- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
Has anyone else noticed that so many of those liberal Hollywood actors who deride success, especially success in business always demand multi-million dollar salaries to appear in those staid movies? The do as I tell you, not as I do crowd. They always remind me of Jim Taggart and friends.
As far as the article goes and why was the movie successful enough to continue, I think it is mostly, as you said, a function of the millions of people who have read the book over the years, wanting to see it brought to life. Even if it's not perfect.
I know I introduced several people to the movies who had no prior interest... the movies are a great icebreaker.
The story has allot of real life comparisons of political corruption that make it very interesting to me. But when they replaced all of the actors of the main characters between the 1st and 2nd movie it made the flow between them a little difficult to follow (could that have been a political influence to quite the impact of this series).
It is because of the movies that I will likely buy the book. Does anyone know Al Gat?
Did you give it a 'thumbs up', in the upper right corner?