violence.

    Glad I could help...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 8 months ago
    Conservative people outside the liberal socialist cities would not dispute an election by demonstrating and offering bribes to electors to change their votes. They respect the law and live by it (with the minor exceptions of some victimless crimes like speeding on the empty freeway at 3am.)
    These demonstrators are following the lead of their unethical traitorous candidate and the current sitting president.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 8 months ago
    My answer is exactly what I said when people demanded Trump respond to some of his supporters' racism, sexism, and violent acts. The answer is saying, "Well, I'm not a crook!" does not work in politics.
    Ignoring them is the right thing to do.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo